Danioover9000

@supremeyingyang Developmental psychology, and the evolution of ideas and the passage of time;.

@Devin Could you elaborate a bit more?

@Roy @Emerald What is the main argument between you two? You can be weaselly at the end, but why not address her claim and loaded question directly once? What are those specific issues and semantics you differ from the progressives? I don't care who started this heated discussion, but NO HEATED ARGUING AND DEBATE! Against forum guidelines. Try to address the key points in each of your argumentations without assassinating each others character, okay?

@mr_engineer That's actually a decent movie, yes parts of it will be sad, but the payoff at the end was worth watching the movie.

@The Mystical Man Why are you just assuming those cases are solely on @Leo Gura?

@Leo Gura This is actually a good point, people here are so over focused on the victims that they don't bother to empathize and understand what @Leo Gura had to emotionally go through for his insights. It's like a thought terminating cliche made to make any good faith communication and charitable takes of Actualized.org not possible, hence these drama pandering YouTube Reactionaries are poisoning the well of good faith discussions here, shame on some of you.

@The Mystical Man That's not interesting, that's mental discrimination that User was spouting. I don't like Reactionaries, but I don't go calling them off as Schizophrenic.

@Leo Gura So true, I think the well's poisoned so much at this point that there's no amount of good faith communication for some time, without spending that chunk in dialogue debunking those stereotypes in these socialist/progressive's minds of 'ALL CONSERVATIVES ARE FASCIST/NAZIS!!!???

@Thought Art My first introduction to Actualized.org was a video @Leo Guradid about anger. It was what I needed to hear at the time, but that put me off for a few months though. Since then Leo's communication has improved over time especially recently and I stuck around for 5 years slowly learning anout the various concepts. I think it's the occasional video thwt either is very advanced or is communicated too straight forwardly, and that forum Leo is too blunt than video Leo. Maybe that's the conflation?

Wowz such a crazy thread. What has happened so far?

This is clearly an overreaction. Historically it was way worse for gays and the LGBTQ community. Nowadays it's not that bat at all, Progressives love to catastrophes all conservatives of being Fascists and Nazis, forgetting America and it's Allies fought Nazi Germany. Especially the onlune left does this. The right is justified in feeling uncomfortable or other feelings when LGBTQ community openly over celebrating in the mainstream, and some are concerned of trans confusion in some of the more left wing education places, just look at Sweden's attempt at gender neutral grooming programs. They're not justified in finding harmful ways to express those negative feelings and uncomfortable state, and I put blame on the online variations of these political groups due to how the internet increases neurosis and narcissism and crazies at either wings. And stop supporting children beuty shows, that's far worse and should be illegal.

@ZenAlex I don't like the person, but it's not nice name calling the person. Turkey Tom??? More like Tom and Jerry!? Then again, in some of my rap posts, I do say whacky corny stuff all the time?

@Osaid You can thank me for that later.

@Carl-Richard You're right, I, as the good Samaritan I am, reported the video.

@Thought Art That's nice, I'm similar. Osho though is a bit slower for my view, but if I want to slow down he's good to listen to. Sadh guru is a bit better in pacing and if I want an insight with a story to it and a bit of humour he's perfect for it. Leo is when I'm excited and giddy to listen to his insights, never amazes me that he's the exception to the rule of talking too fast /=/ higher intelligence.

Guys and girls, be careful when dealing with the paranormal and supernatural. This just happened: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/offbeat/girls-may-have-opened-a-doorway-to-evil-after-playing-with-ouija-board-at-school/ar-AA18Fvit?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=864b7f53c6ca4990b44dee2f793d3b64&ei=8 Practice spirituality with responsibility and safety for your life and well being in mind. Treat this entities as if real, and handle with caution.

@lostingenosmaze Big assumption here being conflated, that saying you are this good or that amazing, in this 'I'm so enlightened that bla bla bla' is already a big mistake here. What's actually happened is that there's an overreaction to someone who has had a deep understanding of reality that contradicts parts of it a person holds dear, and are similar to teachings of the past. However, it's the demonization, culturally and mainstream for roughly a century of psychedelic use by the Nixon administration that ends up generating most of the misunderstandings of psychedelics, and that had many implications to other areas and domains that partly use psychedelics here. @AdeptusPsychonautica's just limited by his calling, of a YouTube reactionary that specializes in drama farming, and should be considered with a bucket of salt whether his claims are valid and truthful. He already has made up his mind long ago to create reactionary content against @Leo Gura and Actualized.org content for the foreseeable future, and will utilize those who have had a more negative than positive experience with Actualized.org for future hit pieces on it.

@Rigel I'm asking if @AdeptusPsychonautica can make assertions and claims, can argue against Actualized.org content being in YouTube, and Actualized.org being the sole cause of these Specific cases of suicides recently in this community, with little evidence to back up such claims? I'm not asking if he has the right to do these claims, I'm asking if he can still make immoral claims and make unjustifiable criticism to @Leo Gura's content, when said content is not the main cause, and get's to conflate his advanced teachings as the main cause? Does he get to make slanderous and defamatory takes as well, some that can and do effect the earnings and PR of Actualized.org when later it could be the case that such bold claims were falsely made for clout?

@Israfil Actually this is a fair point, as people with a bias against @Leo Gura and Actualized.org conflate his spiritual teachings and psychedelics as the only cause of a person suiciding, which needs further proofing and justification for such a bold claim, and already those making these claims such as @AdeptusPsychonautica are in shaky grounds for making a persuasive and convincing case against Actualized.org. They only make reactionary content for the drama and viewership, and make outlandish and bad claims that Actualized.org is the only source of these suicidal ideations, meanwhile making some profit and buzz from the sensational coverage of those cases which is to me immoral to do so.

@Rigel So that justifies him making defamatory content against Actualized.org?

@CARDOZZO Nice!

@Thought Art Yes, world is dangerous, but how does that address and justify @AdeptusPsychonautica's behavior and reactionary content against @Leo Gura's content in YouTube when he already has warnings and disclaimers of his content being advanced and not suitable for viewers with mental disorders and psychosis? Leo's work is only dangerous, or are there other dangers that follow that type of work? User error? People come into this work, mostly forgetting to read the warnings and disclaimers for every video, and within this forum. Is @Leo Gura responsible for a viewer's/user's forgetfulness and obfuscation of responsibility onto Leo? Yes, danger is not limited to Actualized.org content, but how does that tie back to this specific issue that some reactionary content makers make of Actualized.org? So, all of a sudden, when I'm going through a hard patch I conveniently forget there's therapy and emotion professional services that I can contact and go to. How is that @Leo Gura's fault when I didn't go and contact those services myself?

@Rigel How does that point justify @AdeptusPsychonautica's making defamatory reactionary content against Actualized.org?

@Breakingthewall I think the main issue is not that no one wants to understand or misunderstand his teachings, it's that some will try to weaponize and create a propaganda against @Leo Gura and Actualized.org content. I think the specific issue lies on those that give a bad faith interpretation of his content, and tell other people what they should think beforehand, which can be mostly misinformed, especially those who just want to profit from the money and attention and gossip that comes about. For example, almost all of @AdeptusPsychonautica's content is him making sensational content against Actualized.org, among other YouTube Reactionaries that latch onto attacking and defaming Actualized.org as their life calling, willingly dig themselves into a grave position of sunk cost fallacy that as time goes on will become harder to course correct. So, the real question, is that should Actualized.org content be allowed to be shown in YouTube? And should Actualized.org be held responsible even if with the legal warnings and disclaimers beforehand? Or, if you're willing to place restrictions on Actualized.org content, should there be restrictions of these types of reactionary content that defames his content?

@Thought Art So, if I'm open minded to new perspectives of Leo's teachings being dangerous, does this make me more open to influence by people who have a bias against Actualized.org? Is it solely because of @Leo Gura 's content and his delivery that makes this work dangerous, or the majority of people and some who are into personal development and spirituality that forget to check the description box for warnings and disclaimers, that forget to take responsibility for their own weaknesses?