Danioover9000

From an outsider's perspective. Again it's complicated based on other developmental factors like value systems, cognition types, moral frameworks, personality types/traits, ego development, other developmental paths in a person's life to societal domains, ideological beliefs and self biases. Even demographics and psychographics can vary, so it's not just elitist upper class right people who pedro, but also middle to lower class, male and female, all races, all nationalities, so on that that is also a systemic issue. Maybe the solution is to copy Japan's systemic handling of such people? Maybe watch more hentai and read doujinshi?

@Israfil I mean the very basic stuff, luke arithmetic or working in groups, very simple, bare minimum for society. Education is important for that, or bare minimum for university. Otherwise parents would be too stressed, providing and protecting, but now having to teach so many educational topics to their children, that is why teachers outside family exists, to take some of thag burden to teach the regurgitated stuff. I get the half truths and indoctrination. Not an easy solution to fix, as the first hurdle most people it collectives will avoid, admitting they fucked up and risking a mass hysteria.

@StarStruck Is that all Andrew Tate is just saying though, just let men develop themselves, become masculine and provide value? What about his many other clips of him being sexist and misogynistic and misleading, and him running an affiliate program scheme, and a shady only fans webcam girls he pimps? Are these fine masculine qualities for boys to aspire to? Since following the Tate brothers like a groupie, could you list what addictions, what type of depression, what business, what hobby you did? Can agree that some can learn from others, but have you learned the right lessons though?

@Israfil Oh I see, thought it was the other way around. Also, not just his ignorance, but even how he marketed himself as a TRANS MARXIST debater...that's a mouthful and loaded terms already, which already triggers close mindedness in the biased different person. Maybe the hero of the left? Even then, Charlie Kirk still, even if the leftist was solidly educated and communicating skillfully, would still frame him as a fool with a hysterical laugh, thought I was listening to the joker for a minute.

@Leo Gura It would be nice to see a Lex Fridman and Curt talk, see how different the two are.

@hoodrow trillson I can take this 2 hour podcast and shrink it into 2 minutes and show the errors of their ways. Imagine, in the comic book industry context the following roles: Author/writer. story outliner. cover page artist. pencil sketcher. inker. page and panel layout. letterer. editor. Within this context, the scientist/rationalist/physicist, IS EQUIVALENT to the editor role, whereas the philosopher/idealist/visionary being critiqued in that podcast, IS EQUIVALENT to the writer, sketcher or the page cover artist. The roles of the sketcher/page cover artist/writer is to lay the foundation for the coming comic book, whereas the role of the editors, the scientists, is to work with what was founded and established, therefore the roles of scientists and rationalists is mostly A posterior knowledge already constructed, versus philosophers that deeply questioned that actually did the work that these future scientists stand on.

@Blackhawk How could it be a perfect 50% fool 50% smart?

@Osaid Perhaps this is just a syntax and semantics issue between me and you?

@Leo Gura Yes, not disputing that he did a good job defending vaccines and Covid lockdowns in general as I mostly agree with him in that, just he was talking down a bit in general. That's fine for a scientist in his role. Just rubs the wrong way.

@Osaid Probably true, and I've consistently seen Neil behave this way, just look at the Joe Rogen highlights and the PBD ones with Neil, you'll see him consistently have this superiority complex with some light narcissism.

@Leo Gura Sure, but his delivery and behavior seems to me makes him more narcissistic, probably on the lighter side of the spectrum, just this 'I'm looking down on you' tonality and body language Neil's communicating. Not comparable to Logan Paul's or Andrew Tate's, but it's similar. Maybe it's the condescending superiority complex his tone is giving?

@Carl-Richard As a Mr. Girl fan, I agree the more narcissistically prone the person is, the more interesting they become. Neil is an exception though, maybe it's just my bias for the more hyper logical types.

@Leo Gura ?

@Socrates All I can say is: OMG SO TRIGGERED I LUV IT!!!??

Found a nice one, this time of a person who may or may not be hallucinating. Can understand and empathize: Although in my opinion, this video is a bit mixed and a bit messy, some of his talking points don't quite fit the argument and case he's building here, main one being the case of if she's faking or deceiving, or if she's genuinely scared and in actual stress, and there's not enough to back either angle he's taking on, lack of evidence and a lack of a convincing reasoning to explain he's assumptions. I think that the real reason why he made this video is clout chase and to act on a fad and trending social event when it's hot, and not to present a solid compelling analysis video, more like a wish washing case of 'IS IT GENUINE, OR IS IT FAKE?!' kind of video. Mainly because, from his body language analysis of dilated eyes/higher increasing pitch/blink rate increase/decrease as signs of likely deception by analysis/metanalysis despite disagreements, to bringing up Maslow's hierarchy of needs after giving a analysis based on her appearance, to even the lack of bringing up potential explanations that it could be related to mental disorder, this lackluster attitude of not being direct enough and establishing a stronger point gives this impression to me that this video may appear genuine but it's likely a cash grab for some hot trending topic in social media events. I guess to me how he sequenced these points and how he presented them, this neutral false objective looking presentation, just FEELS WRONG, and presenting it this way weakens any case he's trying to build for or against the possible explanations he's tackling here: is she being deceptive or being real and genuinely reacting to a dangerous threat? IMO she's more likely being genuinely reacting to a threat, in her perception, versus her faking, very likely some hallucination or, more rarer, something only she can see appeared there, that is causing her this level of distress that actually exists that most people there. because of genetic makeup, brain structure and hardwiring, and other factors, are not as responsive, in fact a bit of a rant here this is the more creepier part of the video: A COLLECTIVE BYSTANDER EFFECT AND APATHY! Like not 1 person attempted to engage with her, not even a stewardess or some authority figure, all just looking on in apathy, as if waiting for her to piss off. Bunch of losers.

@gettoefl @Israfil has this to say about schooling: Although in the technical sense I'd disagree because all the basic skills also come from the education system, some needs to be taught.

@Israfil I partly agree, but I do feel like not only was he and the other uneducated but both are being bad faith. You can tell from the discourse that the main goal is to convince and persuade by attacking and demonizing the other side. Very little attempt to being good faith and trying to learn from each other, the symptom of today's increasing polarization, and other negative developmental factors.

Has anyone watched the film yet? Please spoil the movie for me.

@Yimpa Are you referring to me? Or your daughter?

I just don't get why this movie is such a big deal, and why the mainstream media quick in condemning it as Quanon conspiracy peddling?

To a video that I don't like in terms of presentation: Important to note the main context here, and the biases and narratives being argued for: to create discourse in viewers about revenge, to create more sympathy for this murderer that slowly killed three men using a knife, and plotted this revenge for 22 years, whilst having maybe this stage green value bias and maybe anti capitalism bias too so there's a bias in favor for this Cuckoo person slightly. Based on Spiral Dynamics stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, 9 stages of ego development, In this framing, her tonality around word choices, body language and expressive gestures of her hands, shoulders and face starts to make slightly more sense. Honestly my first body analysis and first impressions I just didn't like her tonality and video presentation, too much edits and cuts, certain looks to her left to a person out of camera which I REALLY WISH I COULD ALSO SEE!(PBD has multiple cameras and does show even the producers and editors at another table), and overall felt manipulative too much, like she's trying to persuade me too much to feel sympathy for this murderer I'm sorry, but if both versions of the story were true by the Wang family, that the mother instigated this little conflict by spitting at the son's general direction, the son's reaction is valid as it's almost universally disgusting to be spat upon. The Mother technically started this event, so really it's specifically her fault in this segment, even though there's prior contexts and build up of resentment between the Z and Wang family over wheat contracts. Overall it's a messy situation with no clear winners and I don't know who to belief as this is all coming from a rotten Mango's perspective. I also don't detect defensiveness in her body language, but deception signs there were a few, and again the jump cuts may have been her hiding signs I don't know, but those moments were she closes her eyes too long, moments when she flutters and blinks too much, looks generally upwards to access her brain's visual capacities, these moments are just signs that she's processing a visual memory/imagined visual, don't know as it's straight upwards. And her tonality...can someone tell me her dialect and accent? Is it a Beverly Hills, Hollywood type? Some PLEASE TELL ME! This tonality is just annoying, the sounds of a rotten mango LOL! And those who object against me for having little empathy: I partly agree, I understand and do have limited empathy for this murderer as I don't have the exact traumatic situation here, but my first priority is to seek help and to do the inner work, to let go of this event in my mind because I know too much about how vicious the revenge cycle can be, because it's my responsibility to look after my physical, mental and emotional well-being as well as the remaining family members I have. A close second or tertiary, and this is coming from a more psychopathic perspective and more perfectionistic one, is if all that fails, then I'm plotting that 22 years of revenge to NEVER GET CAUGHT, Mr. Brooks style, so no I think it's pathetic that it took you 22 years and you haven't plotted the perfect murder, sorry you suck, coming from a more stage red organized crime angle there's so many ways to do a perfect murder. Took 22 years(Could also be a crime of passion or crime of opportunity as well so there's some leeway here) to only get caught and get sentenced to death, sorry but you are accountable for murdering those three men, you deserve that sentencing. I guess I'm just built different and relative to this guy, and I'm reacting negatively to her attempts to manipulate me into feeling sorry for this murderer.

Nice video covering the UFC's future competitor: Of course, based on Stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, ego development, life experiences and other lines of development in life and society, ideological indoctrination from upbringing and culture, and self biases, replacing one thing with another that is very similar yet has few advantages doesn't really do much to solve the deeper issues found in modern martial arts and the commodity of it. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS?

@hoodrow trillson So true!

Here's the podcast: On the fence with this one, can't decide as it's 50/50 deluded takes of a situation plus slipping in anti capitalist and anti government assumptions. Also don't vibe with the presentation as I like to also see the other person she's talking to, don't know just the body language is giving me mixed signals of untrustworthiness. What are your takes on this socially and the government's actions? Like it's the CCP, yet when giving that package they acted like capitalists as well, so what went wrong here? Also, what's your take on this revenge quest? Personally can't definitively say what would exactly happen to me and my state of being if faced with some fucked up situation like this, but after thinking and visualizing this situation many times, in most cases I'd let go of it and move on because I'm already that strong to let go, although when it's really fucked up I don't know I'd still go through the grieving cycle and emotional turmoil but mostly come out the other end with some forgiveness of those that did me wrong.

@StarStruck It's complicated, based on developmental factors like stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, ego development, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development per life-society domain, and ideological beliefs in your mind. Also, Just because @Leo Gura would have to defend himself from a murderous psychopath /=/ his philosophies including spirituality and alien consciousness and other complex modals of reality and psychology go out the window. There's a mistake in assuming that one's behavior must always align with one's belief systems and their justifications. No, actions can diverge from your said beliefs systems and justifications, so @Leo Gura defending himself isn't a contradiction, but rather out of love he defends himself from this imaginary psychopath because the psychopath is part GOD, Leo is part GOD, and this imaginary self defense situation and all it's experiences is part GOD, so there's no contradiction but only what is assumed and projected by YOUR EGO MIND!