Danioover9000

@Nabd Just like Leo said, what else can you do when Zionists keep land grabbing? What would you do if your friend keeps on eating your stuff, even if you've warned him many times in the past?

@PurpleTree It's very true, ask Covid-19 why it was so brutal in infecting.

@PurpleTree Your immune system, viruses, bacteria and fungus are more brutal than Americans, western Europeans, Eastern Europeans and the middle east. White blood cells don't have the death penalty and other human mare violence, they just travel, detect a pathogen, then surround and kill.

@Leo Gura already had a video on the different names of God, how god is described in his Islam video. Also, Etymology*.

@Yimpa I see I'm influencing you a bit.?

@Andrey Why should/shouldn't I complain, based in this video? Plus, anytime I'm about to complain? What if I don't have a phone or computer nearby, so I can immediately view this video a millisecond before I'm about to complain?

@Leo Gura I was going to bring that up, yes the Roman empire and the Carthage empire were warring for 700 years or so, and it was so bad that Rome wiped out Carthage complete as an example for other polis to not mess with the Romans. So complete was the destruction the the Roman scholars were the only ones who written and told of Carthage.

@BlueOak By the powers of logic and imagination. Unless I'm charismatic, persuasive, and attractive enough to gather blind support for my ideology to be the leader of a new world peace order? Yes I've seen a feminine public speakers few times. To clarify on my post, when I said I as a female, it's sex biology female, when male/female is used it's referring to penis and vagina, the human adult female/male body. When I say gender roles, it's a social construct, like traditional gender roles, woman rules the kitchen, man serves the army, woman cook meals, man fix roofs, that social construct. When I said stepping into a masculine gender role, I've seen so far the average public speaker of passion were males, mostly in motivational speeches, or galvanizing the army, so I admit my sex biology first, then assume I'm changing my personality to fit a leadership role, AKA Margaret Thatcher or Queen Elizabeth, but because I'm leading a new world order, and historically speaking Nazi Germany came close to winning WW2 if it made more strategic decisions in the war, and it's mostly traditional/conservative society and country, that I imagine myself as a super strong yet beautiful trench coat wearing feminist. That's why I chose this example to portray to you, that despite how extreme this hypothetical is, it's possible with right contexts and conditions. Also, we've seen the majority of history, especially military history, that most enforcement arms for society were men, and that if women did lead, with the Feminism ideology, they'd probably reduce the enforcement arms of society. I see you're getting upset, so I'll clarify my position in this thread and the above example further. I saw @StarStruck's title, and took his logical construction. I assumed an arguer for anti feminism, of whatever role he's in. I constructed an argument from Star's view in a stronger exaggerated position. When you replied to my post, I decided to present this argument to you and see how you'd take it, seemed like you took it too personally, so I'll let you deal with @StarStruck and he'll pick up on the sexy Feminazi leading the world order hypothetical, okay @StarStruck?

@BlueOak So, 'if women ruled the world there would be world peace' is a false statement by OP? Where in my post did I assume the women are feminists or militant? I stated 'feminism' meaning not just women, but men, children, ghosts, robots, or aliens that have feminism ideology, the ideology itself is what I refer to not the person. The person is being used as a proxy for the ideology. When I step into a career or position, I inherently have to adjust my personality to the role to be effective? So, as a female, stepping into a career of a politician, into a position of a passionate public speaker, adjusting my personality into a masculine gender role to suit the image of a strong leader, wearing the trench coats, leading the third Reich, with feminism style, due to how beautiful I am, is this the most effective for world peace?

@BlueOak I still think that if women ruled the world there would be more chaos, because if feminism ruled the world, they'd defund and destroy the patriarchy and cut down on enforcement arms.

@An young being Please elaborate.

@Schizophonia I am proud of flexing my tier 3 cognition intelligence. Why not you? I wish more people loved to understand minds.

@StarStruck ????

@StarStruck Exactly, all based on developmental factors like Spiral Dynamics stages of development, cognitive and m0ral development, personality types/traits, 9 stages of ego development, Architypes, and shadow work, other lines of development in society and life domains, ideological beliefs indoctrinated by culture, family upbringing, mainstream/alternative media, news outlets, social media, tv channels, radios, news papers, peers and teachers in education system, and many more information gathering points that influences one's self biases and preferences and internalities that are feedback looped by externalities. Also based on history, and geographical limitations, as well as biosphere/hydrosphere and atmosphere differences and limitations.

@Vrubel By HAMAs or Israeli soldiers? Link?

@Leo Gura True. It's like this logical problem: In a room with 10 murderers, you come in a kill one. How many murderous remain? Most people can't answer that right, but Chat GPT 4 answer "10, because by murdering you become a murderer yourself." to paraphrase it's logic. Chat GPT get's how complicated and serious that puzzle is, and maybe how relative murderer/not murderer is, but apparently most people don't, hence 80 years of Israel/Palestine conflict. The oppressors/oppressed, You did it/no you did it, it goes on.

Interesting video:

@Nabd But protesting is a good thing no? If you lived in a world where protesting peacefully is illegal, rioting and looting is illegal, and worker unions is illegal, then there'd be no more weekend offs, or holidays, or paid leave, or weeks of vacation. Do you see the consequences of your wish and how predatory capitalism companies and big tech or big pharma could make you work 9-5 with over work, or the 9-9-6 worker lifestyle in Asian countries for everyone? Even if it maybe immoral to protest peacefully the support of killing civilians, that's a small price for democracy yes?

@Nabd Okay sure, now I know what you mean. Although this isn't an argument for taking away their right to protest though right? If you ar arguing for them not to protest peacefully, don't you see how that's now an autocracy you are arguing for? Even the moral and ethics of that are questionable, but legally speaking it's important for them to protest peacefully, or form worker unions or stuff like them. Do you understand now?

@Nabd I'm interested how this event would effect Joe Biden's votes for the next presidency, I can see a fuck up being just enough that it may effect his re-election into the white house.

@Nabd I'm just commenting on your post that claims their collective egos are blind. I'm elaborating on your claim in that reply. I'm just specifically disagreeing that the news footages you've posited, they are mostly peaceful protests in the USA and UK, yet to devolve into rioting and looting. Do you understand my point?

Why zig-zag you bitch hag? You think that you got the tricks and treats when you shaman? Objectivist? I object, you just an unjust obtuse fa* time forgot zit. For you too lost and gone, in the matrix and lattices of minds, these reasons that are treasons to begin with! Benign bitch, handle your own itch you scratched in! Damn, reading the Destiny report, bubbles up orbs of dark beneath the soul! Monetizing crazy open relationships you craven, ship in, then ship out the ravens, just for the clout you date Annas, when they cra cra banana, you bandana wagons and bankrupt/bank out their moral integral characters, I naught or ought or ought to attack, like a Santa Clause a present for this maggot that loves SEXUAL ABASEMENT, while bicycling town bicycles, Mr. Bi-sex or poly that time? Do we need a polygraph to graph you as a sociopath you whack hag?

@Nabd I disagree, I think this is mostly a peaceful protest and democracy doing it's thing as usual. However, yes collective egos have blind spots, but collective egos have it's will powers and intelligence for it's own survivals. Just in this specific instance, protests are just as peaceful as the protests that BLM movement did in the USA so far in western societies, 93% peaceful with 7% rioting and looting by ANTIFA.

You can ignore me all you want, but my argument still stands true, even if I become the elephant in the room.

@StarStruck I think I disagree with the premise that 'if women ruled the world there would be world peace'. As an argument it's weak due to the vast history of chaos and disorder from irrationality and hyper emotions coming from women that is countered by the logic and rationality of men. This is a stage green shadow and stage green projection onto a complete egalitarian and altruistic world order, meanwhile disregarding the necessity of men in the lower stages of development in stage orange and blue to counter men from stage red/purple or even other stage blue nationalists and religious nationalists and racists and ethnocentrisms. This is like trying to establish a matriarchy when we have mostly patriarchy in place, and assuming there'd be no culture warfare between the two hierarchies vying for establishment power. I also think there's a slipping of extreme feminism and man hate in that premise, demonizing men unnecessarily, therefore I declare that whole argument a 'grotesque theoretical fantasy' of the highest delusional sort. There cannot be a healthy society where the structure favors far more one side over the other.