Nivsch

I want to show that science tries to communicate us the truth with external language that itself creates a closed loop. I want to show that its never gonna solve our root inner problems - depression, anxiety and more mental problems, because to solve this we have to turn inwards and learn ourselves independently without any language. The problem is, that people can comment me and write: "But there are already psychological therapies. We can go to a psychologist and he will help us to go to our root problems in a direct manner trough conversation. So science is not supposed to solve our root problems, because for that you have the psychologists. So in conclusion, our culture is good enough in solving your root issues, we already do that. And psychology is even can be seen as a part of science. Because the therapies today are part of investigations, learning from mistakes and improving all the time. So you dont really have to go beyond language, as long as you have the right therapist. Language can be enough!"

Yes, but in a sense of finding the root of your emotional problem - maybe transcending language is not at all a must do to achive this.

The thing is - how can i explain that getting beyond language is also important to threat problems in life (that 99% of them are interior)? But - i have to say that i am not sure that transcend language is necessary to self develop and threat mental issues, because you can still do inquiry about your past (using thoughts and... language) and reprogram your subconsious mind and cure emotional problems. So in one hand i want to show the limitation of language (at least in the gross version - science, "proofs" etc that cannot solve our internal issues) but in the other hand im not convinced that language as a whole (english, hebrew...) is not enough to cure your issues because maybe it IS enough.

Well its very hard to REALLY re-invent the wheel. So almost everybody, even very advanced ones, at most bring the issues from a new and fresh angle of view, and in new style and if you also make it accessible and apeal to young people, Like Leo does, this is for itself a great thing and not for granted at all.

Thanks! ?

Improving relationship with people as a whole (in non-romamtic relationships) and understand them better? 2. Is it helpful to be more attractive to someone you want romantic relationship with (cause you will understand his language)?

Wow great example!!

Anxiety, OCD, Cyclothymia etc And to make yourself (with this work) develop to higher conscious stages (stractures).

Is it good enough that the name of the channel will be my own name (Niv Schleifer), or another name? Because there are a lot of singers (I learn singing for 5 years so far) that their channel = their name and they are very popular. I want to mention that I dont want that my channel will include only singing videos of me, but also videos in which i talk about my insights and what helped me the most in personal development, and introduce my opinions about things and make my own voice and my personality being heard and give value and help others. Also I am highly interested, and I am very good at (because I have been learning it for years) Meteorology and I want to introduce it to people because almost nobody really knows this subject and it highly interesting and magical when you know it. In summary, I have at least 3 topics which are equaly reflect my deepest interesting topics (not to say I cant discover more in the future) but It feels quite clear to me that at least these 3 topic i want to introduce in my youtube channel. there is not one topic which is above the others and i just can't choose one. The all three are significant. So i want to incorporate the all three in my channel. Having said that, is it enough, if i want popularity, that the name will stay my own name or that it will be a new brand name which covers and connecting the all 3 topic?

when I know that some perspectives are obviousely come from lower consciouseness positions. For example - conservatism, racism, anti LGBTQ rights or In his family, boycotting someone, overchasing money, overmaterialism, thinking that animals are less valued than human etc. If I know that Green point of view are (not without limitations but) more superior to materialists or consevative point of view. How can I ever be "multiperspectival" and objectively examine every pov. When I know it feels fake and I cannot really do this, cause I know that materialism and conservativism povs are just lower in consiouseness and less right. Yes, we still need more basics povs to make balanced and healthy life (transcend but include), but still, I really can't see how the almost-hegemonic superiority of green can be broken. The only place I really see the urge nessesity of tier2 thinking is in the individualist plane - self actualization, independent thinking, developing consiouseness of your root issues undelines your anxiety and depression. But in the collective plane i cant be symmetric in the way I examine every perspective. I feel i just know who is more right in political debates. One of the examples in stage yellow video was "yellow person examine both anti and fore slavery before he decide" come on! are we cheating ourselves? Its obvious that anti slavery. There is no REALLY probability to answer differently. LGBTQ full rights obviousely is the right thing. Animal abuse against no animal abuse... of course no animal abuse. "OK but we need to think systemically and not do things to bring ourselves 'conservativism backlush'". Not true in my opinion. If we want green population become yellow we need to just let them do their green things to the edge. Anyway only then they will learn the lessons authentically. therfore to summarize: In the individual plane - tier2 is nessesary. but in the collevtive plane - Just be green and balance it a little bit with the whole system during the time. what higher places we can really get in the collective domain?

What the Taliban and humanism, non-violence, emotional intelligence have in common?? Its like to put olives on a bread with nutella.

@Lento Even IQ of 2000 is still doesn't raise at all the chances to be yellow. IQ is a pure orangic concept ?

That cannot be right in any universe. Taliban in their barbaric ideology are RED-blue. They know how to manipulate trump because they have overlap with trump in red. 0% yellow.

@Serotoninluv @Lento @Aquarius @Nak Khid@Key Elements @Nickyy @remember thanks all 1. Why yellow won't see purple as lower than green? 2. What manipulations he can do? As i know, yellow won't manipulate the system

? Not in whatsapp thats for sure ?

Maybe yes

@Leo Gura I want to show at least an intuition of why it is limited. I said that math is like a machine we input it and gets outputs and again input and this creates a closed loop which makes us overlook intuition, senses etc and dont think for ourselves. And that it like thinking in a closed pipe streams without see outside of these streams. And then I gave them first technique - observing thoughts and emotions (havent publish yet).

@Skanzi thanks! Interesting. But if a therapist is able to find with you the origin of your beliefs than you can both transcend those and really solve emotional issues. I believe there are therapists who do that, but maybe its a minority of them.

@SaaraSabina the questions there are so obviouse ??‍♂️

Yes, yesterday

Actually my goal in the video is not proffessionaled and detailed analyze science, but more in the bottom line general line of that thing, to rise the consciousness of my facebook friends and my youtube chennel (small, yet ?) audience. And im doing ir through introducing the SD stages. Right now i thinking about stage green part B video, and want to show them the problem with materialistic logic thinking and why this thinking cannot solve our root personal problems, and therefore have to go beyond language (what new age's center of gravity wants to teach us). But the problem is that people can write me that "Language is enough and we dont need meditation and self inquiry because there are psychologists and with them you can go deep enough to core issues. So our culture right now is good enough! So you dont have to go beyond language at all."

@wk197 No. I'm 32 and i'm attracted to 18-30 year old boys. And yes sometimes to 17 and 16 but its illegal so i dont try (and also its too much mentally different). I try only 20-30 ages. So what, i'm a phedophille? No. Dont get triggered by stupid toxic definitions and judgments. Is it legal? You love each other and develop each other? Thats it. All the other stuff are nonsense.

@Nickyy but isn't multiperspectival is a yellow quality? Green, for what i know, thinks that the others political povs are less right than him. Which is right ?

@Nickyy yes but about the TRUTH itself, (politically and socialy speaking) green is far above the others. I agree the forcing and pushing is wrong in most cases, but in the other hand if we won't push the orthodox sector to accept gays more (campaigns, social pressure...) many ultra orthodox children will suffer because of boycotting by their family. For example.

In the individual domain i think that tier2 approach is critical to solve personal problems like emotional, and quality of life as a whole. But in the political and social domain I see green as the hegemonic as the truth holder. Like it has 70-80%. And 20-30% to all the rest povs altogether (orange and below).