integral

That did not explain the exact intelligences that make someone good at chess, it only reiterated your world view. Judit polgar was part of a family of 3 sisters whos father thought them chess at a young age, Judit reached a top rating of 2735 that is 100 points away from Magnus Carlsons top rating of 2882. She achieved that rating is a male dominated player pool. Seeing how 1-3% of chess players are woman we can clearly see that if more woman played chess we would have some amazing top performing chess players emerging. This clearly shows that what people think is "male intelligence" is there inability to understand what intelligence is and a stereotype gender bais projected onto it. "Irrational" emotionally immature woman can still be good at chess. This should shatter any concept people think intelligence is and how it applies to chess.

How do you know what baseline intelligence is good for chess? If you listen to Magnus and Kasparov speak there not that intelegent. If you listen to bobby fisher speak that will really blow your mind of how "unintelegent" someone can be and still be good at chess. The measurement of intelligence is not that simple and from knowing how chess works i know woman can do it.

I think you need a more solid morning routine. Consider optimizing.

I not citing studies, I know how learning works, IQ has nothing to do with the problem. Woman drop out rates are higher then mens so that indicates a motivation problem, where is that coming from? Woman are literally not showing up as children to play and learn, why? If we got more woman to play the game and keep playing it we will get more GM woman players. --- Edit I've personally played against woman who where clearly highly emotionally unstable and childish overall still manage to play fantastic chess and get a higher rating then me. This stuff is not simple to understand.

Reading does not increase IQ. The active effort of problem solving increases IQ. Reading might raise linguistic intelligence and comprehension skills. Regardless the first chess rating I received was 1100 and in the process of a year and half it kept going up with deliberate effort and self-development mindset until I stopped playing at around 2200+ 2 years after I started. Training plays a massive role. I can take anyone and get there IQ up to 120+ its not that hard. They need to have 1 attribute and its the desire to do so. Where are the studies of them training people to raise there intelligence? If i wanted to i can get a IQ of 200+ on does ridiculous tests just by practicing taking IQ tests. So how this translates to chess is if you practice you improve.

Alot of the time people can feel like there ideas are a reflection of them and so when someone suggests alternatives ideas it can feels like a personal attack. Ideally the person introducing new ideas has to communicate it in a non-violent healthy way. When men socialize they tend to require alot less filters and speak more bluntly while when speaking to someone more sensitive its better to first address the feeling dimension. In general the premise of the conversation has to switch from "these are my ideas and does are his ideas" to "we are exploring ideas together".

I can, i see a guy making 100,000$ for every youtube video he makes. Hes distributing pennies.

Men in the population are going to be in career positions or have hobbies that will train there IQ more so they will perform better on does tests. If woman received that training they would represents higher IQ rates. Chess drastically raises the IQ of children, male or female. Its like "hey you been training your entire life for this test, take it and lets compare it to people who have not done that training". Basically what that statistic shows is that if you train for something you get a better performance.

Around 2200-2400, if chess was something I cared to improve at it will likely be higher, I havent play in 15 years as I have other things that i want to focus on.

Again your falling into the trap of gender reductionism and not looking at culture and social drives. If you look at black culture in the west there is a strong emphasis on basketball while white people have a stronger emphasis on soccer, hockey and tennis. So we get alot of black people playing basketball disproportionately. Its like how religion spreads. That does not work because what matters is the emergence of new players, what is being underrepresented is the woman who would of been prodigies are not discovered. If out of 1000 kids 10 are woman, and only 1 out of that 1000 develop a actually career playing chess or is a prodigy, it will likely be a male. If the distribution of kids is 500 males to 500 females and only 1 is a prodigy who develops a career in chess then the odds of that person being male or female are closer to 50/50. If we factor in gender differences maybe the odds are 55 to 45, in favor of men.

The ultimate orgasim is awakening and one day youll save the world one orgasm at a time. ?‍♀️Buddha was a Prince after all.

The issue is woman have a seperate chess league with a separate rating system that is significatly easier then the mens division. The main purpose is to get more woman interested in playing chess. What will likely happen is a trans-person will become the top female chess player and its a bad look. Again it comes down to statistics, there are way to many men. Ok in this case it still makes sense, because its a man having a "womans title". But because of how rare it is they should just let it be.

Ye I suspect they changed there parking lot management to something that maximizes profites.

I just experienced this today, I parked at a familiar parking lot that ive been parking in for over 20 years, never have i gotten a ticket, today i had to drive my gf to the clinic and that parking lot is right there, it was nearly completely empty. I left for 15 minutes and got a 70$ ticket. Looking into it seems private parking tickets is a billion dollar industry. Its very common to have a hospital or clinic right near a private parking lot that if you park there and go the the hospital they immediately give you a ticket, the second you leave the parking lot.

Was looking at Epistemological paradigms and was trying to place Leos. Its not Empiricism Its not Rationalism Its not Deconstructionism? So is it Experientialism?

@Swarnim ???Never looked at it this way, so good.

@Swarnim you seem to be a big brain kind of guy, best course of action is to start bodybuilding to build a respectable posture then run for India presidency and change the world. This is destiny.

@Princess Arabia Have you considered doing spiritual sexual education workshops or sexual energy healing kind of alternative adult industries? Title of the Ad could be: Orgasmic Mediation Workshop with Princess Awakia, https://www.youtube.com/@shaftuddin/featured This guy seems to be into this kind of spiritual adult industries work. He gets paid to give woman tantric full body orgasms.

That data does not represent the real world, your in a scientific ecochamber.

Let there be light, amen.

There's always a opportunity for regression, keep your hopes high

I said it in the context of, "got to be a fool not to appreciate that beauty". lolol

Maybe Unfortunately he will always use the word "Spiritual" randomly during a 3 hour video, that can trigger orange.

I used to also be like this, what causes the change is when you suffered so much and have to truly face death that you finally stop giving a shit about the small things and see how utterly meaningless all these things you where holding on to. That life is hard and we are all a team. We are all in this together awakening. You forgive yourself and others completely. Creating love for all forms of expression. Sounds like some green non-sense, but hey people need to awaken to green some how...

Im sorry but your a fool, no hard feelings.