integral

@LastThursday @Lilia That makes sense guys, actually i just noticed something and was wondering if you guys can do it to. If try to read the text on this page in French, all the words automatically translate and become French in my head. My inner voice is French but what im seeing and reading is English. This is INSANE, never did this before!

Disclosure with KRS-ONE - 30 Minutes of Truth Infinite Being in your mind Found this guy, thought id share.

Maybe ill rename the title to "Bad acting" mega-thread

Im not back, still doing a detox, just wanted to post this. The woman in the video comes off as very inauthentic and fake to me, does anyone else see it? Everything she sais feels like she is not being honest about any of it.

I know she is not being authentic because I am experiencing real empathy. Real empathy mostly comes from deeply understanding someone with out personal agenda or bais getting in the way. Personal bias doesnt happen because your present with your true self, a meta-self. In contrast her source of empathy is to look inside for a positive loving frequency/emotion and experiencing that emotion or to view life from the lens of the cosmos. A story of empathy, "we are all one" is a story until you actually awaken to it. If we compare the 2 methods we see the the second one is unsustainable when the person being loved does not reciprocate or does something "bad" as you'll take it personally. Green loves hating everything that isnt loving lol It clear as day that she is not being authentic because truly loving people don't act loving, it instead shows up in there words and actions in a authentic ways, look at sadhguru for example, is his personality constantly repeating loving affirmations, trying to guide people to a loving emotion? No! He says what is truly loving to say! Its night and day. The stereo type character of a person constantly saying loving things is not love! Its an act, a truly loving person is never loving on the surface in that way. its a bullshit mask. More importantly then all of this, I know she is fake because you can instantly feel it, if people are not feeling it its because they are out of tune with authenticity. When your being inauthentic with yourself you feel it strongly, its unmistakable. The same can be said when you see it from others. Authenticity cannot be faked and thats the purpose of this thread, it can be seen clearly within 20 seconds of interacting with someone. Its the reason people are fooled by fake gurus, why people cant identify a cult, why people have issues with leo, all of these are part of the same blind spot. A inability to see the blatant inauthenticity. Another important point is a inability of identifying inauthenticity is a reflection of ones naivety.

@acidgoofy @Princess Arabia Seeing as you guys both dont view her as inauthentic im curious to see examples of people you think are. Maybe you guys have a bais towards green spirituality and cant see how inauthenticity can show up. Inauthenticity can happen at any stage of development.

@Swarnim I watched a video on the value of authenticity for youtubers and how authenticity creates trust+bond that viewers feel and they keep coming back for. Authentic people just feel authentic, its the free expression of wtv they currently are. Woman are notoriously inauthentic at green by forcing positive vibe and feelings into there voice and personality even when there not actually feeling that or not embodying what they are saying, basicly your inauthentic when your lying to yourself. But paradoxically you can authentically lie about your feelings to others thats different. The teaching is good as it exploders the Descension/Body path of the Divine Feminine, something most men watching this video above are not comfortable with, at the same time she is not being authentic with her self. Her real awakening will come when she lets go of what ever it is holding her back from fully experiencing and letting in reality, right now its being strongly held back, she isnt really connecting with people deep down. I see it...

The character she is playing for the camera is the part that makes it inauthentic. She only speaks this way on camera. Shes not lieing about what she is teaching im sure she believes and is expeirencing it.

If we look at a flower for example part of the direct experience is a knowing of what it is and a understanding even of how it works. This knowing is automatic, there are no thoughts about it, its a automatic knowing. Its impossble to look at it and not know it. Its impossible to see or hear or experience sense with out also having some conditioned knowing. Its impossible to look at the hand and not know its a hand, that does not mean it cant change. Knowing can change, its constantly changing, look at something long enough and knowing changes to something else. Another person at a different stage of development or a cat or insect will have a knowing that is competly different aka interpretation. What im asking is, is knowing fundamentaly unavoidable and part of direct experience and even the knowing of "not knowing" is a knowing, because you know you dont know what your looking at. Knowing just seems to always be there. Is it fundamental? Is there absolute knowing? --- What im directly experiencing is anyting that is experienced is Truth. If its a thought, its truth, if its a wtv its truth. It doesnt need to be reduced or changed it just IS it always. The reason im asking this quesiton is in response to non-dual neo advaita stuff that is trying to define enlightenment as a specific state.

I just realized there are 500+ guests viewing the site daily who are not signed up. This is an invitation to join! Come and introduce yourselves. ?

Id like to start out by saying I can destroy Andrew Tate at chess and i didnt have a father who was a grandmaster to hold my hand and pass down his epigenetics to me. lol Actually I can pick a random human and train them in 1 year to be better then Tate (who has a rating of 1600). Hes that bad. 1600 is joke rating that the majority of woman can obtain. So Tates gender bias here as a man is ridiculous. The main reason Woman CAN compete with Men and why they have failed to do so up to this point is mostly statistical, the ratio of male to female chess players is 100 to 1 if not larger, so we get a massive under representation of woman competing. Out of the top 100 chess players, 1 is a woman out of 99 men. Tate and many top chess players like Kasparov have made the mistake of explaining this phenomena from a isolated gender difference perspective. Dont get me wrong there are gender differences that play a role but its counter-intuitive. Chess is not a game of bruth force logic, thats a misconception. It can be played from a strong intuitive lens that woman can excel at. --- Edit What is being underrepresented is the woman who would of been prodigies are not discovered. In a pool of 1000 children 99% are men.

Hey, so im going to go on a Dopamine Detox for at least a month. Here is a introduction video if anyone is interested: Full Dopamine Detox Protocol That means no social media including actualized forum. The purpose is to make productivity the only thing to quench my boredom. Im writing this to spread the love and for personal accountability reason. ?Bye!

@Princess Arabia oh no such a sweet heart. Reminded me of how on facebook if you try to delete your account they will show you pictures of your family and tell you that everyone will miss you if you leave, "are you sure you want to?"

Had to take care of some unfinished business. ?

??

@Osaid Dude when the minimalist take over the financial system does caves are going to be worth a fortune. Finders keepers.

Nice!

Im pretty sure Leo gets this. Why is he chasing deeper understanding? And also tell you your not awake if he had a chance to lmao

But practically speaking changing the channel to a person who thinks they are enlightened is what everyone does after awakening. Right now you think your enlightened and thats on screen but your also experiencing enlightenment and thats not on screen.

Everything is mind, actuality or reality is Your mind. Comprehension is contently changing but the act of comprehending doesn't. When we look at out hand and uncomprehend it, that is comprehension of no-comprehension. When in a meta-frame of understanding the nature of reality, that's comprehension. Its interwoven into the experience. --- Looking at the hand in silence with a meta-frame there also exists comprehension there. Comprehension is always there in every experience but what is being comprehended changes constantly.

I think that perfectly explains the point. Maybe a pointer that works here is the screen doesnt change but the content does and I am both the screen and everything on it.

lol to reply to my self, this is wrong as there is no direct experience of a sleep state. Im stupid lol Direct experience is both form and formless at the same time.

@Osaid Thank you for taking the time to explain your point of view to this length. +1 Are you saying that what I am is the never changing part in direct experience? The never changing part in every experience? That seems to be ralstons teaching here.

@UnbornTao @Inliytened1 omg poeple.. its a joke... also carl wanted technology... ?

?