integral

The character she is playing for the camera is the part that makes it inauthentic. She only speaks this way on camera. Shes not lieing about what she is teaching im sure she believes and is expeirencing it.

If we look at a flower for example part of the direct experience is a knowing of what it is and a understanding even of how it works. This knowing is automatic, there are no thoughts about it, its a automatic knowing. Its impossble to look at it and not know it. Its impossible to see or hear or experience sense with out also having some conditioned knowing. Its impossible to look at the hand and not know its a hand, that does not mean it cant change. Knowing can change, its constantly changing, look at something long enough and knowing changes to something else. Another person at a different stage of development or a cat or insect will have a knowing that is competly different aka interpretation. What im asking is, is knowing fundamentaly unavoidable and part of direct experience and even the knowing of "not knowing" is a knowing, because you know you dont know what your looking at. Knowing just seems to always be there. Is it fundamental? Is there absolute knowing? --- What im directly experiencing is anyting that is experienced is Truth. If its a thought, its truth, if its a wtv its truth. It doesnt need to be reduced or changed it just IS it always. The reason im asking this quesiton is in response to non-dual neo advaita stuff that is trying to define enlightenment as a specific state.

I just realized there are 500+ guests viewing the site daily who are not signed up. This is an invitation to join! Come and introduce yourselves. ?

Id like to start out by saying I can destroy Andrew Tate at chess and i didnt have a father who was a grandmaster to hold my hand and pass down his epigenetics to me. lol Actually I can pick a random human and train them in 1 year to be better then Tate (who has a rating of 1600). Hes that bad. 1600 is joke rating that the majority of woman can obtain. So Tates gender bias here as a man is ridiculous. The main reason Woman CAN compete with Men and why they have failed to do so up to this point is mostly statistical, the ratio of male to female chess players is 100 to 1 if not larger, so we get a massive under representation of woman competing. Out of the top 100 chess players, 1 is a woman out of 99 men. Tate and many top chess players like Kasparov have made the mistake of explaining this phenomena from a isolated gender difference perspective. Dont get me wrong there are gender differences that play a role but its counter-intuitive. Chess is not a game of bruth force logic, thats a misconception. It can be played from a strong intuitive lens that woman can excel at. --- Edit What is being underrepresented is the woman who would of been prodigies are not discovered. In a pool of 1000 children 99% are men.

Hey, so im going to go on a Dopamine Detox for at least a month. Here is a introduction video if anyone is interested: Full Dopamine Detox Protocol That means no social media including actualized forum. The purpose is to make productivity the only thing to quench my boredom. Im writing this to spread the love and for personal accountability reason. ?Bye!

@Princess Arabia oh no such a sweet heart. Reminded me of how on facebook if you try to delete your account they will show you pictures of your family and tell you that everyone will miss you if you leave, "are you sure you want to?"

Had to take care of some unfinished business. ?

??

@Osaid Dude when the minimalist take over the financial system does caves are going to be worth a fortune. Finders keepers.

Nice!

Im pretty sure Leo gets this. Why is he chasing deeper understanding? And also tell you your not awake if he had a chance to lmao

But practically speaking changing the channel to a person who thinks they are enlightened is what everyone does after awakening. Right now you think your enlightened and thats on screen but your also experiencing enlightenment and thats not on screen.

Everything is mind, actuality or reality is Your mind. Comprehension is contently changing but the act of comprehending doesn't. When we look at out hand and uncomprehend it, that is comprehension of no-comprehension. When in a meta-frame of understanding the nature of reality, that's comprehension. Its interwoven into the experience. --- Looking at the hand in silence with a meta-frame there also exists comprehension there. Comprehension is always there in every experience but what is being comprehended changes constantly.

I think that perfectly explains the point. Maybe a pointer that works here is the screen doesnt change but the content does and I am both the screen and everything on it.

lol to reply to my self, this is wrong as there is no direct experience of a sleep state. Im stupid lol Direct experience is both form and formless at the same time.

@Osaid Thank you for taking the time to explain your point of view to this length. +1 Are you saying that what I am is the never changing part in direct experience? The never changing part in every experience? That seems to be ralstons teaching here.

@UnbornTao @Inliytened1 omg poeple.. its a joke... also carl wanted technology... ?

?

Even if it starts as lust and attraction (how most relationship do), it doesnt stay that way. Not every situation is predatory and manipulative with age gaps, people can be lonely, they like the attention and how the other person makes them feel. People think these age gaps are not "real" relationships, there is no way to enjoy the company of someone who is not around your age, they think there is this massive mental gap, when in reality most of them are not like that, they are normal relationships because the mind of a 16 year old is really no different the most adults. Most adult relationships are extremly immature. Thats the comparison people cant see. So a 25-40 year old can date a 16 year old and find alot of common ground.

@LSD-Rumi Holly shit if i wake up right now from this salvia trip ill never be able to recover.

New people signed up!

Ah ok it makes sense now, I like the other comment on Ken Wilber not sure you read it? It covers the slow transitioning to embody these realizations after the first awakening. I feel like your saying once you realize it, thats it. If so how?

@ZzzleepingBear @gettoefl @Ajax @LastThursday @ivankiss @Javfly33 @HMD Hey sorry guys for not responding Im struggling just to write 1 response lmao, If you have stuff to add to the other comments, please join in.

Understanding/Comprehension/Knowing is Being because its a part of direct experience. Wtv the comprehension of a flower is, is actuality and it can change and that to is actuality. Interpretation = changing of form, actuality is always changing in form that is interpretation. A flowers physical appearance can be the same but it can be comprehended differently, that is a change in form = interpretation. Knowing or Comprehension is what is shaping formless. As the comment above your ^^^ Thats what I think is going on lol

@something_else Its like they think 17 year old girls are sexually innocent.