integral

@questionreality I'm talking about probabilities I'm not being judgmental. I'm fully aware of not judging a book by its cover except there's a pattern where you can judge a book by its cover using patterns and probabilities. Yes there are exceptions. If you do brain scans of conservatives versus liberals you can see that the conservative brain is structured differently you could actually make a prediction with 99% accuracy if someone is conservative or not. The same goes for facial structure and a bunch of other external patterns that represent themselves in the real world.

I have a lot of experience and I can assess someone lightning fast, eventually you see enough patterns and you interact with enough people that you understand how their mind works and how people present themselves reflects their mind, the red flags showed up in her pictures, both those pictures were a red flag. I also have the premium information that she's dating Tristan Tate. Sexy pictures is not a red flag the problem was the style and facial expressions, the second picture was like a mannequin. That means she's attracted to this kind of aesthetic, that kind of aesthetic represents a specific mental state.

LMAO yes because I'm basing it off compatibility. I get it she's not a zero physically...

The Kingdom of Trump Pizza, wielding a Greatsword in pure Glory 2024

Black Pizza Human Incubator

Alien Pizza Pure Joy

ARE YOU SATISFIED. EAT UP. Granny Hair pizza

The girl he showcased the first five seconds of the video I consider a 0/10. So if your goal is to attract a zero follow his advice. The issue with that girl is she’s primarily operating from stage red and lower emotional primitive reasoning. So you’re dating a nightmare human being that you’ll have no connection with or any meaningful depth to the relationship with, The relationship will be held together by external factors like duck tape.

If you pull the pendulum to one side too much you’re setting yourself up for a swing back to the opposite direction. Women are not objects to bear the burden of your love. Loving someone the way they need to be loved is love but loving someone because you need to love them it’s not. You can find someone who is equally into you as you are to them and who has the same values of love longevity. But in my experience if you need to love someone then you’ll inevitably push them away. To love someone the way they need to be loved takes a lot of delicacy and it’s nearly impossible to truly do that if your ”Madly” attached and dependent.

Men look for sex objects, women look for success objects

@Inliytened1 The scariest thing about imagination is that it’s real 😅. I think we need a misconceptions about imagination video

If everyone died I would feel a huge sense of relief because I no longer have to bear the burden of Everyone’s suffering.

I wouldn't want Leos genetics, the cost was to high.

I’ve been looking for solutions for days but as of now it’s not that great, a human is still going to outperformed Ai at content creation. in the very near future you’ll have a personal assistant built into the computer that acts like a human that you talk to and that will perform tasks for you directly in whatever application you’re working with. Intelligent enough to learn and do video editing on its own.

Poisoning someone with heavy metals is an ingenious way to legally kill someone. A even more ingenious method is to just give someone cancer, how would anyone know that you were involved. Cancer is a socially accepted way to die no one would suspect a thing.

It’s all true when i used to watch porn I would see sex objects everywhere but now that I stopped I see imaginary objects everywhere. 😂 The potential of the plot twist.

That’s a great question, if each atom is forcefully separated but has the potential to return to normal if the force is released, is that person alive or dead? Or does it exist in a state of potential aliveness, is it’s soul free or forever stuck in the potential state. Lmao does it merge with the Godhead on separation or remain a finite experience as separated potential aliveness.

@Lila9 I know we’re about to make all of Gen Z immortal. 🤣 Immortal tick-tock

Logic has anything to do with this statement. It’s not about logic it’s about you have a premise that the more something works the more it ages. The issue with this is “what is work?” is gravity holding your body down a type of work a type of stress on your system? is that work bad or good? This is the main issues some work is good and some work is bad. Some stressors are good some stresses are bad. So the logical mistake is all work = bad. While in practice in the real world some stressors are good for you and a necessity and some stressors are not and contribute to age. So now you need to revise the logic to remove that assumption.

The logic is correct if you overwork it it ages faster but also if you under work it it ages faster, so you have to work it at a healthy level the way it was designed. People don’t know where their limit is and how do you know if you cross the line into the overworked domain? The system is built to work and it is in disfunction if it works too little or if it works too much. if we somehow isolate the heart in a jar and just pump it non stop Will it age faster? Probably, maybe, maybe not let’s experiment. But you can definitely reverse ageing in the human body including the heart as long as the heart is still attached to the system. how hard something is working is relative if you’re comatose in a bed Then your heart is not working very much but if you’re exercising very slightly then you’re working 10 times harder compared to the comatose person, In this relative situation working harder equals longevity. So at the very least your logic doesn’t take into account relativity and is trying very hard to overgeneralize and reduce everything, ignore context ignore all systems and is attempting to conquer the universe with a general rule that applies with no exceptions.

Ill slowly skin you alive and you’ll have your answer. Imagination and real are the same thing. There is no difference.

i’m in a situation where anything I say to anyone is for the most part viewed as intuitively wrong. Anything I say comes in to direct conflict with their intuition which is based on standard cultural truths or “common sense”. i’ll point to something explain exactly what is going on and no one believes me. They will regurgitate the obvious wrong answer and fail to see the limits of their own intuition. Intuition is only good within the domain for which deep work and effort was put. It’s the output of the models you’ve built for a thing. It’s also significantly improved with deep inner work by thinking about thinking giving insights into how your own mind works and how to optimize it. This is all so basic but I have never met anyone In real life that cares about truth, they all think they do but it’s actually a representation of there lack of self-awareness. i’m sure you guys have had similar experiences. How do you guys handle being gaslighted every day by everyone? I don’t judge them but at some point it’s just tiring in the long term.

@mmKay that’s a reasonable take Lol The situation I’m in is when I interact with people we form a connection very quickly and it always leads to them opening up and telling me their life story and their issues and whatever else, like I’m taking the role of peoples therapist automatically or people feel comfortable talking to me about everything and that will naturally end up leading to possible solutions! In the end they don’t wanna hear the solution, like how do you tell someone with two failed marriages Who is desperately lonely and desperately seeking love that The reason these women are avoiding him is because he can’t control his emotions and he’s dumping his emotions onto everyone around him and he’s overly verbal and communicates too much every little thing he feels to everyone. A girlfriend is not your therapist do not put your emotions on to them they can barely handle their own lives. The repulsive thing that he is doing has to now be spoken about. The only loving thing to do is to point them in the right direction. it’s not that I’m forcing opinions onto random people it’s that they’re dumping all of their emotions on to me and then while we’re connecting I’m like OK let’s Play a completely different game! Why are we playing this game at the lowest level? All ego problems are solved by more consciousness! Let’s crank this shit up! I need to figure out how to keep conversations light and about humour And avoid somehow connecting with people lol 😂 that seems to be the general strategy other people have recommended so far lol Maybe there’s another solution every guru has the skill of converting an idea to a piece of candy that’s easily consumable. I need to learn to make candy lol

That's actually exactly the technique I ended up using is where I just give people hints and I hope they eventually make the connection but the thing is it is extremely difficult for people to make a connection between two things even when you spoon feed it to them. Like it's a insane superpower to make connections between two things outside of there box. Insights happen often when making observations over time and eventually a pattern is formed through the observations and then you see something hidden right in front of you. But that Insights cannot be taught to anyone unless they're awake to the process of insights.

Seeing as two people asked I'll just provide an example, my aunt takes thyroid medication every year or two they increase her medication whenever they increase her medication she has severe panic attacks for about 4-5 months, this connection between the increase of the thyroid hormone and the panic attacks she is not able to make. The process of making the connection between these two things she's not capable of doing. Whenever she's having panic attacks I ask her did they recently increase your medication? She says yes, she then dismisses this simple connection because "I trust doctors and who are you?". This exact pattern has repeated itself for the past 20 years for which I've been keeping track of about four to five instances where I ask her the same question in the same situation, every time she has panic attacks I asked her if they increase their medication recently she responds with yes. It is a very clear consistent pattern, the process of making this connection is too much of a mental leap for this person. She never has panic attacks at any other point in her life. A basic Google search can connect anxiety and panic attacks to hyperthyroidism, this is not a unfounded claim. The conversation is also open-ended I just asked a question she then contemplates it and sort of dismisses it as a possibility and nothing more and doesn't really want to think more about it because there's no way for her to validate where it's true or not. So it's like I asked the question a connection is suggested between the increase in hormone and the panic attacks but then she takes this possibility and does nothing with it because she has no way to validate it. Then she forgets entirely and the next time it happens she completely forgets the conversation we had completely has no awareness of this connection. It's a baffling thing when someone is not in the process of making sense of anything they actually just forget everything. Forgetting is a powerful devilish defense mechanism. Another example is the air at my father's house causes me a sore throat within 30 minutes of being in there, within 4 hours it causes both my kidneys to hurt (do not deny my experience of this I know exactly what kidney pain is in this body). So I decided to investigate to figure out what was causing it and I discovered that because he uses bleach in his laundry machine and his laundry machine is poorly ventilated that the chemical is actually coming into the house and filling up the entire building enough to smell it in every room. When I tell them this they actively deny smelling it, they simply cannot smell it and they are incapable of understanding the simple connection of how airflow Works in a house and how anything related to inhaling this would directly affect biology and that it would create the sore throat. They also actively deny my direct experience and physiological symptoms because it's to Strange for air to create a sore throat in a person especially when no one else as mentioned anything in their house and they cannot smell it because they live in that house so they're just used to the smell and toxic effects on their body. I also explain how what they're inhaling is directly affecting their state of mind and putting stress in their bodies but this is far too complex for them to understand. Also communicating to them that my kidneys hurt is a astronomical concept that they have no idea any human being is even capable of detecting, like higher levels of body self-awareness is not something they know exists, so when I communicate that I can feel things they don't believe me. Another thing is whenever my mother drinks coffee in the morning she becomes noticeably agitated and she has a very specific emotional state she enters into because her cortisol levels go up too high, its too much stress on her system because she's 63 and she cannot drink coffee like she used to when she was a kid without any consequences. Explaining how coffee is not a beverage it's a stimulant that affects the system is too complex, and more importantly they are incapable of making the connection between the coffee and their emotions. This connection between two things is too much of a cognitive leap to make. On top of that when she drinks coffee and experiences a stressful event during the day from the external environment she gets a sore throat. This sore throat is directly related to stress and not sickness. She mistakenly Associates the sore throat with " I am catching a cold". While I repeatedly explain to her that it is not a cold she's catching it is the accumulation of multiple days of stress and poor recovery. I've carefully observed this pattern over and over and over again and carefully kept track of the circumstances, you're going to speculate that I might be wrong I'm not this is a very clear pattern that I've observed in isolation over and over again. My solution instead of convincing her is to switch her coffee to decaf and that solves the issue. The examples above are in the domain of the practical I rarely say anything that is outside of that to people around me because it becomes a battle of opinions where they are not able to see how to figure out which perspective is more conscious, they just default to their own perspective using the technique of out talking me and ranting. Like if I tell someone that the only way to get out of their situation is to follow a path of self-development, it's just too hard to convey this to someone within their attention span and within a conversation where they expect entertainment not insight. Of course I should merge entertainment and inside but I'm not that skilled and most people are stuck in their ways.