integral

All good I was responding from the previous frame that people set me up for. That I’m a lowlife lol it makes sense to collect data and then create a correlation between appearances and mental states and then we can derive some kind of pattern. If we just do something superficial like spiral dynamics generally stage green is gonna look a specific way and stage orange will look a specific way and stage blue can look a specific way. Aesthetically each stage of development has a different preference but there’s plenty of variation within each stage. It’s not black-and-white. Stage green is less likely to wear make up but that doesn’t mean they don’t wear make up. We can further use a different model and then make a correlation between the big five or MBTI and start drawing patterns between what they wear and how their mind works, we could further draw patterns between someone’s genetics (facial structure ) and how their mind works. None of these are absolutes but there’s enough patterns that we can start seeing a correlation. So if you went through your life trying to find these patterns eventually you’ll see them and you can start making judgements from probability. So If you were just gambling where would you place your bet? You want concrete data but it doesn’t exist yet I’m just speaking from my own connections I’ve made consuming media and then connecting all the models to all the patterns. it’s a safe bet that Tristan Tate and the ecosystem he is surrounding himself with which is club girls and strippers and cam girls are going to be at red or orange and unlikely to have certain degrees of self development. for all I know they could turquoise but how likely really is that? I said that she 0/10 based on my personal preference which is only based of compatibility. I personally don’t care what someone looks like I would have sex with anything that moves. I only try to assess people based on my compatibility with them and not based on appearances which is the exact opposite of what Im being accused of lol. I also said that she’s going to be an emotional nightmare and that was to paint a picture of the type of relationship Tristian Tate has with people that he builds off of a superficial empire. I’m not saying she’s actually like that I’m just saying the 10 /10 automatic knee-jerk reaction and sales pitch is deceptively not true. His relationships will also be superficial most likely, maybe I’m wrong maybe they’re the most fulfilling relationships these women have ever had. But again where are you gonna place your bet? If you attract women with a sociopathic strategy what kind of relationship are you really having with these people? What kind of people are you attracting? Let’s go back to concrete data in the near future we can train AI models to go through all the content of the Internet and then fact check this kind of broad connection. We give it the task to make a correlation between someone’s appearance and their mental state. The result will be some kind of appearance versus mental state percentage with a list of thousands of different connections. Example: porcelain doll picture -> souvlaki cultural exposure -> sexual development stage two -> spiritual development stage one -> personality type (esfp) -> SD red -> anima development stage three -> … We could have infinite metrics and each one will have some kind of percentage of how probable or how common the relationship is. AI will open up the floodgates for pattern recognition. We can invent many insightful models just by analyzing the Contant that is already present on the Internet, it’s just up to this point we had no easy way to do it at scale. AI can understand meaning which means you can start making deeper connections between seemingly unrelated topics at scale.

I know guys It’s not black and white. Just general connections one out of 1 million Fair enough, you would need a little bit more context.

@Schizophonia we disagree on how relationships work. Relationships require adaptation and it’s only harder if the gap is bigger it doesn’t matter how enlightened you are, your energy will be drained. We are not compatible with everyone.

I’m attracted to highly emotional even unstable woman. Sexually they turn me on like crazy and it makes it super good. 😅 and the relationships are a nightmare.

@Schizophonia what your attracted to and what’s good for you tend to never be aligned. when dating women that don’t have the same values as you it ends up being a game of you constantly having to mask and adapt to them and it’s rarely the case where they have the self-awareness to do the same. Some women like the one in the picture I think would work out financially very well if they’re independent achievers in real estate for example, but other than that it would be very tiring being exposed to them every day. People are tyrannical about their world views and you’re gonna be hit with it constantly all day why would I wanna subject myself to that? I say that from experience, I don’t at all need to be exposed to undeveloped operating systems every day it is beyond exhausting. 99% of people don’t even know what self development is and it sucks interacting with them. I’d rather be alone I rather have silence.

In his latest on stage talk he stated that Tesla is on the road to making over 1 trillion a year that is the estimated revenue he predicts when Tesla robots start being mass produced. Tesla will possibly see a 10% market saturation for Humanoid robots. The humanoid robot industry he predicts will be massive. For every 1 person on earth there will at least 1 humanoid robot in operation if not more. The average cost for one of these humanoid robots will be less than 10k, so it’s in a affordable range. The next 10 years is going to be very strange.

@zurew I agree that’s The right way to go about it. But then who really cares I’m not being serious about this assessment. This was not about assessing someone I’m just pointing to general red flags and I’m trying to reframe this woman is not the pinnacle of woman you want to be dating. 0/10 is for shock value, explain that what you think is a 10 is probably not someone you actually want to have anything to do it. Strippers look like 10/10 it’s a deception. All of this is so basic but you’ve turned it into a witchhunt for misogyny and judgement. A Guy showing off his Ferraris and telling you he’s gonna make you millions it’s a safe bet he’s scamming you. Tristan Tate is showing off one out of many girls he’s having sex with, that’s the context is this girl the 10 out of 10 that he’s telling you? Probably not.

sure date the girl that spends two hours in front of the mirror to do their make up and spends 200$ a week on hair and nails. I’m sure those are the values you’re looking for when dating. I’m not compatible with most women that behave this way, there are exceptions but I’m not going to rely on that. How is it possibly the opposite? Should I go to the strip club and date does women because it’s probably the opposite? Where are is it OK to draw the line here?

Definitely agree with that lmao

@Schizophonia I don’t mind a good witch Hunt, burn me at the stake. Judging someone based on their looks is not 100% wrong. Society has a oversensitivity to judging women, i’m not being misogynistic to the degree that this witchhunt is based on. I don’t think I’m smarter than the girl in the picture stop rejecting misogyny. I’m talking about values. I did not say I don’t love these people. Notice all the projections how you were conflating a lower position to a higher position. i’m not talking only to you anyone who read the other thread thinks I’m a complete jackass because there conflating everything with stereotypical misogyny.

So what did you forget? You forgot The beliefs that limit you. That’s why they limit you. You forgot how you constructed other. You forgot that this is a life. You forgot the chair you’re sitting on right now. You forgot that you are god. You forgot that you invented forgetting. You forgot your mother while reading this post. You forgot that THIS exists. You forgot your reading. You forgot infinity. You forgot infinitely.

Perfect example

@tuku747 im crying it’s just to good 🤣🤣🤣

🤣😂 this is genius

How are you filtering out scam artists in business? Your got to make rational judgements based on many factors, Its the same thing with dating. If you see an Instagram post of a guy with a bunch of Ferraris selling you shit Are you going to do business with him? All the red flags are there are you going to do business with him? The point of my post was to explain how you got a filter out 99% of women you’re not compatible with and how else you gonna do that. If you’re not generalizing to narrow down to a potential match you’re gonna date a bunch of people you’re not compatible with wasting a lot of time. You guys misrepresented everything I said and misinterpreted as a kind of negative judgement. I did not make an absolute statement about that woman I’m just making a generalization to help people understand you don’t wanna be dating these Women that look like they are webcam girls. And that camgirls are not 10/10 because of personality trauma and a bunch of compatibility problems. Have higher standards. I was trying to explain that him presenting a woman as a 10 out of 10 is a scam sales pitch that woman isn’t the highest pinnacle of a woman that you could be dating because it’s subjective and most people on this form or not compatible with this type of woman. It’s gonna be a nightmare.

But you can become more conscious, so if you’re 100 times more conscious you can be 100 times more conscious of the absolute and 100 times more conscious of infinity. Infinite awakenings. You can’t get more absolute that the absolute but you can’ be more conscious of the absolute and you can’t get more infinite than infinite but you can get more conscious of infinite.

I think we should call it the law of forgetting. Makes it easier to remember that I forgot. Lol

Are you living in a Third World country mostly in the conformist stage of cultural development? That’s an interesting experiment where you take someone who fundamentally cannot stop judging and you put in a position where they need to be nonjudgmental 😂, so they’re taking their education and then reframing it to suit their worldview and to interpret from their worldview. They don’t know that they’re interpreting and they don’t know that they have an agenda and they don’t know that they’re being homophobic. The Cherry on top is that society validated them by giving them a status position as a doctor or physician. Have you asked them why they’re homophobic seeing as you’re paying them by hour? if you ever try challenging someone who has a sense of status over you it never ends well. They’re easily insulted.

I tried eating the diet for a week and I got really sick, for some reason that lentil dish drains all my energy.

@questionreality My daily argument quota has been reached, im a devil 👿 have a good day.

Source Youtube Moving directly from Red to Green without Blue results in a lack of social cohesion and stable relationships, this is something we're currently seeing in the new generation where green has created a echo chamber to allow kids to bypass blue entirely and go straight to Green. And so we have a generation of people who are in a self-serving mindset and don't see the communal layer of working together. This is not a new pattern, feminism is something that pops up over and over again in Cycles throughout all of human history. And every time there is a collapse back down to the lower levels all because green prevents the lower generation from learning the rules of blue, which they then eventuall learn to break them in a healthy way and go higher into green. Basically the new generation never learned how or why to break the rules of blue, and so they were able to bypass it entirely. And it's grossly obvious when observing at the average hypergamous woman. --- Transcript We might be stuck in a pattern of civilizational collapse, and it's because our relationships are not as strong as they used to be. This video is a long-overdue answer to the question: why is promiscuity bad? The answer is kind of complicated. Let's start with this: why would promiscuous behavior, as pictured here, cause a collapse of civilization? I put together this map. It's originally created by Ken Wilbur. This is just my easy-to-read version as a quick reference for developmental psychology, how people's minds develop individually from birth until wherever you stop, and how that affects the development of society and culture. Over here, there's this little grid that shows the individual mind and culture, individual behavior and society. The way that people's minds work is going to form a culture. The way that culture works is going to shape society. The way that society works is going to influence your mind, and the way your mind works will influence your behavior. All these things are interrelated. So, society, which we depend on for everything we have, is based on the way that we relate to each other, which is falling apart very quickly due in large part to the acceptance of promiscuous behavior. There's a bunch of little heartbreaks and lower relationship strength. Our relationships also suffer because we don't understand each other, and that's something you can fix. Today's sponsor, Ground News, can help. You are on the internet right now, so you're confused. We all are. Algorithms make us feel bad, blame it on other people, and then attack them like idiots. This is not making us smarter. We need perspective. If we remain unable to understand each other, we tend to do what we want instead of thinking about what's right. Basically, when people are allowed to do whatever they want, it degrades us from this stable model of courtship and relationship formation to this unstable one. In the old one, we could have stable marriages that were enforced by social conventions. In the new one, there are a few guys who get all the attention they can handle, so they don't commit to women. Therefore, most of the women get played and dumped over and over, and these guys get no attention. That makes everyone unhappy, and it's also really bad for stable marriages that produce children. This model is only possible when people believe, "I can do whatever I want, and you can't judge me." If you allow people to behave like this, then they stop building this, and it turns into this. Modern people believe that the world is made of individuals. It is actually made of relationships. In the same way that a pile of bricks is not a building, in order for the building to work, the bricks have to be arranged in a certain way; they have to be connected. Once the bricks start saying, "I don't want to be part of a building anymore, I want to do me," then the building starts decaying. Then the other bricks say, "Well, if you're not doing your job, then I won't do my job," and we go from a building to a pile. A big part of this decay is the sexual revolution, which is actually just a decay. It's reverse development. We are going from higher levels down to lower ones. I've been over this in previous videos. This one's called Saturday Scaries. Basically, all cultures have to grow through these levels. You can't skip stages. When a culture develops from this low impulsive stage to the rules and roles stage, they come up with strict social norms. They eventually grow to the achiever stage, which is like corporate keeping up with the Joneses, and eventually into this sensitive individualistic hippie stage where people start saying, "Hey man, everyone's unique, and we should all do what we want, bro." At that stage, they have a tendency to get rid of the rules at this stage. Then all of the new people who are born—because everyone's born at stage one—don't have any rules to learn to grow up to the next stages. It causes developmental arrest, and people get stuck down here. That's what we're experiencing right now. This is not moving beyond the rules; it's just getting rid of them. Way back at the beginning of my channel, somebody asked me, "Why is promiscuity bad?" I didn't even have colored pencils yet. There's the old version of the drawing. I think she thought she got me. I don't think she expected this as an answer. This perception has become really common, and ironically, it's coming from a really high level of development. What they're saying is that we should all be allowed to do what we truly want and be who we are, and society's rules are just holding us back from our true selves. That might be true if both you and your partner or partners are at this level, but that's really, really rare. So if you are a young person growing up and you hear that message, that society is just holding us back from what we really want, you're not going to hear it at this level because you are not there yet. You're going to hear that message at the level that you are on, and it's going to sound like everyone else is trying to get their own way, so I'm going to get mine. The more that gets reinforced, the more you stay stuck, unable to learn the belonging and cooperation skills that are necessary to keep moving up the ladder. In other words, if you want people to develop to these higher stages, which we do, they have to learn the rules before they can break them. If you want to do bike tricks, you have to start with the basics. You want to be a jazz musician? Start with Hot Cross Buns. Again, this message, it's saying, "Why bother learning the rules before breaking them?" and it's leaving a lot of people stuck. Those stuck people will not be able to keep civilization functioning. We have known this for a long time. Back in the 12th century, some guy named Salahudin Ayyubi, Liberator of Jerusalem—though that's probably debatable, but he sounds important—said, "If you want to destroy any nation without war, make adultery or nudity common in the young generation." Sound familiar? This is from a website called Muslim Skeptic, and they need your support. Apparently, relying on Allah alone is not working out. The Muslim world is very much concentrated at this level right now—the rules and roles level, the control of self and others through faith and discipline level, the fundamentalism level—and that's because they experienced their own collapse a few centuries ago. I just spoke to Rudyard Lynch of What If Alt Hist about this. Check out his channel. He explained to me that history does not work like this. It's not, "Oh, feminism was invented yesterday, and now everyone's going to be happy forever." There really are a lot of fluctuations between feminine and masculine control of society, and if you get too far in either direction, things get bad. The Islamic world went too far in this direction and had an overcorrection, and now they are still hanging out up here. Some of this even happened recently. This was Iran in the '70s, and so was this. They look like they're from Wisconsin. That was before the Iranian Revolution. Let's not forget Afghanistan then and now. This lie that the more feminist things get, the happier everyone's going to be, just is not real life. In reality, hyper-feminization causes its own problems, and the reaction might not be fun. What are these problems caused by glorious feminist freedom? Well, as women become liberated from men, which means getting materials that men produce without having to marry them, women experience a greater ability to choose, and they no longer have to settle for someone who is exactly on their level. Women become more free to pursue somebody who might have a full dance card and might not be interested in anything long-term. This matches the results we get from dating apps. Women seem not to be very interested in most men, at least not until women get to know those men. This more equitable style of pairing off is what happens in tight-knit communities, but those tight-knit communities come from living at this level, where the mentality is to do what is right in order to get what is good in life. Nobody wants to do that anymore. They'd rather do what they want, and doing what you want means that nobody has any say over whether or not you stay in your marriage but you. So as soon as it feels bad, you're going to leave, and you're going to jump into this disaster where you're going to go look for the best you can get. You're going to convince yourself that this guy almost married you even though he didn't. This leads to a small percentage of the population—mostly the powerful, smarter, and richer guys—winning, while everyone else becomes less happy. People at the sensitive individualist level wanted to move beyond the rules and live their best lives, but they didn't realize that you still need some structure. All the messaging coming from media, universities, and culture says you are a special, unique individual, and nobody should be able to tell you what to do. As a result, nobody is learning the basics of how to be part of something that works. It’s all about "me, me, me," and that’s what’s killing us. On the other hand, China has actually increased its marriage rate for the first time in nine years. How did they manage that? The government has been campaigning to promote marriage. What this does to the minds of Western women is something else entirely. Yes, even Grandma. These are all just TikToks that I collected over time. They were all very popular. This is what women are saying to each other. Here we go. A woman says, "All that work and what did it get me?" because she pulled her celebrity crush and doesn’t like regular people anymore. She pulled her celebrity crush but could not keep him because she's not at his level, and now that is her new highest setting. He’s all she can think about. Here's another woman who wants to replace her current guy with the celebrity crush, even though he was never going to commit. Here's a woman at her bachelorette party in 10 years, planning to leave a man at the altar if her old flame comes back. Another woman says she's forcing herself to go out with a good guy while waiting for the toxic one. Almost all girls have that one guy that, no matter what, if he were to text her at any point, she would be like, "Yes, let's be together." There's always that one guy. It’s either history or he’s just everything she wants, and they’re probably not together and don’t even chat. But the minute he does, she’s ready to be with him again. This girl talks about comparing everyone else to this one guy. She had a situationship with someone she bonded with so well that it changed how she views romantic partners. Now she talks to someone new and thinks, "Yeah, but they’re not him." She doesn't even mean to do it, but it naturally happens. This other woman can only talk about the one time a homeless guy took her on a boat. This is how much women love the guy who is never coming back. They prefer him to the guy who proposed twice. I have been the guy who’s never coming back. There are girls I could have called whenever I wanted; I just didn't want to. So, the point is, when people stop following the traditional paths of relationship formation and marriage due to the prevalence of promiscuity, it creates instability. A few men end up with many women, while many men end up with none, leading to widespread unhappiness and societal decay. Without the pressure and structure of traditional norms, relationships fail to form stable units necessary for a functioning society. The shift from collective to individualistic thinking erodes the foundational relationships that hold civilization together, leading to its collapse.