integral

I don't see how this fits in a larger framework. You're going to have to at some point unify all your insights into one unified framework.

If you want to have this conversation start a new topic, this is not the place. There's a lot thats involved with sex and it's not black and white the way you suggest.

@MsNobody I experienced many years of health issues, and during that time, a person came into my life who, in a very short period, destroyed my body with permanent damage. It took me years of rehabilitation to regain any quality of life, and during that time, I held a lot of resentment. But after a while, I realized that life was never going to be perfect. I was never going to have a perfect life; life was never going to play out as expected; life was never going to be as my ego desired it. It was all shortsightedness and ridiculous expectations that I needed life to go in a very specific way. After that, suffering still happens, but you just don't care as much that you're in pain or that you're suffering. It just bothers you far less. This moment and life were always going to be a impermanent huge mess. It was never anything else. It's messy, dirty, and ugly; there is beauty and love, and that's all part of it.

I’m sorry to hear this, i’m surprised that you experienced such a difficult childhood because you seem very healthy and grounded overall. Why does something that happened in the past still play A role in your life today? You physically distance yourself from it (New country). What are you holding onto? Why does it have a meaning in your life or why do you put meaning in it if it happened such a long time ago and experienced by a completely different version of you.

LMAOOOOOOOO reminds me of the intro to a Fast and the Furious movie if it was produced by a Porn studio on LSD. It sounds very high quality like a studio production for a Blockbuster movie.

So this is the illusion of a paradox, it's not actually a paradox. Part 1) If Pinocchio says "My nose is about to grow" -> if he is lying -> then it will grow => Making the statement true but he still lied. The statement becoming true in the future does not mean he didn't lie. HE STILL LIED... So there is no paradox. Part 2) If Pinocchio says "My nose is about to grow" -> if he is mistaken -> then it will not grow. Lying is an intentional Act. If he makes an incorrect statement it will not grow, ignorance does not cause his nose to grow. It is the intentional Act of deception that causes it to grow.

Pretty much everything could be written in text, this type of communication is sufficient. Unless you want the exact image in your mind to come to life then a brain computer interface is not needed.

@Shodburrito the problem in all of your posts is you're not Steelmaning the position. You start off with a false Foundation of what the opposing party's worldview is. And then you build off of that so the whole thing is completely off the mark. Take one of Leo's videos, Steelman it and then add your perspective.

Pinocchio's paradox IS NOT The Liar's paradox.

@Hojo @UnbornTao I think you guys are on to something. It looks like the mistake everyone is making is they think "Pinocchio's nose will grow if he says something false", "Pinocchio's nose will grow if hes wrong". They misunderstand lying as saying something that's true or false. People say things that are wrong all the time without knowing, and none of them are lying.

Somehow Neil deGrasse Tyson has such a poor understanding of psychology he doesn't know what lying is. 🤷‍♀️ Most people are so blind they don't know that this is not a paradox. --- If I lie about something but then it happens to become true in the future by accident, I still lied... So because he lied the nose grew making perfect sense. The cognitive fallacy is that they think because it became true then he wasn't lying. Do you see how foolish that is?

I smell a postmodernist.

Masterpiece

This one has potential but there is no way to change it so its dead, reminds me of Naruto https://suno.com/song/312f7428-94dc-4c4e-b6e6-48ddf9aba60e?sh=iOw7FxCJmPNsge6y

I think it will make us more creative, most of the problem is that it's very challenging to get anything done, if I want to make like a 1-minute video it takes me 10 hours minimum and that's for something easy to make. If I want to make a video game it's going to take me years. So the barrier between imagination to creation is going to be much smaller, and people could focus only on the Creative Vision and the quality. The reason everything is so Bland right now is because it is very time consuming to make anything of quality, so no one does it.

I take one of Leo's video scripts, then I compress it with AI into lyrics, that I modified the lyrics so that it flows well. So it's AI assisted + human. The hard part is getting a good audio generation, its random, got to play around with many genres until one stands out. You could get free AI video clips here if your interested https://sora.com/explore/top

https://www.actualized.org/insights/leos-chess-games-09 That queen trap was insane , what a sexy move

@Yimpa LOOL you beat me to it, I wasn't going to post it because it wasn't good enough lol

You figure out all of this stuff automatically as you go You’re trying to get a girlfriend and you can’t so what do you do? Self-development. You’re suffering and you don’t know why? And you want to stop suffering… so you seek a solution? The guru is just giving you a solution. Thinking you “deserve” a girlfriend is incel mindset. Instead of focussing inword to grow, they blame externally their problems. Because the world owes them something apparently. They are incapable of self development. The guru is telling you that in order to solve your problems you have to grow up.

1> The problem I see with the speech is I don't understand what he's saying. The intellectual level is too high. You need to have a degree in politics to know what he's talking about. 2> It's too flat, there isn't a correct storytelling strategy. Leading up to a conclusion that sticks in the mind. Everything Trump says correctly tells a story with no intellectual burden needed. 3> His talking points are focused on how horrible Trump is or other people, instead of focusing on what he is going to do. Trump says very clearly all the things he's going to do, Bernie never does.

Bernie has never made anyone feel anything, ever. How could he possibly win? He's boring when he speaks and you don't quite know what he's saying and you need to use more brain power and effort to concentrate to know what he's talking about, so that's a failure at Charisma and clarity. He also does not have leadership vibe or masculinity vibe. It's a lost cause unfortunately.

I know that's my point lol, I added the "rational" word because I was imagining if Kanye West ran for presidency he probably wouldn't get far.

@Raze what you're saying is that cultural shifts are occurring and that's why people voted for Trump? think about it in the same way social media works, who gets the most up votes in social media? Videos that incite emotions, videos that are highly engaging, videos that are highly controversial, videos that are highly addictive. Trump hits every nail on the head. He even shows leadership. Bernie hits none. Bernie shows absolutely zero leadership in his vibe. No one felt anything ever hearing Bernie Sanders speak. If you can't incite emotions then you get no votes. Kamala Harris shows absolutely no leadership in her vibe, she comes off as a masculine woman. The only reason anyone voted for her was because they hated Trump, and when that's your only Edge it's pathetic. Both Kamala and Hillary come off as super masculine women, why would anyone want that? It turns people off. They're better off being in feminine energy. Be authentic and you will get votes. But these people behave so obviously disingenuous in front of the camera you could tell that they're not acting like real people.

I agree with the message but looking over all of this and analyzing with AI I feel like they said nothing that actually mattered. Leo says it's about Vibe and culture but I disagree on the culture part. I see no culture at all. If Arnold Schwarzenegger ran for presidency he would easily win. There would be no contest. Because he behaves in a rational entertaining way with good talking points. While these politicians talk in a obscure unclear manner, confusing, they're not entertaining. If you can't Entertain You Can't Win. Bernie Sanders has 0% chance of ever winning because his Vibe is wrong, it's so obvious. If he had more masculine energy and could give a convincing statement without stumbling over his words he would have a shot Think about politics like trying to get laid with a woman. You need to have charisma, you need to make her laugh, you need to make her feel like you have your shit together and there's some fantasy about you.