Inliytened1

I hear you brother but what's the solution just keep everyone who is already here here and then close the borders or leave them wide open?

@ExploringReality I see a few good things coming from his Presidency though. I think the increased tarrifs will eventually cause more factories to be built in the US and I think the immigration laws needed to be tightened up. Open borders wasn't working. Abortion laws also needed tweaking. Outside of that..those are the only positives. Internationally when it comes to wars he has not been the presence everyone thought he would be. Russia is doing what it wants and so is Israel. Inflation is still sky high but that's because of the tarrifs and they were high with Biden. But the stuff you mentioned is really negative. We have to vote democrat coming up. As long as they aren't going to completely reverse what I stated above. I do not agree with deporting everyone point blank so I think they went too far with immigration? Maybe find a middle ground. An illegal that's been here 20 years doing good things for the country shouldn't be kicked out. I think a review needs to be done.

Perfect description. Haven't heard better.

I am with you i think it's an abuse of power but it is within his power by law. Trump is a snake that will slither into every possible corner. I was against him deploying the National Guard to DC but I guess it ended up not being such a big deal.

Well..the thing is its rarely used but..and this is from AI: Yes, a U.S. President can authorize the National Guard to stop protests, but the legal authority to do so is complex and has been a subject of significant legal and political debate. Historically, the National Guard is controlled by state governors. However, the President has the power to "federalize" a state's National Guard unit, placing it under federal command, especially under the Insurrection Act of 1807. So this is what he has been using to deploy the National Guard to states and overrule the governor there. Antifa is a real thing he just throws it around whenever he wants

@Majnun hehe. Good call. I wish him luck but he has to watch falling into beliefs about things especially solipsism.

He is of course using it to score points for the right but what do you mean by eradicating the first ammendment? How would he be stifling your freedom of speech?

You're not too paranoid we already have and use CCTV everywhere to solve crimes and such. This would just solidify it. We already rely on it heavily but it's not enforced so it has caused us to miss solving many crimes where camera systems weren't working in establishments or on streets. So I think it would be a good idea. As long as it was used for good. If you wanna watch a good show on how CCTV has come to the rescue it's a show called See No Evil on the Discovery channel. One of my favorite.

The only objective thing about reality is that it's an absolute relativity.

First of all did you have any type of direct realization or mystical state of consciousness in which you realized you were alone as God? If you havent then you are taking it as a belief. Dont do that. Assume otherwise. If you have then you won't remain in that state of consciousness. You'll fall back to a normal state of consciousness with self and other and it will be easy. That's my experience anyway.

You have a specific lifestyle that one is supposed to live on your mind and therefore you think Leo is lacking in some way because he isn't living this particular lifestyle. I actually salute him for not being the norm. Thats not so easy to do. What he will miss out on are certain experiences like being a father. Having kids is an amazing experience but that doesn't mean it's a requirement.. Your life is no less significant because you didn't see the Eiffel tower in Paris. It all comes down to experiences in life. But you can't miss what you haven't known.

All you have to do is imagine. Very easy.

There is no objective reality.

Trump changes hin mind when the wind blows.

I guess we won't know if he's lying or not because Hamas won't give the rest of the hostages back. If they did that and then Israel continued the onslaught i might give your argument some consideration about him lying. But the lines have been drawn.

You already had your mind made up anyway.

The problem we have with this argument is Oct 7th. This made it a conflict.

Looking into the hearts of men is a difficult thing. Also he did say that it was the vote of the parliament not just him. I watched the video and let my intuition speak for itself. I didn't feel that way. I felt the centuries of Jewish persecution in his words. But maybe we are both looking through a finite, bias lens.

I already presented a counter argument to the premise of genocide there and all you can say is Netanyahu is a monster and that they are. So he's lying about everything. That's your argument? Ok. Well if that's what it is that is fair. As for Kirk I already said I think his arguments held no merit I'm not sure what else you want me to say. I don't agree with Kirk on most things.

You listen to too much leftist propaganda. Your mind is now corroded with leftistm. In summary you just have to watch where the left goes too far .

It wasn't like that. It wasn't a concept. The ego is what actually fights against it

Well the bullets had anti-ice on them so again...this speaks volumes. It's like when Robinson's casings had anti-facist on them. So..of course in the end it is subjective..but i think these things contribute to the mindset and views of the shooter. It's pretty hard to deny that they were crazy yet rational enough to carve these things into the bullet casings. It is not really that clear if you really look into the conflict and the history of the conflict. The scorecard.

I already answered that: I'll give you this. That is a brilliant spin. Maybe you should be an activist like Kirk was 😀. But no..nice try. One of Kirk's strengths was gaslighting. You're not going to convince me that Oct 7th was Israel's fault or that they intentionally let it go on for a certain period of time. Nice try though. Conspiracy theories are welcome. I'll add to that by saying "it wasn't a government traitor or government infiltration either".

I dont understand the question the video you posted doesn't pose this question did you mean in another video?

How would you know when you cant get through his speeches.