Inliytened1

This video is a joke and I've heard it before.

@Sincerity I think for @Carl-Richard he is very triggered by the concept of solipsism. Its understandable given how twisted it is. But that's just him. He gets very bent out of shape as soon as you speak the word.

I just want you to be happy. I have found that when you are so awakened things become too mundane for you and it is difficult to survive that way. Just be happy

Well since @Carl-Richard didn't bless us wirh his brilliance i will explain why the shared dream does not work. it doesnt work because there would have to be someone to oversee it. To supervise it. To make the connections. Way too much trouble. Its much easier for God to just be a singular mind and imagine everything. Its no less real.

@Carl-Richard nothing from you on the shared dream theory? Are you even an idealist? Meaning..I don't want to label but do you believe consciousness is fundamental

Right. Separate consciousnessnes. So think about it. If it's consciousness how could God make a shared dream. It would not be logically possible.

The forum @Nahm set up.

yes i get it do you want a prize? Shall I doordash you some pizza? You are absolutely right. I just hope that you realized it for yourself and not from some external source. I know that you didn't. The problem i have with you guys is your flexibility. You become so one sided its becomes very difficult to even conduct a decent conversation. That's why being on Phil's forum is like talking to a bunch of robots. As I said..embrace the ego. What the fuck else is there while your mortal. You wanna sit here and play God yet you still have to shit in the morning.

We agree although I would state that the first thing to dissolve for me was the self. And I understand where you are coming from as well. See the Jim Newman video posted here. Hes awakened but the problem with it is others can take this on as a belief without directly dying. As he did. Same goes for you by the way. Listen to it.. Anyway - the God dreaming is important from a metaphysical and ontological standpoint. The understanding of reality is fundamental. So, while you claim enlightenment you do nothing to explain or set up a metaphysical framework from which to work. Enlightenment does not come without an understanding of reality as a whole. And here science must come into play. The typical neo-advatain however completely dismisses science. Did Einstein? Should you? I would beckon that you should not.

Yes I see that. And i have come to the conclusion that everyone has their own Truth. Do you not see how silly it would be for me to tell you that awakening was Absolute in the same thread where I am stating that I am alone as God? Its silly. I get it. I can tell you that for me it was the Truth. For you, you have yours. But..I will not stop teaching it. Because of stories like @Sincerity

I don't know then. Leo says a million hours of meditation wouldn't make up for him taking psychedelics to awaken. A lot of it comes down to genetics.

If you had multiple consciousnesses you would end up with sovereign entities each in their own reality. That's where the infinity of Gods video came in.

Maybe you haven't dissolved the self. A key part of meditation is self inquiry. There will be a moment when you realize that you - the self- is a thought. In that moment is enlightenment. So what type of meditation have you been doing? Did you incorporate self inquiry?

Yes. By waking up. You can literally wake up from this thing we call life. Now...will most people? No. But then again most people won't even sit down to do meditation. Actual meditation not using an app or some other crap. And even then it seems most people do not possess the proper genetics for awakening.

This is a pertinent question in your investigation. To assume she exists is just that. An assumption. Do not confuse the questioning of "other" with "self".

The only way both can be true is pertaining to the Inifnity of Gods video by Leo. Which does shed light. Other sovereign Gods can exist infinitely. But you are completely sovereign in your own right.

The knot to be tied is just that you are God. And it doesn't need to be tied its just that still you emanate that you arent the One. But if reality is infinity it makes you that by default. If reality is one.

We can but when it comes to this topic it is extremely vital. You care about responsibility as do I. And I was careless in the teachers I mentioned. But lets not be careless here.

The problem with this is starting with the dreamer. For there to be a dreamer that already sneaks in a hidden metaphysics. Self and other. So when discussing solipsism one must be extremely cautious. You start with the dreamer - as does Spira and others. But what if there is not a dreamer at all? What if the idea of a dreamer was first concocted by you. So that's the problem here. Its like the guy in the neo-advaitan video. Jim Newman...He is enlightened but try explaining that to anyone.

But you ignore blatant facts about the nature of reality. This is irresponsible of you to say the least.

He has a hard time being simple. He's very engrossed with being complex.

@Carl-Richard jf you are going to get deep into Ramana then you may want to clarify his stance on solipsism. Since you are the expert. Your abstract descriptions are vague at best.

I dont study Ramana but apparently you purposely bated me and set a trap. Thats fine. I dont study him but I do know solipsism. And it doesn't describe the dreamer. It is all encompassing.

The realization that there isnt a world that can reveal Solpsism to you. You have to reveal it to yourself. Thats what solipsism is, ultimately

He is trying to explain enlightenment and you can't.