Inliytened1

@Lyubov its going to be hard for the US to progress with an egotistical leader bent on things like crafting ships in his name. But the democratic party is no better just more subtle. At least Trump doesn't pull punches.

All you need is an open mind. A locked or closed mind cannot grasp that which is taught here and would not fully open themselves to meditation or retreats. Some people cannot be helped because they have already chosen not to be. But for the open enlightenment can dawn.

@strangelooper its your lack of intelligence that cannot see God's plan. Its all of our lack of intelligence. God is infinitely intelligent. Think about that and how far away from that you are. We have the intelligence of an ant compared to God.

You all know you tried to find the coolest name when you joined this forum This sounds really petty but can we list the top ten coolest names on the forum In your estimation? Maybe sometimes we should just get petty because it's fun and I know you have thought about it. List your top ten here. Leo Gura loses by default. I've got mine.

It's not terrible that's what being a man is.

Than its mystical. You cant have your cake and eat it too.

That's what it boils down to.

If guys can just figure this one thing out ..but no we have to try and control and be asses. Thats what leads to all the issues. The struggle for dominance. Yet if the guy just let the woman be dominant all of it can be avoided. .

Materialism fails at all angles. Drop it. You should be able to see how it fails as bright as you are. It frightens me that you cannot see it being how smart you are.

I cant describe it to you but it is a state. And if you ever do become omniscient you will know and understand all. Isn't that all that matters. In that moment what Josh or David had for breakfast doesn't mean anything

Good question but yet its still very silly. If I were omniscient I would also be able to tell you the particular matter of the star dust that fell on Mars today. I could tell you based on my microscopes the precise anatomy of the stardust. But this assumes all this Is happening outside of my direct experience. Can you confirm I am typing this in my chair right now in your direct experience. Most likely not. What I am saying is omniscience doesn't work like that because it doesn't need to. All of that which you think is occurring independent of you is truly imaginary. That's why, awakening involves the dissolution of not only self but other. Omniscience is more about a full understanding of reality and what you are. The details you specified dont matter because really they don't exist. Im not going to need to report every sneeze I make.

You say this yet you also claim a concrete process in which consciousness is derived from. That neurons create consciousness. Yet this concrete process you fail to decipher.

For this..does reality have to be objective? I don't think it does.. if it were, lets say, a dream, in which you were God dreaming it up..humor me here..then particles would be imaginary. Positions would be imaginary. Everything would be Mind. I think you touched on it yourself when you mentioned that when you cease to exist it all goes away. This tells me that you already intuit what I was saying. That reality is not objective but rather quite subjective although a subject is the wrong word too. Lets just say you're dreaming everything..

Nice of you to delve into these waters. Good to see you here and its about time. You can know reality fully and. completely. It's known as enlightenment. With enlightenment the human or the self drops. So you do become fully aware that you are God and fully omniscient. I don't think you comprehend the depths to which this goes. The entire dream ceases to be. This dream on which you can post and message me. All of it goes away. You do become reality.

@Ishanga the question is is consciousness made of atoms or is it just mystical.

Indeed.

Make it. You should finish series before moving to the next.

You're funny. But words such as"by relationship synchronized creating patterns over patterns of fluctuations that creates stable forms" does not equal consciousness. You will never, and nor will any scientist be able to explain the process..because it doesn't exist. Consciousness created the neurons. Once you understand this you can understand reality..but not before. You use words like infinity but it seems like you use them when convenient. A bunch of BS if you ask me.

When it comes to relationships we all know who's boss.

How is it created..Just magically? Really think this one through.

Well that's the whole discussion right? Is it something more than what can come out of materials. Like neurons. Do you think that? That it is just some random scientific process? And again it you do you should be able to explain how neurons make it happen.

Define Infinity. Because they are the same. So this is how ludicrous your claims are. Neurons in the brain create Infinity.

Saying it is or isn't something would limit it. It is Infinite. So stop doing that. It doesn't have to be an entity to feel or desire - it creates the appearance of an entity when rather it is the thing itself that feels and desires. Not an entity. An entity is an illusion. No stop assuming what I think. I asked you how chemicals in the brain make consciousness and you couldn't tell me. That tells me that consciousness isnt in the brain to begin with. Perhaps it is fundamental.

You did not. What is fhe mechanisms which neurons create consciousness. You cannot explain this because the process is obviously magical. Try thinking about it for yourself.

Saying reality can't desire implies limitation not the other way around. Desire doesn't imply limitation that is something you are sneaking in or projecting.