Inliytened1

@Leo Gura I am speaking from an enlightenment perspective only not teaching spirituality in general. .but I can only give my own experience. Your teachings had everything in order to bring out awakening combined with the tools i used. So that's why i say its enough. For that only. But you're right in the sense everyone's enlightenment and everyone's experience is going to be different. So for someone else perhaps it may be Ralston who opens the mind. I can tell you that your stuff had the substance and Ralstons may not. But everyone reacts differently to different teachers.

Well..you need that realization that it isn't real. You need the actual realization or insight. Not..it might not be real. More like..oh my God. Then there is a shift in concousness. Magically.

I think this feeds into his notions of meaninglessness. Might not be the best therapy. But i think he just rejects facing life. Face it as an adult or not. Just because he has the knowledge of Absolute Truth over all the ignorant millionaire or billionaire fools out there doesnt give him an exit card. It should give him the secret weapon...but this is the only life he will have so he might as well make the best of it.

Align with God. That is the purpose if there was one at all. I say that because God is ever beckoning you closer. Selflessness. Love. Alignment with your higher self. If there were a purpose it would be that.

It doesn't have to change the intended meaning it just has become foreign. At that point..its no longer authentic. Nowhere am I saying that @Nilsi doesn't have some good stuff to bring to the table. But if i can realize it wasn't him and someone else did too..then there is something wrong with that. Just..make your own posts..simple...

Exactly and that's what made you a better writer. @Michael Paul didn't mean to derail.

That's still their own words and their own thoughts- whether brainwashed or not..its still them when you are reading them. I would rather read a person caught up in dogma then read some robotic post from a machine.

This should be a clue to not spend touch time here and work on yourself. Just saying. We don't know you because we aren't you, and only you can fix it.

Well you have to be careful if you are using AI because it will sneak in other things as it rephrases. (Something like a pure grammar or spell checker won't) And then before you know it you have a completely different post. It's no longer authentic. I think that's the biggest reason it's against the guidelines to not announce that you used AI Again, if he is announcing it, it's s fine and is within guidelines. Obviously he is the one that came up with the whole thing. Just make sure you report that you use ChatGPT

😀 Straight to the Absolute. Using the tautology card no? Always works. It's like the wild card that can never fail

I have seen a dramatic improvement in the way you write. Props. Just something I noticed.

I'd rather him write without the use of assistance because AI will also try to rephrase. If he wants to only check grammar then use something like grammarly. Yeah that's AI based but you can use it purely for grammar checking. You don't need AI for a grammar checker of spell checker. @Breakingthewall for example started out really rough here since Enlgish isn't his first language and now look at him.

You have to report that you use AI its part of the guidelines. Otherwise you can receive a warning. Use your own words its a lot more effective.

Guess he took the MAGA hat off? I think he should change debt reduction to "grow my personal companies". It's just another republican party with a billionaire funding. Will never go anywhere....right?

Well..if it can lets see if the "America party" comes about...these guys are a hoot. Maybe Joe Rogan should run for Pres next time... I mean.. he is an idiot and he's got the popularity. That's what got Trump in right? Musk is such a power hungry goon. I don't think he even needs drugs to make his silly brain tick. He's just a freak out the gate.

In both cases you have to shut off a part of the mind to stop the suffering. You don't have to treat it directly. That's why through deep meditation you can release both types of suffering. Both physical and mental source from the ego. What mindfulness meditation aims to do is to shut off that part of the ego completely. If it's nullified there is no suffering. But then what is there, just raw Being. Think about this...on top of raw Being what we really are doing as egos is suffering. Like you said - for everyone there is a certain degree. But really it's all suffering. There are moments of pleasure but that's why people turn to drugs and alcohol. To stop the suffering. If the degree is low enough you can get by. But once it gets intense you have to find some mechanism.

Yeah I guess they are both anguish in their own way. Yet mental suffering would seem much more difficult to untangle because it is often not surface level. With surface level pain at least you are not in the hell of your own mind.

It can be transcended. I'm not saying i suffer from chronic pain but if you do that is a different type of suffering. It's not a psychological suffering or torment. A person can live with that. Psychological torment is far worse. Again I'm not saying I have to deal with chronic pain but in most cases that can be fixed. Mental suffering is something far more complex

Theres no such thing as physical suffering. There is pain and there is suffering. Two different things. Ask a guy with ALS if he's euffering...he'll tell you its not the outlook he wants to have on life.

@PurpleTree Money can't buy government. Someone needs to tell him this. He has a bigger head than Trump. If it's possible.

That's all this is., It's a rat race. But there is time to stop and smell the roses if you bother to use your brain. If you bothered to use your brain and try a little you wouldn't be homeless. The governement is not that messed up.

Get a room.

@Michael Paul in reading @Nilsi it.seems like he engaged AI.

Well..God is all of that and more. God is Perfection. Think about what that means. If you want to label God you cannot. If you want to say that all is God's will you would be correct. And if you want to say all of it isn't God's will you would also be correct. God must be paradoxical in this way because God is all things and more. And less. But you're right about Infinity. There must be existence although for something to truly be infinite it must also be able to not exist. Yet the thought of infinity exists so you have a paradox within infinity. Paradox must be embraced here. And the moral of this story is that existence is Infinity. And this is absolutely mind blowing because it has the capacity to literally create itself. To bootstrap itself. But why do you equate infinity to free will among humans? That's a big jump. Yes. God has nowhere to go..I guess that's the true trap he puts himself in..He's so almighty that he can't eacape.himself or erase his own existence. But in fact there is a way for that. Can God destroy itself? Yes. The paradox holds up and has a resolution because God can simply not exist by going unconscious. Into an Absolute void. Not a void of emptiness but of actual nothingness. I believe its called a cessation in spiritual circles. I have not experienced it and it cannot be fathomed. But it exists. Or doesn't exist. It doesn't exist. . So..is there anything else you want from Infinity? Or from God? I think God will be able to accommodate 😀

I guess you don't have a vision. There's one thing about Trump. He's crazy lucky. Somehow I feel the economy will end up ahead at the end of all this and we'll just have to reverse some of his dictator like policies. Fine. The question is - is there a Democrat that's going to step up and what are they going to do to improve the life for the average middle class American? The keep us out of wars part is clear...and the wall..well...I think they should build on not letting just anyone in. But what about the economy. What will they do to make things more affordable?