Extreme Z7

YEAH! His videos were so much deeper when he was talking about 'How To Have Amazing Sex'. @Leo Gura You should go back to talking about how to make girls cum.

THEY USED THE F WORD!!!

@Anna1 Thanks.

He did. A hurricane passed through the Philippines where I live on Christmas Eve. Had no power for 48 hours afterwards and had to spend part of it doing some Do Nothing Meditation to pass the time. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/26/asia/philippines-typhoon-phanfone-damage-intl-hnk/index.html

Classic Stage Blue Satire

I saw this video when it first came out. I just thought it'd be a good time to post it after @Leo Gura recently made a blog post about the Shapiro clip about Jon Lennon's 'Imagine'.

I did not say it was purposefully designed. The fact that it became that way naturally is not even a good thing. Also, that's a red herring. The specific way in which the system came to be is not what's relevant here I had a feeling you were going to say that. That's still sexist, though. You're engaging with the stereo-type of boys being dumb, low-brow neanderthals and girls being down-to-earth, pragmatic independent thinkers. The actual issue here is that the AAA game industry as a whole still appeals largely to a male audience so of course, most aspiring game devs who want to work in big game companies will be male.

@CreamCat It's not a matter of individual creative decisions. You're still in-denial about the industry's culture being systematically run by toxic masculinity values. Yikes, man. What you just said implies that women are inherently lazier than men.

@Leo Gura's official response

Your position is simply nonsensical. Everything can be explained. Pure randomness could not possibly create the universe we live in. And be careful with your rhetoric. From my experience, this forum isn't for people who don't think before they post.

@Nak Khid I was referring to "Worst Philosophy Ever" That's hardly the kind of title that sparks a reasonable debate. Not to mention, you haven't even elaborated on your position so we don't have anything to go off of when talking to you about it.

Try this: https://mynoise.net/NoiseMachines/clockTickTockNoiseGenerator.php

I'm predicting this thread will get locked pretty quickly. Not because of the topic itself but because of the way you presented your position. Also, clickbait title. This isn't just your regular forum.

His shirt did a Micheal Jackson.

Dammit. I was going to say that.

to my Father You never figured the guile of this world. But still served with absolute devotion to all you could. You were always stumped by the many things that your children became But did not fail to support or celebrate their success As a Husband, our Beloved Mother said there could be no better. Your innocuous Presence has been Impressive With Much Love, Sadhguru

<This comment has been removed by a moderator>

Lazy bum

Yes he does! Freedom of Speech: "I'll say whatever I damn want!" Family Values: That means Nepotism, right? Human Rights: He certainly loves people on the Right.

'This has gone is beyond parody'

Don't compare them to mosquitoes. These massive companies are even more blood-thirsty, disgusting, abhorrent creatures.

Low Quality Art has its places, sure. But it doesn't have a place on literally every platform available. Certainly not Steam if Steam would actually exercise some damn quality control.

Stumbled upon this video series advocating for complete abolishment of copyright law. It's very Stage Green because it goes full-on relativistic. While it did open my mind to severely weakening copyright law as it is today, I feel that it did not give a good enough argument to COMPLETELY ABOLISH it. Be sure to check out the videos first, I give a short response below. My response: I agree that copyright law should be severely weakened but completely abolishing copyright law would make it perfectly legal to steal someone else's work and sell it as your own without changing anything about it or mentioning the original artist. I'm not even talking about sampling here, I'm saying I could literally take any one of your albums and sell them as if they were my own. Also, it would allow hack artists with a severe lack of creative vision to run amok and create extremely low quality derivative works that steals works and ideas from other artists. You might think that it still counts as freedom of speech but pragmatically speaking, that would be a huge problem to artists who actually care about creating highly original visionary works. It's hard to tell where we should draw the line but refusing to draw a line at all would be devastating.