Aaron p

Member
  • Content count

    2,917
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Aaron p

  1. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Elizabeth Warren Pete Buttigieg Pramila Jayapal Tammy Baldwin Katie Porter Gavin Newsom Cory Booker Ilhan Omar Sarah McBride Julie Johnson Mark Takano Sharice Davids Ritchie Torres Angie Craig Becca Balint Robert Garcia Eric Sorensen Mark Pocan Hakeem Jeffries Katherine Clark Pete Aguilar Ayanna Pressley Rob Bonta JB Pritzker Kelly Cassidy Jamie Eldridge Kyle Davis Jessica Benham Leigh Finke Elisa Cresp Roberta Achtenberg Josh Gottheimer Carolyn Maloney Gwen Moore Fortney "Pete" Stark ...just googled it. Once again, they're vocal support of LGBTQ+ policies are right but it's just recognising where it becomes too emotionally fueled and subjective and world ending. It's stimulating the right and provoking trumpism.
  2. This. (Also it doesn't undermine the validity subjects related and similar to the LGBTQ+ movement, it's just stopping making it out to be a world ending subject of unimaginable importance). The left needs to stop weaponising sex and gender. The right is getting pissed off and voting for Donald trump's. This is something I like to call: truth.
  3. (I'd like to start just by immediately disclosing that I support LGBTQ+ rights and I'm left on the political compass. Also I'm open to correction/ disagreement. Also I don't actually support Donald trump I'm just looking at these specific legislative movements). Trump's admin has ordered a piece of legislation that holds that there are only 2 genders, and significantly limited support of sex transition surgical procedures for children... Although the stance that only two genders exist doesn't contradict transgender rights...it just says that you can be one or the others and if you want life changing surgery you need to wait until your above the age of 18. Does anyone have opinions on whether these are reasonable/logical legislative movements?.. Additional edit: Even considering the general extreme lengths progressivism is now going to, to affirm every whim and fleeting random idea young people have about their gender identity with nearly all forms of investigation or thoughtful questioning as hatefulness or some form of opression or attack... I mean...it kinda feels like society has gone off the deep end with a lot of extreme liberal subjectivism and "whatever you feel like is what is good and holy." I feel that this may also be feeding into the whole new age extreme sensitivity around consent and if you kiss someone at the wrong time or make a habit of complimenting females too much or advance too fast in a sexual encounter you can say goodbye to your life. Modern progressivism often emphasizes emotional affirmation, especially for youth. While this can be compassionate, it sometimes goes too far — treating subjective feelings as unquestionable truth, particularly around gender identity. This can lead to: Quick medicalization without deep exploration. Social pressure to adopt non-traditional identities. Suppressed dialogue, where questioning is seen as hateful. An overreliance on emotions, potentially undermining resilience and long-term well-being. When taken to extremes, it risks doing more harm than good — especially to the very youth it aims to protect. Balance, thoughtful discussion, and careful support are essential. --- I'm also reminded of Leo's videos entitled "Making sense of Jordan Peterson" and "When does the left go too far." Where Leo delivers his conclusions (which I am mostly in agreement with) that certain political figures like Peterson are naturally, energetically put in place to stabilise society and to remind people of the basic logical foundations of their existence. I can't remember what was said in the Peterson episode (and I hope I'm not misquoting) but I think this was the general idea...
  4. @Ishanga do you think it would be fair to say that it's possible that some of Donald trump's logistical movements can be justified in certain ways but that perhaps a large percentage of Americans hate him for reasons relating more so to his character, persona and general behaviour? I mean just looking at the man, I can tell that his mind just goes on loops. To me it's kind of obvious that his character is not a good example and that a lot of racists and homophobes are going to vote for him. I think character matters a lot. At the same time it's extremely refreshing to see political correctness getting shut down. Teaching young people that it's okay to be offended at 99% existence and that they deserve to have anyone who disagrees with them to be destroyed is really instilling incorrect ideas. However, I also recognize that humanity at large is filled with a large amount of dumb, dumb individuals and that this is included in government and that even if the left is doing certain things wrong (which is obvious and which any political side will do) it's better to try and gain an overarching, big picture view on the direction of the overall beast. I love playing with the idea of moving to a country like Portugal where their laws are much more intelligent and compassionate and conscious. They are heavily left leaning now and their spiritually inclined as well 💭
  5. In warfare and instances of societal conflict it's observed that if one political side starts to advance too quickly or become too loose...it can provoke a resistance and insurrection. Central issues like gender issues and limitless people getting "offended" at something someone does or says or because they looked in a certain direction...this is what has provoked a lot of idiots on the right to support extremist far right political figures like the donald. Political correctness, offense, gender identity...when these things go too far or become too unquestioned, people like trump show up. What's difficult as well is the fact that many leftists will refuse to hear this and react and recoil even more and get 100x more offended and try report on trump more in the media and destroy him...but it is this very resistance that will strengthen and prolong his control. Trump must be removed by intelligence and consciousness, not resorting to emotional chaos and calling all of the right predators. What I can see of the American people is that they see these attacks as all the more reason to form an uprising against what they see as corruption..
  6. Yeah word, you can do a meditative contemplation session instead. Orrr you could look at different meditation techniques like "do nothing" (where you don't "try" to quiet your mind, you just allow everything and absorb every thought and idea without getting too warped into them and just keep the body still). Generally just remember that it's best to trust the guru to do the practise for you
  7. Yeah it's gotta be obvious at this point but it's equally, this is only one part of trump's entire show. Yeah I know it's manipulating society. Once again these specific observations are the exception. Bro I get it, trump is bad. But there's little space on this site for a lack of emotional control, nevermind projections. Your statements appear to lack maturity
  8. Nice report. Yeah I'm aware that I'm just playing games atm, but I know I'll get back there. I think it's kinda also alright to enjoy the game for a bit
  9. Seeing as Leo has recently made a more explicit differentiation between enlightened and God realized and if I assume you mean somebody who has attained a permanent recognition of God in every day waking existence... I would estimate out of the 8,217,449,282 people that currently exist, about 100 absolute max. Maybe I'm off but this is my estimate. I sense that I could maybe be wrong here and that the number is maybe more around 1000. But I sent its definitely under a thousand... I mean considering how much work it takes to become deeply awakened and permanently so it requires very special breed of person
  10. 🤔I think I've got an idea for his next evolution: Hip hop stage of actualized evolution
  11. So I was raised Christian and eventually got involved with Christian mysticism (the Christian part has heaps of bs in it so beware). Anyway, one of the very very rare things that Christianity gets kinda right is the love and the person of God. Moreso in protestant Christianity the idea of relationship over religion is quite common which is amazing because it's true. Of course then even this idea becomes religious but it's a step in the right direction. A loving, alive, invigorating relationship with a personal God. It's been the backbone of my entire life. Developing the skill of hearing god is something tuned with much much effort and it's often still very hazy and hard to distinguish between the voice of the holy ghost/higher self/spiritual god-self and the regular deceptive voice of the ego mind. But I've developed the skill to recognising the voice suuuuuuuuper super clear sometimes. Like I had the clearest word from god I ever had about 3 weeks ago where he spoke the word bartaman to me. Looked it up and it means present in sansrik...then I interpreted it through my process and essentially determined that god was saying he was present in my situation and he was essentially fighting for me...causing the figurative winds to blow heavily in my favour as reward for trusting him. So yeah I mean yeah...that's what I call the holy ghost. Holy just means pure and ghost means something that's not physical (i.e. something spiritual in ontological status). But please be aware that there is so much scam shit and people who think they hear jesus when really they're just imagining it. It could and probably is the voice of god flowing through them a little bit...but it's probably like 0.05% god and 99.95% imaginative additional shit made up by the ego mind. If your trying to hear god don't be attached too much to terms like Jesus and holy ghost, recognise that these are only individual terms of many many other interchangable terms that identify the same thing. Call it the spirit of Allah if you want too...just to remind yourself not to get locked into one paradigm. And go by peace not thoughts that enter your head...these can easily be manipulated by ego but peace is harder to alter
  12. @sda ah nice. Oh shit yeah I need to read the other messages. Good good.
  13. I find the "do not..." Mantras to be way more natural and subsequently powerful than positive mantras. So rather than trying to instill new ideas accurate, we undermine inaccurate ideas. Some examples mantras: - "Do not trust the mind." x250 - "Do not believe in materialism." x100 - "Do not believe in death." x100 - "Do not be led by egotism or ignorance." x100
  14. @sda if* what your saying is true and accurate...call the non emergency police line and tell them. This depends on where you live (you also want to be careful because of you make a move and it doesn't work and they find out, they'll bully and control you wayyyy more and it'll get way worse). So come up with a plan and just make sure to do it right. Hard and fast. You'll be doing your society a favour by notifying the local authorities. In a lot of countries there are laws against coercive control and manipulation. Call the cops (tell them you don't want them to find out and that they need to be delicate when handling your situation) tell them full detail about your abusers.
  15. Yeah but this existence is pretty cool. I like the colours that's one of my favourite things
  16. We'll miss you frank
  17. I was thinking a possibly good term to identify people who are skilled deliverers of streamlined truth in a powerful, simple, and hard hitting way...could be: map finders, map upgraders, alterers of structure, finders of structure, accurate structure mappers...or perhaps: Anti-bullshit structure illuminators
  18. Humans are apes throwing shit at a wall competing with eachother to see who can throw their shit the highest. Even the philosophers and artists are just apes who've discovered they can mould their shit into a statue of Jesus
  19. Whoa. Research time @Leo Gura ...I hear people speak and they are strong in their ability to deliver truth in an elegant, simple way even if it is in direct contradiction to mainstream ideas (like the idea of all far lefts being anti-fascist)...these diamonds in the dirt I find every now and again are incredibly powerful, often because of how simple they are. Just so stripped of unnecessary BS. It's like chess. Often the most advanced chess players are only thinking with the most extreme forms of basic logic and simple thought patterns. Is there a broad umbrella term that exists to identify people who speak with such simplicity, accuracy and directness (and subsequently power)? You know, people like us on this site. Ideally the term couldn't be "truth-teller" or "sage" as everyone claims to be a truth teller and sages are often way off in some abstract philosophical realm. I was thinking calling them "people of profound insight"? It would just be good if we had a term for this kind of truth seeker kind of like how "Nonduality" is the term for the core of our philosophical stance...?