-
Content count
3,279 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Jack River
-
Haha! It does all by its self
-
Intelligence sees the danger as danger and responds accordingly dude?
-
@Preetom thought will play some tricks heh
-
What you say comes as a result of seeing through that divison which is action in its end.
-
If we are talking to somebody who has not yet understood the self/thought they will most definitely get caught in such a trap as disidentification but identification with what they have accumulated via knowledge. I understand what you mean, although I think that can easily set up years of divison/conflict. That’s how I see it thought my dude.
-
You don’t see the trap in identifying as “the watcher” dude?
-
Your the bomb sister! I am your dude fo life?
-
Be careful with identifying period. Identification is a movement of divided action. People seem to disidentify with thought/emotion/reaction which also leads to further divison between the experiencer and the experience, thinker and the thought. The supposed divison between “me” and “my” thoughts/emotions/reactions are what causes conflict/suffering. It takes two to conflict. So it’s important that we don’t subtly reinforce another divison without noticing so. Thought can be extremely tricky and sneaky as @robdl has mentioned.
-
The problem seems to lie in the lack of relationship with ourselves, which is expressed in relationship with others/environment. It all starts with I(me).
-
Divided action as such will not act instantly and totally. It’s inherenet structure feeds off its tendency of coming to an action ‘gradually’ over time/accumulation/cultivation. This puts action further away in time. Really a resistance to act totally/wholly NOW. This insight blew my freakin mind not apart, but together. Made whole.
-
It’s pretty gnarly..The divided action of self/thought to control(progressively change fear with time/cultivation/effort) actually feeds that movement of fear/divison.
-
FEAR=TIME (the continuity of self).
-
You get what I’m getting at my dudet? when you see the danger in psychological fear, do you think “oh I should end that, how can I end it”, or do you simply end it? From the notion of being a self we tend to think about how do I get rid of this fear. Which is what breeds that fear. So intelligent action sees the danger and end it right then. It doesn’t ask how do I, what should I do..it acts wholly.
-
The fear you refered to being dangerous is the fear of thought psychologically, right? That means there is a incoherence operating in thought. A supposed divison between the experiencer and the experience, which creates a confused response of action or non action. As is suggesting in the tread tittle. Psychological Fear is the result of the supposed divison. Attachment/resistance/identification. Intelligence sees this and ends it instantly/totally.
-
No because they haven’t biologically evolved quite yet.
-
Your not gettting my point about the intelligence response I made to you? To me fear is more of a “me” coming to an end. As in psychological ending. And when the body acts completely/totlay without thought/self thinking about it that is an action of intelligence(the organism protecting itself). Fear/action seems more psychological intelligence seems more biological but intelligence actually seems to be a harmony between the emotions/intellect. When the intellect takes over we get the psychological fear which seems to confuse/conflict total action.
-
Hey I have had that happen with my nephew as well dude. Scary. The same as a little cub/lion out in safari...needs protection from its papa/mama as it hasn’t reached a certain age yet.
-
Tell me, when a bus is speeding your way do you act and move out of danger, or think about acting?
-
Fosho dude.. you called it fear..I call it intelligent action to step out of the way of a speeding bus
-
I’m not sure what Leo refers too. I’m kind of a solo/self obsever. The intelligence I refer to is whole. Undivided action. Not a two step process (movement of thought/then action). Intelligence acts instantaneously where as divided action/intellect-action implies a conditioned movement of thought then action. When a bus is coming to destroy this body or or I walk up on a venomous snake do I sit there and think about it, or do I move away from the danger?
-
What do you mean?
-
Hehe develop what?
-
Jack River replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
The implicitations of this are most excellent and totally necessary dudes. -
Jack River replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
? what would you say is the greatest responsibility after freedom/liberation? To embody truth right...which means can I live a day to day life free of the image of myself which gets projected in relationship onto others. Do you realize the energy it takes to do this? -
Fosho dude! Fear and pleasure go very much together. To understand fear we have to understand pleasure and vice versa. Fear lies behind every movement away from what-is and towards what should be (movement of psychological becoming). Fear is the breeding ground for resistance/attachment/identification(the search for security/permanence in that which is impermanent(time).
