Etherial Cat

You're writing this post like something is wrong with me.

Is it really pertinent to write back a comment relying on such minutiae, knowing there are plenty of individuals (including me) writing in english as a second language? You should get the gist of what I mean, as it isn't rocket science. Game (as described by Leo) comes off to me as manipulative. And it is used primarily to get into woman's pants (isn't the video named "How to get laid"?).

I've issued 2 complains for seeing this type of post written by one of your mods. While the posts themselves are obviously more cringy and stupid than anything else, I'm still wondering why no one has been blushing at that situation? And why is this person still worthy of assessing whether a person deserves warnings or points taken after being caught writing such backwards bs?

I do agree with this. Actually, the day Leo released his video on "How to get laid", I thought about leaving the forum. While the video itself was better than I expected, it still feels at the bottom like Leo is encouraging his followers to deceive women for the purpose of using them as handkerchief, regardless of feminine welfare. I'm also not surprised to see many posts coming from a place of hurt and a feeling of betrayal, written by women since then. This seems to be the natural consequence coming from deciding to make of Game a golden standard.

Yeah. You can't keep on investing a lot of energy when he's putting some minimal effort. Things needs to be rather even, otherwise he'll just assume you're his toy. But It's already cool you guys met. That was all brave of you, to make this happen. I'd just wait for him to initiate, now.

Ohhhh then, never mind the comment I made. I assumed he was in a relationship due to what you said above. ^ Then, the space is cleared. Wonderful! Well, then... I'd still wait for him to make a move, now. This guy doesn't sound like an helpless innocent dove when it comes to girls. If he's interested enough he should write you, seriously. No excuses!

@somegirl He's got a long time girlfriend. That's mostly your issue there. What is he going to do with the two of you?

That guy is still a mod?

Curing the average guy of his fear of intimacy feels more desperate than teaching mules algebra. But you might be into something.

I do. ?Bitter man! Useless if your saliva is dripping out of your mouth and you assign a shit ton of value to the said look. The energy is still there.

It's almost like it is as difficult as flipping your mind. Only you can do that, of course. But the leading part is what I've been disagreeing with.

You blind, bruh . It's obviously the contrary. The average men treat intimacy like cats afraid of water. Nor emotions, vulnerability or even trusting females are a masculine forte.

No. I do reply. Of course, objective factors are always noticed, but my point is that quality attraction revolves around BOTH objective and subjective factors. When 1/2 is filed, I don't blink much. Whether it's for me or for them. That's only true if we meet in social settings where my looks is primarily what will be noticed, which are environments I try to avoid. Also, guys don't have to always start conversations or social interaction with women on the basis of their look or attraction level, you know. If you have guy friends (I'm assuming your not attracted to them), you could totally also conceive how men can engage in all kind of relationships with women without sexual intent being the primary cause as a start. Approach in the sense of Game is not the only way to meet people. I would even say, most interaction start through randomness, and not cold approach.

Most guys approaching me through a cold approach or in a club will not get my number because there will be likely zero resonance between us. Obviously, what drives his choice at this point is just the body, and I'm only interested in people holistically willing to consider me. By not giving it away, I'm saving time for him and for myself. Though, I give my number very easily each time other factors get involved. So, I follow up gladly, except if it crosses the line and shows an excessive sexual intent. This is a good sign of being actually fuck zoned and I don't like that.

@Leo Gura Which is why most girls are obviously just good enough for a low investment good lay in a club.

@Vzdoh It's resonance, compatibility, maturity and timing that will make him commit to you.

As we say "Ubi societas, ibi ius. Ergo: ubi homo, ibi ius". This means that where the human being is, there is a society. And where there is a society, there is law. We need rules to live together, and always have. If the law is not codified like it is today, it is existing as per custom and general principles known by everyone, which is transmitted orally or by examples and socially enforced via standards. That it is still a form of law. I also don't see humanity ever reaching a point where we'd all live through love and truth. It seems to me like all humans are designed to go through ego development stages before arriving at this point, which give per default enough room for a set of wrongful behavior. So at least until maturation, there would still be a good portion of people in development (if only children, teenagers and young adults) potentially doing some mischiefs. But it seems clear that in advanced societies there is much less crimes and felonies of all kind. These come from imprinting on society with violent patterns, scarcity and high anomie. I would estimate that in a very very advanced society most major infractions would be rare.

Not really. That was for the lolz. These songs are like the ultimate cliché. Perhaps the type of thing that are so bad it gets good.

So the fact he's married, and post video like this isn't enough to presume he's no longer into womanizing in your opinion? What you seem to miss is that assuming this is not enough proof is also based on an assumption you're making about his character. -- Treating well ≠ niceness. Women are definitely attracted to men who treat them well. There is nothing to say there. If you disagree with the statement above, it means you believe women are attracted to men who treat them poorly and that's absolutely false. Niceness on the other hand means an excessive, spineless behavior. So the two concepts aren't describing the same reality. Women are attracted to men who are both respectful of themselves and others. A man who is falling in the niceness spectrum lacks spine and often has poor boundaries. Which is why it looks unattractive.

So perhaps next time directly address the answer given to the question, instead of quoting the question like it was never answered. To give some context, I've been talking about Russel as per his current version. As I said earlier, he is married and has settled down. There are plethora of videos on his channel where you can see Russel's character and his view on sexuality. Therefore, assuming he treats woman right is far from being outlandish. For someone who is so adamant I'm assuming things... I'll have to ask you where you're pulling that presumption from? Where did I state that women are attracted to niceness? It seems to me that you've got an inaccurate representation about the way I think.

@Harlen Kelly I already told you I'm not triggered. ?

@Derek White What about you read the thread further and read the reply given a few post after?

@Harlen Kelly No. Incorrect mood reading ?. Maybe some weariness. I'm so fed up at reading PUA creates out of the world studs, when it doesn't. ?

@Harlen Kelly Vagina dry. But my eyes are bleeding.