Aakash

@zeroISinfinity Yup great advice i will go and do this We all need as much meditation as we can get to destroy our ego

@zeroISinfinity

@zeroISinfinity lol i don't call myself the prince of hell for nothing , you know so you finally got it! yes you need to become your insights otherwise it's just a belief

@zeroISinfinity yup lol there is only existence and that includes everything around you

@Shin thanks for the video its interesting, i can see myself as both the bears simultaneously

@Shin @DrewNows Literally bro, the survival of our whole species depends on you answering this question LOL

the morality compass doesn't change for the absolute. Instead of the morality compass tailored to "i" , it is tailored to "consciousness" itself therefore its a transcended version of morality. The morality stays exactly the same, but it is done on behalf of serving consciousness for example, if it is necessary to kill off the whole predators of bee's, so we can survive as a species. This would benefit consciousness most. This is simple food-chain/ pollination science. then as an enlightened being or community. We should do that the question will always arise, on who's authority is that okay? before on behalf of the individual is relative, on behalf of the whole of consciousness it is still relative however, it is a conscious decision Therefore i would get a chainsaw and saw the predators of the bee's. This is the meaning of unconditional love The ideology that enlightened beings are "all good" is nothing but a projection However, it is understood in the wrong way. Both the "all good" and the "all bad" will be relative and not absolute Thus solving the whole problem of morality. if it was best for consciousness, that humans die. Then we kill ourselves without questioning it. why you might ask? because its infinite free will, either we do it ourselves or we continue to survive as a species, until we become more conscious Which is exactly the century we are in, with the development of stage green, and efficient distribution of resources. if we don't do it ourselves, the decision will be made for us and we'll end up going extinct ourselves from depleting all the planets resources to survive, thus needing to fly to mars to colonise other resources Because consciousness is absolutely good. it won't kill us for wanting to survive. We will just get killed off by some other more advanced species eventually. because consciousness is infinite and is expanding constantly So power plays a very important part for survival. If we didn't have nuclear arms, we wouldn't be able to survive extra-terrestrial threats. We will be seen as food to them for their survival , just like we saw the predators of bees a necessary sacrifice for our survival. if, in that time we had learned to become more consciousness, maybe we could have communicated with the aliens telepathically in this way absolute infinity is infinitely fair and unbiased to any species , and because its infinitely fair, its infinitely good because only the most conscious will survive and create more consciousness. Therefore increasing infinite consciousness

@DrewNows lets flip it around why should i not show you? you clearly have a viewpoint on why i must not show you and not a viewpoint on why i should so you go first

@DrewNows Yes i am fooling the exact same thing that fools both of us LOL. assumptions IQ level : 10 watch look i'll show you LOL is cancer good or bad?

The absolute erases your bad morality , simply put at higher levels of consciousness. You become selfless its just a personal taste after that how you go about doing it When absolute infinity is absolutely infinite. Its impossible to suggest that any enlightened being should act in any specific way. Sure if they give up their ego.. their morality will raise even higher, than someone who doesn't However, their value as an "enlightened" being only ever works if they are capable of "enlightening" a person with their wisdom if they aren't enlightening somebody, then by definition their title of being an enlightened being is renounced by default of being totally nothing (without ego) So hypothetically, its as logical as this. an enlightened being who is less moral hypothetically, if he is enlightening someone, then he is being a better enlightened being So his immorality goes full circle and becomes morality. whilst the enlightened beings morality goes full circle and becomes immoral. This is why being enlightened is a 24 hour job. your there to serve the larger whole So realistically people would rather enjoy having a highly moral person feed them information, than a highly immoral person. The information is judged to be valid based on the personality type. As you would expect because humans are skeptical. if you look / say the part. People will think you are being authentically loving. so its simply the case that its impractical as the absolute to be immoral, because you want to help people on your own accord. it takes a truly enlightened person to consider everything fair game and the benefits of being immoral. Still its simply the case, that its impractical to act in such a way when you have followers or there are followers because they are still trying to get around. So yeah its like all cases, just how you look at it. its different for leader, than it is his followers which should also be taken into account. If you have a leader, they need to maintain morality. However, the morality shifts as its completely relative throughout the party. and if your talking about a non -enlightened being. its simple the devil has no bad morals which have good intentions for anyone besides themself as well as their good morals are also selfish. So the moral compass absolutely changes when you hit an absolute level, it gets recontextualise 360 because the questions don't become should i do this or should i do that. Its embedded into your system that you won't ever hurt people for your own pleasure or for their suffering without reason. i should probably just write in my opinion that is, everyone is free to their own opinion.

@Natasha No no no you misunderstand. I don't mean war man! i mean conscious warfare! nevermind i'll become humble for everyone , it's like i said... its the only form of love where people think is genuine anyway LOL @DrewNows Yes bro thank you. conscious warefare is after all good on yourself but bad on yourself . still i'll swallow a chill pill. Relax inside of consciousness. Become a do-nothing sage for a while

@SerpaeTetra Lol now i understand conrad I AM GOD blah blah blah quite funny actually. Yes thank you for your warning. but caring is subjective at best. to me personally starting war is more caring, then tending to wounds. i acknowledge what your saying, but i only go to the peak of my capabilities. To come back down as the most stupidest person on earth such a tactic is needed to elevate people with care.

@pluto LOL dude i officially given up. I've done all six of the things i've come to do - start a revolution - find the true nature - stared god in the face - reach enlightenment - see what nirvana is like - tell people i'm the smartest person in the world I just came to know the truth LOL, now i get it conceptually (memory based enlightenment) its all good

@pluto dude i'm still as jelly right now. it doesn't matter what i choose to believe in. Its still LOL There is nothing i am clinging onto and nothing i am gaining i could suffer and i could not LOL it would be alright i literally mean there is no definitive answer to any state of being ego/ego less it is merely free will and choice to create your own reality as i see it currently what do you think of what i've said like there is no ego suffering from an illusion of a self to which it needs to know about enlightenment which is the present moment as consciousness thats like four relative statements and at the same time it is true but there is no distinction i can choose to choose between one or the other. They are equal LOL

as a conceptually enlightened person... my heart yearns to go back to omniscient consciousness more than it does nirvana. there's just something homely about it Still i can't deny that under my current direct experience it sounds ludicrous and hella delusional. like super delusional.

Yes it is true what you say here, still it is not an awakening i can easily dismiss. There i was god himself still one could possibly argue, this was only a version of true stillness. in this case LEO would be incorrect, i see this now Even assuming wintersoliders video, he would be correct as well Interesting. My personal decision based on my experience and understanding is, omniscency is more truer than this Because the strange loop wraps around you as god. but i'm happy to accept neither non-dual enlightenment nor omniscienct enlightenment , i'm quite pleased by my conceptual enlightenment.

@cetus56 Yeah this is it, it doesn't matter what question you ask, it loops back around to consciousness being the answer to its own question about itself. in the end, to say "i" experienced it was still consciousness itself, so that would just loop around back here aswell LOL still this place is pretty chilling LOL .. don't have to use my mind. but i'm in agreeance with this, this is exactly the end point of that that made it so special. The thought of a question would be ridiculous because you've answered all exestential questions. The difference is , the difference between having reality around you and being reality itself i think. i can also see why E-beings rejected leo's offer. This place is pretty chilled and you can switch between any logical system you want to, without confusion but boyyyyy that was atleast... 10000-20000 x better than this LOL

@pluto Lol creation is indeed complicated, my friend. That's why its able to be the way it is. may i presume you haven't had an omniscient awakening?

@cetus56 Yeah but it flips between all of them constantly, like your still cetus with your knowledge etc, and everyone is me, but we are all separate as well. The reason is because it can be which ever perspective you take. what i'm basically saying is there is no definitive answer to the question. But ultimately yes, i am talking to myself. lol but this does not mean that the ultimate perspective is correct its literally all possibilities i thought that's what we agreed nirvana is "the groundless ground" I'm not sure what do you think what i mean is , in omnisciency i felt like i was alone, here its like i can choose freely lol

@Inliytened1 indeed as i have said many times in past conversations that reality is absolutely relative. And the Absolute is both the Absolute and the relative and the Absolute. Oneness makes it indistinguishable. Yes that is true, so what do you think about my spiral coral comments, they are still viable. The thing is we've both experienced an omniscient consciousness, i don't see any contradictions, with this nirvana and omniscient consciousness. in fact, i would even go as far as to say that, it is more godly than this. This is something i felt whilst inside omniscient state, but this omniscient state was like .... The end of understanding + nirvana or anakantada = YOU AS GOD I can't explain it, but when i was in omniscient--- I was inside of god as god this nirvana = ALL IS GOD with this, it feels like i am god but not the god at the same time what does your experience tell you?

@Inliytened1 so does this mean you are in agreeance and this is what you experience lol

Sorry i had to type it up from one of leo's videos This is what is in my direct experience and has lead me to no mind. The collapse of all qualities by seeing every "thing" is anakantavada Anakantavada All the following seven predicates must be accepted as true for a cooking pot 1) From a certain point of view, the pot exists 2) From a certain point of view, the pot does not exist 3) From a certain point of view, the pot exists and does not exist 4) From a certain point of view, the pot is inexpressible 5) From a certain point of view, the pot both exists and is inexpressible 6) From a certain point of view, the pot both does not exist and is inexpressible 7) From a certain point of view, the pot exists, does not exist and is also inexpressible So overall you get no-thing-ness by not being able to distinguish anything with the mind, (no mind) We are all in agreeance yes?

@cetus56 @Inliytened1 @winterknight wait give me 10 minutes, i'm not expressing myself correctly, i would like to do it accurately with love. So wait! i need to find a picture to express what i really mean.

@winterknight Shit happens bro, my whole devilish side got destroyed by consciousness my whole mind got destroyed aswell , it can not locate consciousness plus, yeah man. I never expected to become enlightened basically in the last 2 hours LOL i recontextualised my understanding of things and realised what you said was right but i was confused about your understanding until you said to the seeker it is an illusion. Which means you understand that there is no such thing as illusion or real, You are in the mid point of duality. The collapse of all duality. it is neither. but i apologise, i never knew the extent to a complete enlightened state, i also couldn't scale the difference between other beings claimed to be enlightened, the way they talked and why they were so different to the way you talked. Also your presence was very different. so yeah, its my bad for not being able to scale you into my model. @Inliytened1 i come in peace, there will be no more war for now LOL. i promise

@Serotoninluv @Nahm I can't make distinctions anymore. everything has become the same I can have no choice but to say, "this is the highest thing i know" it is the absence of mind exactly as i thought it would happen the mind surrenders itself, because it can no longer make any distinctions. So what is it's purpose. Nothing. Survival. This is the meta-mind, not the brain mind. its basically lol, the end of reality because you can't even describe it as reality basically the nature of things is that its nature is its very dangerous to mistake consciousness for an illusion, but its the same to take it completely as real because it is neither. the whole point of duality is to say 1) one is true , the other is false 2) one is false, the other is true 3) both are true 4) both are true and neither true at the same time 5) both are neither false nor true i forgot the rest, but that jain thing, is how to work through duality step by step to collapse it lol