-
Content count
4,210 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Aakash
-
@tedens 1) they either don't know about it 2) they are seeking too much 3) they are lost in concept land 4) its difficult to seek the very thing that you already are 5) its so blindingly obvious that its too easy to reject the idea there are very few people who attain the realisation, and when they do its so stupid and laughable that there's no point of saying it to people. only if you still have ideal concepts about what enlightenment is that you go and tell other people, look there's this amazing thing it helps with a,b,c. these are fake gurus in my opinion. then you get the genuine ones who help spread the word, only through their teachings, they never actually say to people you should hunt enlightenement. you can't tell people something they already are, or they will just laugh and say i know, when they don't really understand what your trying to describe. for example, the sentence are you aware? can make you enlightened. its just doesn't transfer the essence of the word i hold and change what the essence of the word you hold too and this is the same for the world enlightenment. most people think enlightenment was a period of time from the 1800's to 1950's where scientific revolutions were in booming constant, this involves light, engines (i think) etc.. it was the time for science. for some people its too direct of a solution if i told you enlightenment would end your suffering and then i said meditate, most people wouldn't actually do it unless they are suffering.
-
Aakash replied to Preetom's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
inqeuality is a misconception its assuming that first there was a chance of things being equally distributed to everyone secondly, that all invididuals will distribute their possessions to everyone without a need for leveraging anything against it. even if you equally distribute everything out, eventually it will still run out and the whole system will crash again and go back to how it is now so the question is the best way to distribute the resouces and currently that is by accumulating most of it for yourselves to survive. i see only two options transcend the whole model or remain within the model itself, transcending being everything is fine , regardless of the situation. This is the exact reason british economy has decided to grow at 2% a year because there is no way it can keep up with demands of the changing environment where they want control of all aspects and be equal at the same time, and has lead to the right staying in power for the majority of term. therefore equality nor our current system will never sustain the world and we are slowly reaching the end of democracy, and so inequality will never be solved. equality is not the solution either. but it is a higher conscious one. -
@John Lula its called freedom in a way, reality doesn't need to be any other way and therefore it allows itself to be what ever it wants to be without exception. so yes your thoughts become your own self-deluded reality and that includes your beliefs as you mentioned. as for a soul, its better to just think that there is one supreme spirit/ soul which is the same in all of us. This is ofcourse a concept to describe the actual thing in reality but its a more truthful concept lets say. just don't believe it wholeheartedly and find out for yourself
-
@Peo No, the DNA sequence is itself an illusion. it might seem like it correlates to a change in protein structure for example and that might possibly relate to a certain type of disease, enlightenment is the totality of this whole event, its like saying to look at DNA is to investigate the yolk of an egg and enlightenment is the whole egg itself. PS i understand i'm not speaking from a materialistic paradigm, so saying it is an illusion isn't going to help you. so to explain by maybe saying DNA and enlightenment are not connected, both are different concepts. SORRY i'm not adept to really answers questions in the correct format. but i hope i managed to help in some way.
-
Aakash replied to winterknight's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@winterknight dude if this is the case, then i'm literally chasing my own tail and this whole enligthenment thing is literally a concept and BS. BS. BS. the whole thing! FFS even everything about enlightened masters to literally every concept in this world. all i know is that whatever that is, you know what i'm talking about, that is all there is. but when all these masters and everything talk about ohh the natural state of enlightenement being, love or being what ever BS i'm finding it to be now. Is THIS all BS aswell? i am in agreeance that the only thing is silence and that looker/knower/awareness is all that exsist and has, so i'm not sure where these people got to the fact that they are love and show it. thats what i'm struggling with and trying to copy now because i thought it was the right thing to do. -
As for why people get enlightened faster than others, i would say that each of us who believe we are a soul carry with us our own baggage of illusions and self delusions which we exhibited to get ourselves to this very point in time and this current understanding irrespective of what we know/ believe. remember we are each a self-delusion ourselves, and yes in respect to a time orientated timeline, we have gathered karmic energy over many lifetimes because a soul can not be born in one life time in my opinion, it takes alot of lifetimes to accumulate an infinite number of self-delusions into one place at one time in the infinite. some people have less baggage than others and therefore are able to become enlightened faster than others. if i had to explain in detail reality itself is an illusion creating machine so leo for example could have racked up 5 illusions over an infinity of time, the order of those illusions go: 1) I (not in words, in feeling, infinity feels like its alive) 2) i am alive (this is me, look i exsist) 3) i am 30 4) this is a cat 5) we is spelt W AND E lets say i myself have created 500 delusions, (my soul, just like leo's soul is his own<-- because he has amassed delusions of i) 1) i , 2) i am alive, 3) i eat chocolate 4) chocolate is brown 5) i have a sweet tooth 6) etc etc etc etc this is you building up karmic energy, You have to undo each of these delusions to see the self but they range in strength, size, because were talking about the power of imagination. we are all just an imagination, in reality nothing is happening. in TRUE REALITY and even the fact that we are souls is not happening with x number of delusions is not happening. these delusions are imaginary within the mind because infinity accepts everything as whole, so imaginary isn't even imaginary, its a word that does not exist in reality.
-
for absolute infinity to have a fininite mode of being, which includes the creation of souls, absolute infinity itself must create the illusion of life, multiple lifes = multiple souls by emperical numbers of past/ future however, when an enlightened master says they have seen their previous lives, it is not entirely correct. what they mean is visions that do not belong immediately in their experiencing gets downloaded into their heads in a matter of meditation, this can be interpretted as previous lives, and then you get the notion of souls, as i said the illusion of life= souls but really they're creating that awareness there and then and is as real as any other form of awareness, i.e the awareness of a dream like meditative state experiencing their previous lives is exactly the same as a person eat a cheeseburger. all stories can be justified thereafter and explanations given that its old lives.
-
Does anyone have any material/ know any material or how to become an enlightened master. for examples questions like what this means or any books etc, any practical ideas like watching how other enlightened beings react to questions.
-
Aakash replied to winterknight's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
yes further inquiry into the nature of the true self , its not just enough to realise the true self. i get what your saying theres no other people everthing is itself , this is what i was trying to ask about truth. that there is a difference i tried listing the qualities of being or truth here what i came up with so far Being is truth Being is oneness Being is awareness Being Is being Being Is unconditional love Being is the present moment Being is complete and happiness Being is infinite Being is eternal this are what i was asking that i need to encorporate, it is itself and these facets of the whole was the answer i was looking for otherwise it would be ignorance , thanks. -
Aakash replied to winterknight's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@winterknight thats my point it doesn't make sense , either way i am aware, so i was just wondering why enlightened people so to speak live up to such high ordeals in their lifes, like not lying , or helping out others and being selfless. there must be a truth that they're trying to cling to that says that this is the way i must act because this is the truth. what are those boundaries for those people that define things, are they not fully realised or something. ultimately there is no such thing as embodiment of truth, only embodiment of high values and truths but this itself gives notion that there is someone trying to sustain these high values and truths. do you get where i'm coming from? is it to do with desire -
Aakash replied to winterknight's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
i see thank you, that was helpful similarly what does it mean to live a life of truth? when everything of the mind is a self-deception or ego. does it mean to remain in silence ? -
Aakash replied to winterknight's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
how do i become an enlightened master? do i have to give up living in illusion and embody it, i'm kinda confused about where to go next. i'm not searching for the knower, but trying to get an understanding of what are the truths that enlightened masters live by in a sense, because there are many falsehoods, but the knower is still the knower. so how does this make sense? -
Aakash replied to andyjohnsonman's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
all religions do this, those devotees that devote themselves to the scriptures and act word for word instead of interpreting the underlying meaning, the underlying teaching of the truth are present in all religions, but yes your right it takes mystical experiences to understand brahman. it could be, but it's also very cultish in my opinion when harre krishnas are trying to convert people, like its their sworn mission i am only making assumptions and non tennable arguments but this is my perspective of it but yet again harre krishna the ones who understand also understand the true self which they call krishna again is an assumption -
Reality is like a giant mind a mind in which your mind resides in, want to know what others things resides in this mind? space, time, happiness, love, murder, human body, perception, energy, dualism, jackie chan, the brain, the trees, basically anything that you can ever think of is included in this mind, EVERYTHING is a self-delusion, (note: everything states that there is more than one, there's not, there is only the one) The one its self is self-delusion. the infinite mind, sees no distinction of what humans create dualistic terms for, it is aware of itself because it is the only thing that exsist. but the way that the finite mind (human minds) percieves, the duality between exsistance and non exsistance is created, and so the definitions are not the same, they need to be recontextualised. the non dualistic term for exsist, is it the only that is real( exsist) period. consciousness/awareness/moksha/god/ allah/bhraman/ nothingness/emptiness is all that exsist, we can understand this in concept EASILY, but its not a conceptual thing, its A POINTER to how the infinite mind creates the illusion! YES illusion that ITSELF is a finite being, the way in which it does this is it has to identify or intentively create a seperate self by creating a boundary that does not exsist (thats where the word illusion really means). the finite beings created are us! TOM, DICK AND HARRY, the illusions are A) these are three seperate beings B) harry head is bigger than harry so he must be different C) tom, well tom has blue eyes these are daily distinctions we make everyday because we take it for granted that we are the same consciousness, individuating into seperate selfs. the deceptions go on and on from the moment they started from the start of human history, THERE WAS NO HUMAN BEING IN THE FIRST PLACE IN HISTORY! there was only awareness and will always be only awareness, human being is a concept. there has never been anything such as a human being, but in this giant mind! it allows for every delusion to be created simulataneously. so while i'm sitting here writting on my laptop i can create 10 new delusions, and you who's reading can create 15 new delusions all you have to do is use your mind to create self-deceptions lets do an experiment 1) wait 5 seconds and continue reading, how many thoughts have you created each one of those are self-delusions. those 10 and 15 delusions you created are exactly the same as creating a delusion of seperate self's called tom, dick and harry. THE INFINITE MIND is infinite, like one giant mind, creating delusion after delusion. THEN when someone has truthed a delusion for themselves, another individual will believe it because it's been proofed. There is only one truth that can be absolute that truth is: all there is: is ..... [ insert word here] or the true self all other things are delusions because they create distinctions of any kind, this also includes how to live life in a certain way.. there is no way to correctly live life, but that doesn't stop you enjoying the illusion and creating a good life for yourself. The mechanism that things come into reality are by delusion of seperate self, and that includes perception of a seperate subject. which will either be the subject or object. perception comes from our five senses , our five sense hear,see,sound,etc, etc.. ALL DECEPTIONS, AFTER DECEPTIONS, AFTER DECEPTIONS there is no seperate object to sense , it only seems that way because of the thoughts you have or knowledge, whats really happening is: the same awareness or consciousness is interacting with itself, its aware of itself, but not as any self, just the sentence ends at its aware of itself. The infinite mind can create literally anything, itself is has no form or internal design, the maya is none other than illusion but only as illusory as real can be Hope this clarifies some things for you, got any questions let me know.
-
Aakash replied to Aakash's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@sleepyj i have reviewed my doubt, my mind got abit side tracked when we last spoke by the whole buddism tradition, but i'm certainly sure that the true self or eternal self is the one that i've found, its just so blindingly obvious that it just isn't recognised. I agree that compared to the method i used that the buddist tradition is more integrating and embodying of general pricipals and views for personal development, and as should be. However, the fact still remains is in truth you are what you are. I don't mean to say this in a hypothetical or dualistic way. I literally mean, the Self (I) is the self. even the actor who is the doubter is always still being experienced by someone/something, that very thing that can't turn its awareness on itself, to objectify it, because it is the awareness itself. rising up and coming out so to speak, (but even this is incorrect, its just what is here right here, right now) you don't need to tell the truth to find out who you are in other enlightenment methods, its just the underpinning foundation of the whole method. neither how you act or how you speak change the experience itself, it changes it better in dualistic sense , good vs bad, right vs wrong. these are all actions of the experiencing itself, they are still illusions created by the mind as a sense of self. i think the 10 fetters are there to be transcended all together, after i had a little thing about each one of them and them as a whole unit together. when you transcend it even for a momentary second, including the eight fold path and the four noble truths, all together you get a glimpse at what is already there. because the mind has grown silent and there is no talking. if you keep searching for something to happen, something miraculous. a new self to be born, consider this seeking will not result in you finding that truth. enlightenment is realisation not an event, and even realisation is used loosely so i don't even like that word anymore, i prefer the word used by rupert spira "remembering". getting masterful of the lifestyle is again integrated into the domain of buddahood, which it may not be in other systems. but the lifestyle itself does not change what you are again. it is a secondary layer, but the lifestyle ensure that you don't live a life of delusions, which must be taken seriously. however once again it does not change what you are. i myself am not completely resistant to delusion however, i'm adept enough to distinguish when a self-deception could be occuring and that is actually all the time. the only way to live a life completely without delusion is to join a zen monestry or any of those kind of things. because you sit in wakeful state all day and night. which is hardly possible in the west because we must communicate and use our minds. this is where you get masters of the lifestyle, and where right speech, or the eightfold comes in handy, still does not change what you are and that true self is pure awareness. (my favourite word i have decided for myself as god) -
The key to meditation is there is no destination, you have to reliquish the dooer and you'll reach some of the deepest levels without remembering your old meditations. because theres no timespace! you have to be the awareness itself! everything has to be like its you experiencing it for the first time good luck
-
if i said its the very fact that you are aware, that is enlightenment. what would you say to me?
-
Aakash replied to Aakash's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
# the different degrees of knowing! # enlightenednotenlightened #roadtobuddahhood #excusemecaniorderonecupofthehighestconsciousnesspossible this is the biggest mindfuck i've ever come across in my life "how do you know that what you know is true" -
Aakash replied to clouffy's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
YES enlightenment does solve all your problems just not the level of enlightenment that is easy to obtain you can start working on yourself now and make things better; but looking to solve your problems using enlightenment is not a practical solution to say the least. you'll be fishing in the ocean for a single fish. so i would just take the odds to use personal development work to solve your issue. but nonetheless it can help with understanding the problem of why you are suffering in more clear detail. overall the answer is both yes and no. -
Aakash replied to Aakash's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
OMG thats actually the funniest thing, its the 2nd fetter aswell ! You my friend, have made me see so clearly today. dude theres only one way to find out which spiritual teacher found the deepest insight, you have to take all teachings WORLDWIDE to its pinnacles you can never know except in your direct experience whether buddah had reached perfect enlightenment. you can never know if there is a teacher who had a better consciousness but literally YOU as the awareness you are can never know unless you try everything out. to get the deepest flavour of knowing! -
Aakash replied to winterknight's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@winterknight yup okay totally agree with you. i didn't know the part about the advance development bit, and i totally am an exception. i did self-inquiry for 6 years and 4 of those years i didn't know i was doing it. so i can see how that happened thank you -
Aakash replied to Aakash's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Leo Gura @sleepyj i think i've just realised that this is the whole problem with epistamology how do you know that what you know is truth you can't ever know, until all the questions you've ever thought about asking are answered. and even then how do you know you have asked all the questions what you know isn't absolute by any standards even if you say the truth has to be even if the truth hasn't been explored to its fullest degree how do you know the buddah experienced the highest consciousness or was he just a symbol for the fact that the highest consciousness is infinity how do you reach infinity and stop at infinity the answer is you don't. you can never know and thats why enlightened masters always refine their techniques. -
Aakash replied to Aakash's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
will certainly update if i come across a crazy realisation or something. thank you for your help -
Aakash replied to winterknight's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@winterknight i totally agree with you, in a sense yes i am talking about a system like the eight fold path because self-inquiry doesn't ensure that you develop in this way. it ensures that you find the true nature of the self which is the buddah nature in my opinion. yes other hindu systems exsist, but how comes self-inquiry (the method itself, while doing it) isn't able to encorporate such values and beliefs. to me its pure direct cut to the truth. but enlightenment doesn't garuntee development or maturation of the self and the method of self inquiry does not either. where as the method of reaching your buddahood has it incorporated into the structure as a whole. i guess what i'm really asking if enligthenment is enlightenment without any distinction is the end of self inquiry the same as reaching buddahnature? or does it exclude the development in certain areas.