Preety_India

Angels and A Oracle Deck 1. Druid 2. Elder 3. Father sky 4. Great teacher 5. Hermit 6. High Priest 7. High Priestess 8. Hunter 9. Knight 10. Lady 11. Lord 12. Medicine mother 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48.

Environmento tarot Deck. 48 card deck 1. Spring equinox rebirth 2. Full moon completion 3. 4. New moon promise 5. Cave sanctuary 6.iceberg submerged 7. Waterfall effortless 8. Wind. Activation 9. Winter Solstice. Reflection 10. Rain purification 11. Gaia nurturing 12. Ceremony. Invocation 13. Eagle. Communion 14. Desert. Vision quest 15. Dragonfly. Emergence 16. Music. Harmony. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48.

So I created some oracle cards And I will give names to these decks Gold Oracle deck Silver oracle deck Infinite Oracle deck 45 oracle deck 42 Oracle deck Environmento Oracle Deck Rebelo Oracle deck

Being attractive is the greatest compliment..

6 lenormand reading and a 12 lenormand reading.

Yep yep

First reading. Pick one pile and draw 3 cards. I got these. 2 archetype cards 2 oracle cards 2 tea leaves cards One totem card

Freedom of Speech.

@Hardkill terms of service

@soos_mite_ah the problem is not so much with the definition of a term or its miscommunication. The problem is the perspective and the right to hold that perspective and not impose your (does not mean you here) perspective on someone else's. For example, I can call Trump a dictator, maybe for someone else he is not a dictator. But I perceive him as a dictator. There is no common ground in such a case. There is no acceptable definition because most terms that are descriptive are ambiguous and their meanings are heavily conditioned by the opinions of the perceiver. Same goes for the terms like ugly or beautiful. And the same applies to terms like slut and player. I can call a guy a player for having multiple relationships whereas for someone else his behavior could be considered perfectly normal. We only have to accept that people have different perspectives.

You think that it's toxic. I don't think that it's toxic. I am fully within my right to hold my views and opinions. I have called a specific behavior promiscuous behavior. You're the one who is acting like you have the higher ground here. Nobody has a superior or inferior opinions. People can think what they want as long as it's not a personal attack on you. Stop guilting me when I'm sorry for nothing. I'm not replying to you anymore because you won't stop. I already said the same thing a dozen times. I'm done with it. If you can't move on, your problem.

No its you who thinks something is toxic. Having a definition on a term is not toxic just because you want to sit on your high horse and judge me as a bad. You're nobody to say that it's a mistake. There is no mistake and there is no immaturity. Stop acting like you have the right to preach others on how they should think.

It means different things to different people. Omg that's an ambiguous term.

No that's not what it means. It can mean a lot of things. It can mean promiscuous sexual behavior. Stop preaching me and teaching me. There is absolutely no mistake in what I said. Most people are aware of what that word generally applies to.

Everyone has their definition of what that word means. And you can't decide what someone thinks.

Oh now come on, I should not have a perspective on sexual behaviors. That's like unhealthy to me tbh.

Well I learned that word from you.

But you don't have the right to judge if you get outraged by others judgement

The hypocrisy is when you freely call women idiots. That's the real hypocrisy.

Hello, I didn't name call you ok. Spare me your outrage. I have the right to define what the word slut means in my own way. Who are you to dictate me what it's definition should be? Who are you to decide that a woman who takes money for sex is a slut? Don't impose your opinions on others and dictate them how to define things. Did I call you anything? No.. So you shouldn't have any reason to be outraged. Just like how you think that a woman exchanging sex for money is a slut, I think that a woman who sleeps around with several men is a slut. If you can call women idiots and you can have your own opinion, then hello, why can't I have my opinions ??

Because that's my perspective and I've every right to my perspective. Everyone has a right to their opinion. I'm not looking at that as slut shaming. Maybe if a woman is flirting with a guy and being looked at with contempt is slut shaming in my eyes. So different people are going to have different definitions of the same thing. You can't control how people think.

To each his own. Everyone has different perspectives and preferences. I don't have internalized misogyny so don't put that to me. I was talking about standards and boundaries. And different people look at the same aspect differently.

They are celebrities for a reason. They are attractive. That's the game. The game lies in their ability to attract.