Preety_India

There are things that we cannot fix for some people. Nobody should give a pity fuck because it's just that - a pity fuck. There are many guys who tell me that they would commit suicide if I didn't sleep with them. Should I sleep with them because they might die if I didn't? We are not responsible for someone's lack of things that puts them out of the dating circle Do people deserve to get herpes just because people with the disease need someone to sleep with? This rationale is highly illogical. If they can't date anymore, it's definitely an issue, but we can't fix it, and absolutely cannot fix it by dating them. Maybe the solution would be for science to find better ways to prevent the spread of herpes. At least till such a solution is found, there is no option but to stay celibate. And let's not say life is all about romance. Some people are happy being celibate and there are so many things to find beauty in other than romance. He can find happiness in other ways. There is also something called as coping with life circumstances that he will learn some excellent insights from. Life can be beautiful even without sex and romance. There is no stigmatizing of those infected. Simply a question of personal safety. Of course we should be open to dating anyone, but equally open to our own safety.

@Leo Gura doesn't your steel pan ever burn or has food sticking to it? How do you get around that? I saw you making fried eggs but didn't notice the pan.

Right wing propaganda nonsense.

I mean someone can always tell me that I'm uneducated on this disease.

I can play this forever.

@Emerald that comment picture kind of reminds me instantly of the trope "I'm not like other women", @soos_mite_ah has a nice journal entry on it.

@Lyubov she looks very beautiful.

I can't use a steel one. It gets all burned and food sticks to it. I use Teflon one But I know it can be toxic though I don't face any problems with it..

^this. I agree that toxic masculinity is a problem but she tried to blame it all on women. She gotta be kidding.

Me personally. Not at all. I suck at it. And I leave it be. Because frankly who got the time? Imo, it's the parents who need to grow up and actually act like parents. I mean some parents act like they need diapers.

@Roy A true Alpha is actually secure.

@Forestluv@Forestluv criticizing and debating is productive only as long as two people want to learn something from each other otherwise it's an ego fest. @Origins . Sorry got tagged again.

One thing that I distinctly remember while reading about these things is thinking this - you can't build happiness on someone's misfortune. During that entire interview, Diana makes her position as a manipulative little gold-digger very clear. You need to put this in the light of the fact that both her grandmother's married millionaires twenty three years older than themselves, that her mother married the heir to an earldom, 16 years older than herself and then cheated on him with other millionaires who were more fun and were celebrities, which he was not.Diana's sisters both married very rich men considerably older than themselves, while her brother's first wife was a catwalk model.. Diana's nickname, from childhood, was"Duchess" because she planned on marrying a duke. She went one better and married the HEIR TO THE THRONE. > She spend that entire inteview looking incredibly smug and self satisfied, but NEVER looks lovingly at Charles. She shoots quick glances at him, but Never responds to his loving gaze.The interviewer is TRYING HARD to get her to co-operate. She plays little "shy girlish"games like a nine-year-old. Not like a young woman who had the best possible education, including elocution, and who then was sent to a Swiss Finishing School.Her immaturity is Pathetic. The games that she plays in the interview are quite horrid. She drops her voice so the interviewer can hardly hear, and then gets cross when he repeats a question. It is one bloody-minded little passive/aggressive game after another. So when asked "...and in love, I suppose?"she droops her head, looks crossly from under her hair, purses her lips and goes bright red in the face. She MUTTERS "Yes,of course!"Why do you think that she is so negative,and looks SO EMBARRASSED about being questioned about being "in love"? She IS PLAINLY not "in love". She is marrying the HEIR TO THE THRONE and will one day fulfil a dream of being Queen. Charles has been trying to fend off all the sticky questions. When she is asked.. he bends his head and gazes at her ADORINGLY and in expectation that she will look BACK and state that she loves him.She DOESN'T. She MUMBLES the Least answer that she could possibly give (unless she actually told the truth).She says "Yes, of course, and Avoids Charles.There is NO MUTUAL FEELING. He adores her, but she is USING him.Charles does not understand WHY she looks embarrassed... but he tries to cover for HER by asking a semantic question about what "in love" means.Diana, who is NOT a Cambridge scholar,does not understand the question and Now has a reason to be offended. She never did understand that question.The reason why YOU dod not understand it is because you have not put it in the context of Diana's un-going manipulation of that entire interview.

Agree. I think it's a natural masculine attribute.

@somegirl if someone left me for that, I would simply accept it. It's just honest reality.

It was Christmas, 1995 and 100 or so colleagues were celebrating the end of the year at London's five-star Lanesborough Hotel.The guests were all staff members of the Prince and Princess of Wales. Despite the fact the royal couple had separated three years earlier, they had maintained a joint office.Now it was a chance for their equerries, secretaries and myriad of other support personnel to let their hair down. The mood was jubilant by all accounts and the drink was flowing.What happened next was an incident that still lives on in royal infamy, and which dramatically put a spotlight on a simmering dislike Diana had been fermenting.you be a bit blunt and a bit specific?, I'm not good with metaphorical and figurative language Just wanted a clearer elaborate explanation of the point. According to a number of reports from eyewitnesses who were there on the night, Diana strode towards one particular blonde female employee. When the royal got close, she said in a voice loud enough that others could hear, "So sorry to hear about the baby."The woman, Tiggy Legge-Bourke, Princes William and Harry's beloved nanny, burst into tears and left the room.The scene was perhaps one of the more disgraceful alleged episodes in the tawdry War of the Wales that dominated the global press for much of the '90s.Tiggy might have ostensibly been a lowly nanny, but her innocuous title and paltry salary belied the central place she occupied in all three Princes' lives. For years, she had been a key source of steadfast emotional support and joy for Wills and Harry as their parents duked it out on the front pages of British tabloids and behind closed doors.However, rumours about Tiggy's relationship with Charles had been brewing. Photos of the Prince of Wales greeting her with kisses on the cheek in public had only served to set tongues wagging with speculation of just how close the 40-something royal was to the woman he trusted to care for his sons.While Tiggy left Charles' employ in 1999 when she married, this week she re-entered the spotlight after she was photographed attending Archie Harrison Mountbatten Windsor's highly secretive Windsor christening.

@Origins sorry you got tagged. I love TEAL SWAN but my only problem is that I can't watch her videos. I get hypnotized while watching. I don't know why that happens every time and I have to gather myself every time after watching her every 20 seconds. Otherwise she is cool.

@Bazooka Jesus that's a very valid point.

@snowyowl what do you think about the situation regarding how P Diana was treated by the royal family.

Everything is so cruel in the world. Why didn't she this coming.

I'm thinking about Princess Diana currently What ramifications her death had. I'm thinking what could have gone wrong. Was watching the documentary conspiracy. And I wonder why she never took the help of Scotland Yard to safeguard her on the night in Ritz Hotel Paris, if only she had trusted someone better at the job, instead she relied on stupid hotel security to take care of the business, and the guy entrusted Henry Paul was drunk, what made her so foolish about her own security? Is it escaping the paparazzi, is it wanting to hide her affair with Dodi, the thing is she had nothing to lose even if she had been with Dodi and publicly admitted to it,her need to hide the affair from the public, cost her, her life. Made her reckless. I wonder what life would be like if she were still alive today. Her death was heartbreaking. I watched her death years after she had died but just looking at her pictures, there are just so many emotions. She really looked like a confident woman ready to take over the world, yet lost herself so early in her life, her tragic death would always serve as a reminder of how brutal life is and nobody is really immune to this brutality, no matter what power or wealth they possess. It's a shame how the royal family treated them.

You can't expect a conducive system to evolve on its own for you because that doesn't happen.

Yesss Focus should be so much on these. Leave all unconscious people behind.

The most important thing to remember here is that You need to build your own system and this is completely your own responsibility. The other thing is the fortress system

The question is why did they move out in the first place. Because the royal family wasn't ready to equip them on royal terms.