Leo Gura

Administrator
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    65,308

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Leo Gura

  2. Posted · Edited by Leo Gura

    6 minutes ago, Lyubov said:

    I scrolled on tinder in my relationship and my girlfriend found out and it really was hurtful to her and I don’t do it anymore.

    But he didn't do that. He told her first that he wants a triad, then they split up, then they discussed it, she agreed, and then he went on Tinder to create what they agreed to. And he didn't just bang the new girl, he introduced her to his first girl and they all got along well and became friends.

    She agreed to this. Stop treating her like a child.

  7. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Emerald said:

    Hey Leo. God just commanded me to take all of your money away from you for your own good, while I keep it for safe keeping.

    It's this new enlightened way where all of humanity is embraces a non-materialistic lifestyle. 

    And I will guide you in the difficulties and aversions you'll feel as it is hard to open up your boundaries to let money flow out and love flow in.

    You make a mockery of inspiration, which shows you don't understand God.

  9. Posted · Edited by Leo Gura

    19 minutes ago, Emerald said:

    It's no different than a crackhead convincing himself into hearing a commandment from God to do more crack.

    You are trivializing his motives by comparing it to a crackhead.

    If God inspires him to find a wonderful partner to impregnant, that is fair game. That's a huge opportunity for practicing love. Not like a crackhead.

    Quote

    Of course, it could happen. But what's more likely? That God commanded Aubrey to scroll around on Tinder looking for attractive women? Or that Aubrey wanted to scroll around on Tinder looking for attractive women, and that he convinced himself that God told him to?

    Aubrey IS God. He is guiding himself and others around him towards a higher kind of love.

    Isn't that obvious?

    That's what his own channel and life is about.

  10. Posted · Edited by Leo Gura

    10 minutes ago, Emerald said:

    Convenient how God chimed in with its absolute authority to encourage him to scroll around on Tinder (given his past issues with infidelity).

    It's like a crackhead who is trying to convince himself that he wants to stop smoking crack. And he was about to! But then God chimed in and commands him to reach out to his dealer. 

    That's how inspiration works.

    That kind of cynicism could be applied to monogamy. How convenient when a priest blesses your marriage or children! How convenience God inspired you to have children or love your partner. Of course God wants what you want for yourself.

    Of course everything spiritual humans do gets tangled up with survival.

    This love tricycle could be a great growth opportunity for the 3 of them. In which case God approves ;)

    Or maybe God wants to teach them a painful lesson about self-deception.

    That is none of your business.

  12. Posted · Edited by Leo Gura

    16 minutes ago, Emerald said:

    And it's also calling polyamory monogamy... thus muddying the waters further. 

    That part I agree is delusional.

    It's not monogamy. It's rather typical polyamory.

    Quote

    Plus, he's weaving together narratives to God told him to go on Tinder... and that God told him to impregnate both women.

    I don't really have a problem with that. Yes, Universal Mind can give insights like that. I mean, he is God.

    If he feels it is a good idea to impregnate both of them, who are you to say he is wrong? He could be right.

  14. Posted · Edited by Leo Gura

    7 minutes ago, Extreme Z7 said:

    what do you think of Gary Stevenson's work then?

    I like him, but realistically his message is not going to be effective. He wants people to focus on political activism as a means of improving their economic situation, which is not going to really work.

    Government is not going to fix your economic situation. Although, yes, we should tax the rich more.

    If you are a serious person you have to drop the notion that government is going to help you. Government only helps the mega donors in any meaningful way, which is corruption.

    Gary sells the fantasy that government will help you. This is a dangerous notion for young people to believe in.

  15. Posted · Edited by Leo Gura

    27 minutes ago, Xonas Pitfall said:

    The alternative is him being honest with her and saying he doesn’t love her as much as she loves him, that he wants more options, sex, exploration, and not being committed to her in the way she wants, and the way she originally said in the podcast she always wished and longed for.

    But he did effectively say/do that. She decided to stick around.

    Yes, he somewhat coerced her to rethink her relationship plans. But she seems to be okay with that. It's not like she really knew what she wanted. People's plans and expections can change. She was willing to explore a new kind of relationship, which comes with rewards and risks.

    As long as he was honest with her, then I don't see a problem here. She has gotten all kinds of benefits.

    Maybe letting go of what she wished and longed for is not so bad for her. Monogamy is not necessarily as great as it seems. It gets old after a while. She has a more exciting and dynamic life now. She can choose to like that or leave.

  19. Posted · Edited by Leo Gura

    Well, I got around to watching most of the video.

    You guys are being way too critical and cynical.

    What they are doing feels authentic to them. Whether is succeeds or not, they will all grow from it and it's better than what most couples do.

    I see no problem here.

    They are just doing conscious polyamory. It's actually a good demo of conscious relationship.

    They are doing conscious relationship in a triad.

  20. Posted · Edited by Leo Gura

    4 hours ago, Karmadhi said:

    It is not that they are naive about how things work, they just want things to be better

    You are pragmatic and grounded in brutal reality, they are idealistic and grounded in the fight for a better world

    That is the core difference

    I claim that they ARE naive and do not understand how survival works.

    This is a limit of their paradigmn and its leathally dangerous, as seen with Marxist revolutions of the 20th century. And leftists still have not learned those lessons. This is why I make the points I do.

    But hey, I'm just Leosplaining into the abyss.