Leo Gura

That part I agree is delusional. It's not monogamy. It's rather typical polyamory. I don't really have a problem with that. Yes, Universal Mind can give insights like that. I mean, he is God. If he feels it is a good idea to impregnate both of them, who are you to say he is wrong? He could be right.

That's not true though from what she said and how she acts. She is clearly friendly with the other girl and benefits from that relationship. You have to be careful not to project your assumptions onto her.

I like him, but realistically his message is not going to be effective. He wants people to focus on political activism as a means of improving their economic situation, which is not going to really work. Government is not going to fix your economic situation. Although, yes, we should tax the rich more. If you are a serious person you have to drop the notion that government is going to help you. Government only helps the mega donors in any meaningful way, which is corruption. Gary sells the fantasy that government will help you. This is a dangerous notion for young people to believe in.

But he did effectively say/do that. She decided to stick around. Yes, he somewhat coerced her to rethink her relationship plans. But she seems to be okay with that. It's not like she really knew what she wanted. People's plans and expections can change. She was willing to explore a new kind of relationship, which comes with rewards and risks. As long as he was honest with her, then I don't see a problem here. She has gotten all kinds of benefits. Maybe letting go of what she wished and longed for is not so bad for her. Monogamy is not necessarily as great as it seems. It gets old after a while. She has a more exciting and dynamic life now. She can choose to like that or leave.

But, like, what's the alternative? If he isn't happy with monogamy then it wouldn't have worked out anyway. If she doesn't want it, it's her responsibility to leave. It's a good lesson for her.

I found their whole vibe authentic and very conscious. How they behave off screen is anyone's guess, but on screen they are doing great. I don't see any need to criticize them.

As if I only register words.

Well, I got around to watching most of the video. You guys are being way too critical and cynical. What they are doing feels authentic to them. Whether is succeeds or not, they will all grow from it and it's better than what most couples do. I see no problem here. They are just doing conscious polyamory. It's actually a good demo of conscious relationship. They are doing conscious relationship in a triad.

I claim that they ARE naive and do not understand how survival works. This is a limit of their paradigmn and its leathally dangerous, as seen with Marxist revolutions of the 20th century. And leftists still have not learned those lessons. This is why I make the points I do. But hey, I'm just Leosplaining into the abyss.

The creation of art is not luxury. This should go without saying.

Then how are African women having 10 children while living homeless in a warzone?

Very New Age of you to conclude that that is why she can't have kids.

Leftist: *pulls down pants* Her: Hey! I thought you said you have a footlong? Leftist: *proudly* I describe things as they should be.

Let me Leosplain this to you...

It's a very real thing.

Realsplaining Hardsplaining Truthbombing Doomsplaining Leosplaining

I don't know. That's up to you to decide. Be careful not to overuse the leftplaining concept. It can easily become a thought-terminating cliche.

That's why I'm starting a whorehouse

No, unless you're using art for status or as part of the pursuit of luxury. Art as luxury would be buying a famous painting so you can show it off to your rich friends.

I don't understand your point.

There is a lack of reality on this issue on the left. No amount of quibbling, hairsplitting, or left-splaining can undermine that point.

@Nilsi Do you understand why luxury is an obstacle to truth? Don't get lost in nitpicking the things I say, grasp the larger point. There's always a larger point at stake.

He seems like a legit yogi from what I've seen of him. Though I haven't dug too deeply into his community and so forth. I don't have a problem with legit yogis. They are a net good for the world. I get the sense that he is genuine and good-hearted, but appearance can be deceiving.

@Karmadhi I don't have a problem with action against Israel. My problem is with the lack of deep understanding, the skewing of the situation by leftists. Leftists are sacrificing truth and understanding for social justice, which is what I oppose. Truth must come first, social justice second, not the other way around. Israel can be sanctioned without the ideological thinking. The protestor ideology is what I oppose. The hysterical genocide chants and so forth. This precludes serious understanding of a complex situation, which is necessary to solve it.

You can dress well without luxury. I am not against dressing well. Luxury isn't about utility or even aesthetics, it's about status. Must I post this?: