Leo Gura

This is a great point.

Todd Howard has turned Bethesda into McDonalds for gamers. Bethesda is dead to me.

If you're gonna make mega threads could you at least spell and capitalize the title properly?

No. It's not the same at all. Serious love and relationship takes commitment and effort. That's very different from chasing after sexual excitement. Pickup involves effort too, but it's not the same. Being a gangster also takes effort. That doesn't make the activity very conscious.

I said *could*, not would.

The dispute was not about whether he was right-wing but whether he was conservative.

In this thread I'm not telling you how you should live your life, whether you should pursue sex or not. I only explained the connection between sex and low consciousness. You do whatever you want. You decide for yourself how ethical you wish to be.

You guys are not yet aware of how much manipulation you do. It takes many years to understand it.

If you're having sex with dozens and hundreds of girls, you're def hurting some of them in that process. Most PUAs are so selfish and unconscious that they don't even know when they hurt girls. I'm not saying hurting is mandatory. I'm just saying it tends to come with the pursuit of sex. Sex is a very corrupting force. Does that mean it is gauranteed to corrupt you? No.

The manipulation of people to maximize sexual opportunity is low consciousness. Just in general, sex and everything revolving around sex is low consciousness. The reason that is, is because the only reason you care about sex at all is because it is mechanically coded in your animal nature. And as you pursue that sex you lose consciousness to attain it. You lie. You manipulate. You cheat. You hurt others. All for a few minutes of pleasure and excitement. Have sex if you wish. Just notice what you're doing to get it. But also, if you repress, deny, or neglect your sex drive, that could be even worse.

No. This is the lesson of the thread.

Human survival has always been more about social skill than physical size. Which is why women are most attracted to leadership, status, charisma, and social intelligence. Women aren't stupid. They like exactly what helps their children survive. Women don't need your muscles, they need your leadership and social connections.

No, your mind is just filled with liberal nonsense.

Do you guys even know that if a woman has sex before marriage in Iraq or Afghanistan, this brings so much shame to her family that custom demands that her own father or brother kill her, in order to bring honor back to the family. That's life in Afghanistan for women. Not your liberal shit. The Nazis were libs relative to the Taliban.

There are healthy and unhealthy forms of nationalism. Nationalism is necessary. But it is like handling a cobra who will bite you if you make a wrong move.

Until she gets raped and impregnated and runs to you crying. Then you will understand why conservatives are conservative.

Only because you are a crazy lib. In Iran it is illegal for women to not wear a head scarf. In Afghanistan it is illegal for women to go to high school.

There are many conservative women around the world, and they are happy that way.

If you were properly conservative, allowing women to show their faces would be liberal and evil af. What decent man would allow his women to be such sluts? Would you let your daughter leave the house with her tits hanging out?

Remember, where you draw the line between left and right is relative and up to you. You could draw it at the Taliban. Then anyone more liberal than the Taliban is left wing. Are you okay with women showing their faces in public? Then you're a sick Satanic liberal and you deserve a beheading

It is a problem. Nationalism is a problem whenever the nation becomes a higher priority than truth and what is right. If you love your own people too much it makes you too biased to operate properly in the world. Which then creates situations like Gaza. See, ideally you would love Palestinians equal to Israelis, because the truth is that neither one of you is more important. If you think that Israelis are more important that other groups of people, that's a falsehood which will corrupt your whole understanding of reality.

There's a Zen center near LA.

Where I will agree with you is that it is easier to create an egalitarian society if it is ethnically homogeneous. No, it could not, because even if Hitler won the war, he would have enslaved half the planet under his sick rule and they would not just quietly obey, there would be ongoing rebellion, sabotage, and violence because Hitler's fantasy of a Third Reich was fundamentally unstable. Hitler would not succeed in eliminating all the minorities and getting everyone to agree to his style of governance. Nazism is an incoherent and unstable system. It can never succeed no matter how hard you push it. Because it is based on domination of those who disagree with you. Even Hitler's own commanders tried to assassinate him. Because they couldn't stand his authoritarian ways. Hitler was not a nice guy to deal with even for his own Aryan brothers. He was like Trump. Trump is an asshole even to his own family. Stable leadership requires a cooperative, collaborative, respectful, and peaceful approach. This is why all dictatorships fail.

Obviously it does. But I think it's rampant within the government bureaucracy. Even many leftist or centrist Israelis have a strong sense of national identity, Zionism, and patriotism. Because it benefits them.