Leo Gura

You guys have a lot of fantasies on this topic. Go put them to the test.

No

@Past-Philosopher-562 Just start contemplating. Not sure what else to tell you. Come up with examples of what you mean by frame and why is it important.

Enough with the gay enticements.

You gotta reframe it as fun. If you aren't having fun then you're doing it wrong and you will fail. Of course it still takes a lot of energy and discipline, so it's not easy.

It's hard to say. Over 100. These can be quick approaches. I am not great at game. Other guys are much better than me. Also, I have much higher standards than most guys so this hurts my results a lot.

I regard no-fap as nonsense. At least for me. Of course if you are horned up like a dog you will be more motivated to chase girls and thereby get more of them.

It's not about the pleasure. It's about the adventure and growth.

That's what being attractive gets you.

Nope. They'd have to go on a date first to appreciate my cheapness.

Cold approach allows you to overcome much of that with sheer volume of approaches and opportunities.

I am too cheap to buy girls dinner. Sugar daddy is not in my DNA.

There is a parellel. I have had new insights into how attraction really works. And I am not only talking about cold approach. I am talking about all of attraction. For example, if I was better looking I would have more girls just emailing me for sex. So when I say 1000%, I am counting all avenues for sex.

Depends on how good you can dance. Clearly your dance skills are weak.

Yes! You go run a test. Create 2 male online dating profiles. Keep them identical except for pics of an above average guy and a below average guy. Wait a week and count how many messages each guy gets. Actually do it. Put your theory to the test. I did. The answer is crystal clear.

I'm not kidding.

1000% more.

It's just a matter of risk. You can play with fire if you accept the risks.

No. That's not it. Looks matter to women. Stop with the rationalizations.

If you are prone to panic attacks you should stay away from 5-MeO.

What threatens Putin the most is organic pro-democracy movements at home. And the next worse thing is such a movement in Ukraine because if Ukraine goes successfully into democracy then Russians will rise up and ask for democracy in Russia. Which means Putin's death. For corruption to survive it must corrupt everything around itself. Robust Western democracy is poison to any authoritarian. That's the real issue here and with China. They want to become advanced superpower nations but they refuse to open up access to power and clean up their corrupt ways, which leads to a groteque, backwards system. They want to treat democracy as though it were optional. But it's too deep of an issue to be optional. Superpower status is entangled with democracy.

The core problem that Putin has with the West, and what fuels this conflict, is that his authortrian grip on power would never be allowed in a Western democracy. It is because Putin wants life-long power that he must oppose the West. Yes, the CIA tries to overthrow him because he refuses to leave office and he suppresses any organic political opposition. The CIA is wrong in their meddling but Putin is not right either. It would be better for Russia if there was genuine democratic opposition and term limits.

It was wrong for the US to attempt a coup in Cuba. So that answers that.

Human mating isn't something men or women control. Humans have certain mating habit just like animals have certain mating habits. Humans have never been a strictly monogamous species. But nor are they strictly polygamous. It's somewhere in between. To frame that as something women are doing is kinda silly. Takes two to tango.

Weasel. Haha