Leo Gura

Is ONE just a concept or something more?

He's a popular right-wing YouTuber. I made a blog about his problematic work a month or two ago.

The ego experiences some mystical stuff and then clings to it to create a spiritual ego. Ego then seeks to monopolize God for itself, going as far as proclaiming itself to be the only source of truth in the world and necessary for the world's salvation. This is how many cults leaders operate. It's a kind of spiritual narccisism. God is corrupted by conflating it with the ego's survival agenda. The work hasn't been done to actually make all that survival agenda conscious and to transcend it. This is what happens when the ego doesn't understand all the survival mechanisms that run it. Rudyard is a textbook example of how doing spirituality by yourself can go horribly wrong and why gurus and masters are usually needed. The master can point out the egoic self-deceptions and traps, setting a high standard.

All of this is litterally hearsay. You are believing people. That was my only point here. It doesn't matter what Campbell or Ra says because to you it's just a story. Campbell goes not understand what God is.

When we say that reality or God is ONE, is that just a human invention? A symbolic thing? Or is ONE something deeper? And if ONE is something deeper then what about 2? And the rest? Things for ya'll to contemplate.

I didn't say that. I understand reality from an absolute level, not in all its detail and endless forms. It's unknown what can be cracked until you try. You have to put skin in the game. You have to risk something. Is that true? Maybe there's more to math than that. Contemplate: What is math and what makes it work?

I have no problem understanding it. It's hearsay and fantasies. I introduced Law of One to this community.

This is so creepy.

Why do you assume I haven't?

Just hearsay.

It certainly is not that. Computers perform multiplication. They are not just reading answers off some pre-calculated table. You can build a mechanical, physical, multiplication machine. That is the basis for all CPUs and GPUs.

They are. Especially in cases like these which is technical analytic philosophy. Philosophy of mathematics is a serious field. You can get a PhD in it.

The foundations are mathematics is not kindergarten stuff, it is serious work that even university professors don't fully grasp. Entire books have been written trying to explain the foundations of basic arithmetic and stuff like 1+1=2. It's not obvious what makes math true. I took an entire graduate level philosophy class on 1+1=2. I dropped out of the class because it was too hard.

I prefer to see multiplication as groupings vs addition. One group of one is one. Ten groups of ten is one hundred. This notion of grouping then fits nicely with the notion of division. One group of any number is then equal to itself. One 6-pack of Coke is 6.

I would not want to taint a psychedelic trip with such nonsense.

He is too far gone to listen to someone like me. He lacks the openmindedness and epistemic humility necessary for real spiritual work. He can't even get basic history right without corrupting it with his massive ego, nevermind understanding God correctly. No he isn't. That's the whole problem.

These people are so stupid it's astounding:

If your wife gives birth to 1 child 1 time, congrats, you are now the father of 2 children. Act fast, God's giving away two for the price of one! Terrance Howard logic.

Lolz

I am fluent in Russian speech. I listen to Putin in Russian. The American translations of Putin are quite bad. I could translate him more accurately.

You can define/construct multiplication in various ways, however you want, but then you must be consistent in your application of that definition. That is the problem with Howard's approach. If Howard eats one pizza once a day, how many pizzas did he eat if one day passed? 2 pizzas?

Very dubious statements.

Nice report. Great. You entered the gate. But you have yet to be skull-raped by Infinity.

Haha!

1) I doubt Deepak would talk to me. 2) I don't see the point in talking to people who already understand spirituality. It's preaching to a preist. What interests me is talking to people who don't understand God. There I can make a valuable contribution. Mr Girl and I could have a very interesting conversation about spirituality because he would ask interesting and challenging questions.