Leo Gura

I can be wrong about anything and I can change my mind about anything. But the only way I would regard MAGA, Trumpism, or Rudyard's ideas as something more than delusion, ignorance, and pervertry is if a horse kicked me in the head and broke my brain.

She was a very New Age person who lives in so much New Age fantasy and so unwilling to deconstruct that fantasy that I cannot live with such a girl. My whole life is about deconstructing illusions and her whole life is about playing inside illusions. There were other factors but that was the most serious one.

That's a strawman of my view. Never have I claimed something so stupid as that all left wing ideas are normal and all right wing ideas are stupid or wrong. I have published plenty of criticism of the progressive and socialist left. And I have devoted a lot of effort to understand rather than strawman the right.

It ended because we were not compatible in fundamental ways. Our values were contradictory and it took time to see that.

The same thing I hear every right-winger say when their ignorant ideas are rejected or called out for the nonsense that it is. Your games have all be played out here. You think this is the first time a right-winger has gaslit me?

Or you just underestimate the craftiness of our ancestors. But either way, you are speculating and making all sorts of assumptions. This thread has gotten way off topic. If you wish to discuss this further, start a new thread.

Yeah, I know. He's very wrong about Infinity. However I still think his model is centered around God. He just doesn't understand that God is Infinity. But how do you know what he tells you is true? That's still hearsay. What the hell does this have to do with how the pyramids of Egypt were built? I have the very orgonite of which you speak. My New Age ex-girlfriend gave it to me for Valentines day. It sits on my bookshelf.

By studying and contemplating all the traps. Which is why I detailed all the traps of this work for you guys very explicitly. I also shared all the best books and sources you need to avoid all the traps. So your work is not limited by my own limits or teachings. I emphasized a multi-perspectival approach. If Rudyard was openminded enough to watch all my videos he would know about all the traps he's fallen into. I explained all this stuff years ago. Well, I fell into some spiritual ego too. But what saved me was that I'm very serious about proper epistemology and identifying my own biases. I am non-ideological and very openminded, which Rudyard is not. He's also way too young and immature for this kind of work. And he's coming at it with a huge political agenda, which is a grave mistake. I never had a political agenda. If I did that would corrupt all my work. It's a matter of degree. There are many degrees of it. And doing it as a public influencer is much harder because everyone is constantly criticizing and judging you. In the worst case degree you will become a cult leader who harms and misleads millions. Connor is mentally ill. I don't consider Rudyard mentally ill, although who knows.

But what about the underlying unit or quantity? What is that?

Let it go, bro. Let it go.

I don't think he's an atheist. Have you spoken to Ra? Do you have direct experience of how the pyramids were built and by whom? I have a pretty low opinion of occultists because I have seen how their minds work and I was not impressed, to put it kindly. Most of them are pre-rational minds with very poor epistemology who believe whatever their intuitions tell them and whatever New Age stuff they read. Any kind of factual information gotten from the occult realms should be very suspect. Like how the pyramids were built. That is a factual material question. If you actually bother to study some archaeology and Egyptology you will see it was clearly built by human hands. Maybe they had some help from aliens by way of contact or information exchange. I am open to that.

I speak to my Mom in Russian. We spoke Russian in the family all the time growing up.

Is ONE just a concept or something more?

He's a popular right-wing YouTuber. I made a blog about his problematic work a month or two ago.

The ego experiences some mystical stuff and then clings to it to create a spiritual ego. Ego then seeks to monopolize God for itself, going as far as proclaiming itself to be the only source of truth in the world and necessary for the world's salvation. This is how many cults leaders operate. It's a kind of spiritual narccisism. God is corrupted by conflating it with the ego's survival agenda. The work hasn't been done to actually make all that survival agenda conscious and to transcend it. This is what happens when the ego doesn't understand all the survival mechanisms that run it. Rudyard is a textbook example of how doing spirituality by yourself can go horribly wrong and why gurus and masters are usually needed. The master can point out the egoic self-deceptions and traps, setting a high standard.

All of this is litterally hearsay. You are believing people. That was my only point here. It doesn't matter what Campbell or Ra says because to you it's just a story. Campbell goes not understand what God is.

When we say that reality or God is ONE, is that just a human invention? A symbolic thing? Or is ONE something deeper? And if ONE is something deeper then what about 2? And the rest? Things for ya'll to contemplate.

I didn't say that. I understand reality from an absolute level, not in all its detail and endless forms. It's unknown what can be cracked until you try. You have to put skin in the game. You have to risk something. Is that true? Maybe there's more to math than that. Contemplate: What is math and what makes it work?

I have no problem understanding it. It's hearsay and fantasies. I introduced Law of One to this community.

This is so creepy.

Why do you assume I haven't?

Just hearsay.

It certainly is not that. Computers perform multiplication. They are not just reading answers off some pre-calculated table. You can build a mechanical, physical, multiplication machine. That is the basis for all CPUs and GPUs.

They are. Especially in cases like these which is technical analytic philosophy. Philosophy of mathematics is a serious field. You can get a PhD in it.

The foundations are mathematics is not kindergarten stuff, it is serious work that even university professors don't fully grasp. Entire books have been written trying to explain the foundations of basic arithmetic and stuff like 1+1=2. It's not obvious what makes math true. I took an entire graduate level philosophy class on 1+1=2. I dropped out of the class because it was too hard.