Leo Gura

@Husseinisdoingfine Yes, of course, classic Blue.

@Mikael89 You have to distinguish between Absolute and relative domains of knowledge. Nonduality is about the Absolute. In the relative you can still be very deluded or mistaken.

@Carl-Richard Classic

This kind of stuff requires higher forms of world government which even America and Europe is not yet ready for. The notion that you can just treat the whole world as one giant collection of humans and just distribute resources to whoever needs it << we don't live in such a world, not politically. The world is deeply divided and tribal still. Which creates all sorts of inequalities that cannot be easily equalized from one part to another. Help from outside can work. It just has is limits. The country has to develop to a higher point on the Spiral, which takes hundreds of years. Any country Orange and below will have crippling poverty. We at least need stage Green. And people love to hate Green these days even in developed countries. Which shows you the depth of our problem. Poverty is not really a farming or shipping problem, it's a mental development problem. It's a catch-22. You need better access to food to increase mental development. But you need high mental development to create better access to food. So there is a lot of struggle and slippage as the process tries to bootstrap itself.

You're not horrible, you're just engaging in creating illusions and playing sneaky games. That's life as a human. It's sneaky.

I'm not sitting in a cave. I was trying to create a deep romantic relationship. I will create a video about Conscious Relationships in the future. Once you see it, you'll see me in a different light. I just haven't had the time to shoot it yet. Nothing I said is Redpill. I got no animosity towards women and I disagree with most of the Redpill philosophy. It's absurdly self-biased.

I don't even remember. Doesn't matter.

No One of the things pickup teaches you is to stop caring what women say about you. It simply does not matter. But you can only learn this lesson the hard way, by going out and getting rejected 1000s of times.

That's questionable in a relationship context. The problem is the ego loves to co-opt spirituality and consciousness for survival. It's a very deceptive and murky process. Is there something like a genuine connection with another human? Yes. But it is wrapped in layers of survival stuff which will always linger. But hey, I'm sick of preaching this stuff. Go contemplate how your dating and relationships truly work for yourselves. If you dare. Consider this: the only reason you guys follow me is because it gives you survival value. As soon as my ability to give you value disappears, you will leave me or hate me. Yet in your minds you don't think of it that way. In your minds you think you really appreciate me for who I am. Of course this is pure fantasy. You don't really care who I am. If I was Hitler, you would want me killed. Such is life. Accept it and move on.

All you have to do to see that your romance is completely self-biased and survival based is to contemplate why you don't get romantic with a gorilla. There is absolutely no reason why you should relate with humans more than gorillas other than survival. Absolutely everything involving sex is pure self-bias. Why do you not hump a light-post? Sex is COMPLETELY arbitrary and relative. And the only reason you do it is because it has survival value for the species. But don't get me wrong. This doesn't mean you can't have deep intimate relationships. You can! Just stop fooling yourself about what it is you're doing. You are using those relationships to enhance your survival. You are doing that without admitting you are doing it. Self-deception 101. Except that's your projection, not anything I said. Relationships are survival. But saying so does not devalue the relationship in any way. It's just being honest about what you're doing. People get the very wrong idea here that I am anti deep relationships. Not at all. You can do deep intimate relationships with consciousness and spiritual aspects. But it's still a survival game. People love the illusion of it not being a game. It makes the ego feel justified in its raw survival. The ego needs to paint a pretty story about how all of its purely arbitrary survival needs and manipulations are in fact legit, pure, good, honest, truthful, and selfless. Women especially fall into this illusion and they really upset when it is pointed out them. Both men and women are selfish as devils when it comes to sex. The selfishness is asymmetrical, with each side denying their own particular brand of selfishness while being outraged by the selfishness of the opposite side. And all of this is, of course, just more selfishness! And all of this is, of course, denied with great passion and fury. It would be much simpler if you just came out and said: "I am a selfish devil and I want sex under conditions X, Y, Z because that's what serves me best." But of course you cannot do that because it harms your survival. Your community will judge you for it and you can't stomach admitting to yourself just how selfish you are. So you must keep all your true motivations and conditions secret, even from yourself.

Careful, not all dicks who mistreat women are PUAs. That's a very problematic conflation. Ordinary guys mistreat more women than all the PUAs in the world. Guys with poor dating and poor social skills are not angels. They creep women out big-time. Let's not pretend that a non-PUA will not manipulate women. He certainly will, just with less skill.

@The0Self If you work in a women's department store, that's like doing pickup 8 hours per day. That's like shooting fish in a barrel. The perfect cover to ply your art. Many people get laid from their jobs, simply by having the right jobs which offer automatic socialization opportunities. And of course they use this to their advantage to snipe the best targets. This is like a socially acceptable form of pickup.

That's precisely how ignorance works. An ignorant person feels he has the whole world figured out. Hence the tragedy of it. Which is why I said a conspirscy theory is a dumb person's idea of intelligence. Analogous to how Trump is a poor person's idea of a rich person. They don't know what genuine wealth or strength looks like.

Lol You have a naive understanding of how politics works. When you are leading a giant nation, all sorts of evils will happen and mistakes will be made. Have you considered how many people would have been killed without the drone strikes? What the alternatives to drone strikes are? See, when you sit at home and judge others, that's easy. When you are put in charge of the world's largest military and tasked to defend Americans, that's a whole new ballgame. Don't forget, they will replace you with someone more bloodthirsty if you don't make them feel defended. The rules for world leaders are not the same rules as middle school. Death is baked into every decision you make at that scale. A naive stage Green does not appreciate such politcal complexities. It just wants peace to magically happen. This is the biggest problem with progressives. They act like all this is so easy, and then of course they complain and pout when they can barely win power in a real world election. Much easier to be right in your own head vs making things happen in a world full of selfish devils who want to eat you alive. Obama is a butcher compared to a middle school teacher. But that is the wrong comparison.

They don't all explain the same thing. It's hard to know. Takes a higher intuition. I can't really explain it.

Lol Well, as long as you got the results you want, what else matters, eh? You got one slippery ego-mind You have no idea the depth of my female-male relationships. If you assume they are shallow, that's your mistake.

The truth is that your romantic love is utterly self-biased and designed to serve your ego's survival needs. Please stop with the BS. You playing games.

They don't necessarily want the children. They just got nothing to live for but sex and drugs. Very underdeveloped humans behave like animals. You can't reason with them.

Keep that crazy in the closet till you got him hooked

If it was so easy, we would have done it a long time ago. It's a super complex political and systemic issue. It's not simply a matter of food delivery. Many people in poverty have serious mental health issues. How you gonna magically solve that? You give them food, they will sell it to buy crack. You give them food, a local warlord will bully it away from them to sell. Delivering free food to many of the worst countries is impossible because local dictators, mafias, and warlords will not allow it.

Or how about be of some service to mankind and earn some coin? This idea that money is evil while begging for food is noble is absurd and needs to be jettisoned. It certainly does not work in modern develop countries. Maybe it worked 2000 years ago.

I guess you'll have to find someone else to verbally abuse you. Or maybe just learn to learn without the abuse

People will naturally want to gossip about anything of this subject matter.

It will be a delicate balancing act. I'm not making these changes to attract more viewers, but to give the work a higher caliber image for existing and future viewers. In the past I didn't think the image of the work mattered so much, but now I realize that casual attitude cannot hold up in the future as we grow. It needs to feel more professional. I think I can tone it down without losing the directness, honesty, and in-your-faceness. I want to be direct without being offensive or obnoxious, which I sometimes come off as. It will take me some practice to find the right balance. It should be subtle.

@Ineffable Not many.