Hyper Normalisation.

[Breakingthewall]

On 24/10/2026 at 11:20 AM, Sugarcoat said:

Yea I know what someone says is one thing and the presence is another and both matter. Being enlightened doesn't automatically make you be able to be the most effective teacher for the largest audience, it's also about how developed they are on human level, it's not like enlightenment unlocks all human potential just because there's no ego in the way. Also different speaking styles fit different people, so they can have very niche audience, some like more poetic some like more direct. I suspect maybe some enlightened people don't have intense presence, maybe they have instead still and quite empty presence. It depends on person, two people who are enlightened won't be the same, speak the same, have the same presence etc. 

Enlightenment is being open to the total light that reality is, to the boundless absolute that it is. It is impossible to communicate; it is life in its totality, yet it is not a "thing" or a "someone", it is the complete absence of boundaries. I have such moments occasionally, but most of the time I don’t, nor do I want to. There is human work to be done, a human life to unfold and express. Why? I don’t know; that’s just how it presents itself.

 there are people who are in totally open state all time? Maybe those yogis, it's a possibility, then maybe they have a special presence, and if you are interacting with them you get some inspiration, they drag you to the openess 

 

Edited 10 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[Breakingthewall]

On 24/10/2026 at 7:46 AM, Mellowmarsh said:

No one knows this.

 

The reading of words written , the listening of words spoken, are just words being read, written nor spoken by no one.
No one is indifferent. No one is not indifferent. No one is the universe. No one is not the universe.

 

No word is this OR every word is this.
No one is writing, no one is speaking, no one is listening, there’s just EMPTY reading.

 

 

Thoughts are schematic structures to describe the reality. Thoughts are the reality itself in the form of a thought but some are true, other false. 

One true: reality is

One false: self is an illusion. 

Why the first one is true? Because avoid any contradictions, any falsehood. 

Why the second one is false? Because it's contradictory. Affirming that self is an illusion implies categorising the self as illusory Vs real, but this implies that this categorization is real, being this categorization an structure that happens in the self. 

Do you see the difference?

Edited 17 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[Mellowmarsh]

Yes, I see the difference, but the difference doesn’t change anything, as a finite character, my personal sandcastle will not last beyond the death of the unstoppable sun. “Split the atom's heart, and lo! Within it thou wilt find a sun"

 Here, there is a difference where there is none. See!