my fat greek wednaz'ing of dialect, disorder and desiderium (very long, part i)

[kavaris]

Onoma, Names, words, those are important fragments... that i should've considered starting w/ in this intro, that is by making 'em indigenous to this introduction.

That is, again, to denote the identification on the nature of words, of wisdom, and its significance to this journey. It remains immanent, for we do eventually cross through that realm in a broadened way of sorts.

Being and Becoming are like frameworks that describe actions of the microcosm, going towards the Absolute, One, I mean, its that keyword Being that describes it, not really Absolute, since its only ever an idea of the Absolute. The words Absolute and Being are very close together, and the whole idea is that we are the experience that exists in the in-betweeness, the istemi towards  that misunderstanding OR understanding, the freewill, independent choice to choose a macrocosmic perspective, existence as God, or Absolute Oneness, which again, it implies Being, as One, not just an idea that you have up until the point of dying, For no one shall be One in death, and THE End, Rather the misunderstanding continues in death, to life, to death again.

Thats not where it ends or begins. There is no beginning or end, its only freewill, its only ever direction, its only ever reassurance or perspectives, differences we create as our default mode; Energy we feel inside, as the inner pyr, that gyrates and creates more and more energy. Thats when we are propelled forward into, into the paradox of life, And to untangle it all is to experience some truth that we call "our reason for it"

What is our justification for what we are doing? Everyone has atleast one thread of DnA shared w/ the ultimate — in the dragoon blood sailing experience, everyones scales evolved from the primordial egg, and,

If we are anything like them primordial beasts, we are still flying around aarth, as the beasts that are to give rise to human speech and beliefs, grounded in the magick of wind and words, song and birds.

Theres nothing you we can ultimately surrender to, or belong to, Theres are only thoughts, ideas and words that we can use to ground the very thing *in between,* Theres only justification, that is, actions, Justice, in the primordial sense of energy and focus, Artistic renders of who we are, who we once were.

It is only a small part of Ousia, As Being is a universal blooming of sorts.

Zesty is the contrast of the cold damp metallic railing touched!... As we walk along the steps towards a secret woodland entrance, and yet, it is only the beginning. 

Malachi's last message, an accidental forewarning, an *unfollowing* that marked an unbroken following, a beginning that exits — belief, itself  — a religion without doctrine. What is it?

We anticipate, we foresee, pillars cut through, our mind evolves. And as our sense of wants and desires are greeted w/ an unimaginable beauty, so too are the past experiences gone and forgotten truly, hence they never existed to begin w/ The Ultimate, the Absolute, truth, it requires no 'one single experience or idea, cause the truth is that which you've already set your heart towards, And you need only fuel the inner fire towards that wide-eyed revelation onward, towards that accented blossom that tells the rest of the story/or in avidya, to ignore the stories and scenes you've already been made present within, Life, Death, Life, Truth, Dionysus

my fat greek wednaz'ing of dialect, disorder and desiderium (very long, part ii)
Ὁ υἱός · ἀέρας · ἀνὴρ κεραυνοῦ

Chaos of exp., staggered, drunk, unfortunate, funked, sucked, alternating happenings, a cascade towards a place thats not-so-good (so is life, for everyone)

Gracious is the Name and shamanic faces we can share and possess too.

And thats ALL (the "all", defined as, "closer", "towards")

We dont exist in the purely felt affectation, not entirely so, but we do however possess an ability to define it, describe it, and create a world that makes such a thing a reality, assuming that is what it takes to do so. We need-only use the creator's belief, or the felt-separator, otherwise we strive As the felt-unifier, back to closeness-to-affectation

Allow me to paint the picture of this fairytale, as that is the layer where dragonflies come to greet you and say "Hi". Its the layer of the castle that you live in, that you think [from] per the echo temple, per the conscious field of wants and desires, the desire to be here or there, the desire to be this or that, as well as Dante's Desire, an earthly, poetic, center of gyrating vision, for much like Beatrice, desire is more than a beloved of course. So Desire itself is the burning steps that walk ever closer towards curiosity.

To be, to create, to imagine, is to be made of some sortve goo, It's at the edge of our most certain self, whom we imagine as \*based in truth. That is to say, that its an unrevealed truth that we sense, etymological feelings that guides... that point us towards this wholly felt, embodied realm or dimension, the Name, the Being, the experience.

Onoma, Names, words can have *essence,* or they can be relocated through an *etymological* essence, which is not the origin but the truth, or the meaning that gives rise to a truth.

That is, in describing truth, we are talking about the location of meaning, which could be experienced at some other time, in some other sequence and circumstance (another day, tomorrow, et caetera)

Our sense of belief denotes a longer term relationship w/ meaning, of which shall fall downstream, As we just *say* what we think, when its really our thoughts swimming, continuing on to place what actually lives downstream.

In other words, that very seed image or initial thought, its something that exists downstream, in regards to 'how we should interpret its meaning, or just how we think about its meaning, and how it applies, retrospectively.

So when we speak of the Absolute as an idea, we are referring to a *spiral of differences* wrapping in on itself, in a front-facing way that we perceive as "actions, events, et caetera", though that isnt the final story, for we are that Directionality, trying to "tune, tweak" it [ourselves] to fit the story, experience, as it is, as it exists right now

Being, or the act of, and understanding, at some point, they are almost indistinguishable, for you cannot do one without the other. It might seem like its more of a spectrum, where it falls explicitly on one or the other, but they are indistinguishable from your own point of view / It speaks to this understanding of Unity, One, Nous, etc.

Being or Self is a unifying principle of multiplicity, basically, and its prior to the "path", towards an otherwise dualistic expression of, "As/In Waking Dreams, that which pass through the gate of ivory and deceive — those through the gate of horn accomplish or bring to pass an etymological feeling or truth (what is real)" of that which we are then to inactivate, motionless experience, diverging from that participation in consciousness, \*as the source itself, as unconsciousness (see also, high does of Ketamine or experiences like this...)

What is consciousness? Consciousness is akin to an affectation of intelligence, levels of, constantly tweaked to the perceivers standpoint. The perceiver, the whole of affectation, it is they who take on the qualitative experience as part of a synthesis of intelligence. And at that doorstep, we are to return to the point of sentience (new modes on the other side)

Being, Ousia is the ultimate perceiver and invoker of ["all", possibility] as a meadow, a frolicking field of intellect mediated through "Us", Being, or the quality of, through which we are part of that intellectual introspect., a perspective we take on, that we grant ourselves in the form of thoughts, actions, qualities, etc., We give ourselves that constant update, or we simply *do what it is we need to,* It's all intertwined at / around the edge of contemplation *(... as a product of what occurs when similitude links form to participation... which, im not sure we wanna get into all of that)*

That is the twizzlering of Self as it attempts to *know (to be),* to experience self whilst being itself (LsD A + LsD B, interwoven) wherein the way you talk of Self, changes how you think about experience, and vice versa (\* two aspects, that *can* come together, that *can* give rise to, and within the context that should deliberately validate or invalidate their participation), for it is to portray (μιμεῖσθαι) what is, 'dragoon DnA sailing; DnA strands that are both metaphoric and literal, emerging (or descending) back to the primordial goo, Of course...

... when i say *emerge,* i mean this cyclical apóspasma, a "sipping of the sea", retrospectively, something that is only a material thought through Self participation. And, only a fragment of what *truly is* is leftover, especially because it exists at the edge of "experience"

(i.e., exp., as, if we are to view it as "a temporary instance of our microcosmic understanding of the world and ourselves"), an exp., that we are to **activate** after experiencing the temporary, but ever-present, \*macrocosmic perspective and understanding of ourselves and experience

Being emerges, and exists as a hierarchical recipe of Being, Experience and God, in the imaginary sense, and from here does it act, as the witnessing of said tiny, flowing circle of "sea-like dream", where the secret sea is a circle within a circle (or a circle around a circle), *era-la-gre'en,* moving out, external, the other, simply "in internal". Per usual is the truth that we tell ourselves, and that activates the path. It necessitates truth in that way, otherwise we cannot place any meaningful thing as distinct and on its own.

The same is true in the opposite direction, to become One, it necessitates truth As the One, otherwise we cannot place any meaningful no-thing, or otherwise ultimate indistinction, to escape what we refer to as an identity / identification.

The Soul/Psyche, the Mind, the Body and experience is always changing. We think we are in a constant routine of some sort, but its in flux, twisted up. We cannot know how it all works, since that is what gives credence to the limitations and distinctions of experience.

That sense of "not knowing" acts as "everything that can happen, that we dont have the means of happening". Like, in a dream, the unaware factors act as part of a limiter to what you can see, believe or experience. We are the unification of knowing and not knowing, in that way.

THAT is the fairytale. But once you realize "Oh shyt, im in a fairytale", you come to accept the situation for what it is, cause it requires limitation, it requires distinctions and separation from what is "a higher truth" (intimate is its attainment)

Truth in the Absolute sense is something that should present itself (χρὴ αὐτὸ ἑαυτὸ φανερῶσαι) on the macrocosmic scale.

Last part

We need not continue towards a conscious cosmic truth. We need not become God if we fear God itself., God as an idea of the Absolute, God as part inner pyr, part luck, chance or happenstance, for no such hands may extend, If/assuming our fuel is made empty, beyond our grounding, our understanding of said potential energy, cause then what would be left? We cannot so simply exceed our potential in this moment of doubtful precedence, when we've not yet made it a liminal field of spontaneous energy.

Pleasure is of the highest concern when you're spirit has been drained, hence the uptake and downtake of pleasure towards the highest version of Self
Pleasure is of course not the same as engagement and overabundance and consumption for consumption's sake. Pleasure in a real way is closer to Awareness

And in another way, it is directly connected to non-rigidity, an artistic way of thinking, i.e., the opposite of what's called "menticide" or "killing of the mind", though that must be tempered by some predisposition w/ the usual, step-by-step regimen of life, "what is seen to be the case" -beyond that, is what must be made quiet, a melody related to extraneous introversion, or what Minds of rigidity would see as extraneous thoughts and ideas, but what introverts would view as "the core of innovation" -The End

Edited 4 hours ago by kavaris