You cannot know Awareness

[oOo]

@Mellowmarsh maybe thats just how it is for u

Tho for me sometimes when I checkout this forum I dont feel myself becoming more enlightened but less. My awareness has changed.

Not structurally, at least not yet perhaps we will come up with an internet brain rot meme, if used too often, but functionally. Just as if I am shown a scary image followed by w happy image or vice versa. All unexpectedly.

That is actually thr most fascinating fMRI experiment

best wishes 

[Mellowmarsh]

7 minutes ago, oOo said:

i am not going to try convince u. U seem locked in ur frame.

Do you honestly think I have a need to be convinced of what I already understand.

I only know my own mind and how it works, no one will convince me otherwise of what I already know. 
There is only my frame here that I have to refer to. I’m not someone else, and nobody else is me.

[oOo]

@Mellowmarsh in generality u r irrefutably. Incorrect.

Inside ur own world, u r undeniably "frame/praise worthy"

As I said. It's fine. Believe wat u want. We dont have to continue, in fact I would prefer if we didnt.

Because u r just here to tell everyone what u have already figured out about what is personal for u, which is fine, not if u want to extend the conversation to either an ontological or scientific generality 

Take care

[Mellowmarsh]

1 minute ago, oOo said:

@Mellowmarsh in generality u r irrefutably. Incorrect.

Inside ur own world, u r undeniably "frame/praise worthy"

As I said. It's fine. Believe wat u want. We dont have to continue, in fact I would prefer if we didnt.

Because u r just here to tell everyone what u have already figured out about what is personal for u, which is fine, not if u want to extend the conversation to either an ontological or scientific generality 

Take care

Believe or not, I’m here for my own entertainment purposes only. I’m completely self loving and completely selfish to the core.

Byeee, and thanks for swinging by with your opinion which you are entitled to have, of course. I’m in no frame of mind to deny you your own truth.

[oOo]

@Mellowmarsh 

I would not comment here if I was here purely for my "own truth."

That would make me as equally selfish as you have claimed yourself to be. Detailing at least implicitly how you were here just to waste, in this case, my time before I decided to comment, would have been appreciated. 

I clearly stated I was looking to observe and support discussion on an ontological to scientific reality. That is not "my own truth".

Please choose to avoid mentioning my name directly or indirectly before mischaracterising me again.

That is my personal boundary, and that is the second/third boundary broken. Thank you.

Edited 1 hour ago by oOo

[Mellowmarsh]

1 minute ago, oOo said:

@Mellowmarsh I would not comment here if I was here purely for my "own truth."

That would make me as equally selfish as you have claimed yourself to be. Detailing at least implcitly how you were here just to waste, in this case, my time before I decided to comment, would have been appreciated. 

I clearly stated I was looking to observe and support discussion on an ontological to scientific reality. 

Please choose to avoid mentioning my name before mischaracterising me again.

That is my personal boundary, and that is the second boundary broken. Thank you.

Good for you.

 

Good luck finding a sparring partner to discuss ontological to scientific reality. But discussing BS is not my style.

[oOo]

@Mellowmarsh this is now the fourth boundary broken.

If there is bullshit, state it, or respect my stance as I have respected your own sovereignty accordingly. 

You have shifted from ignorance to denial to frame control and now disrespect because u feel cornered when if u were just cool with things, u would have just had interesting questions that led this conversation somewhere

As stated and I quote:

"avoid mentioning my name directly or indirectly before mischaracterising me again."

 

Read your own signature, thats where I got the inspiration.

 

 

 

 

That said.

 

Very politely now.

 

Fuck off.

 

Do not mention my name or refer to me in any way shape or form again. Thank you.

 

 

 

[Mellowmarsh]

4 minutes ago, oOo said:

@Mellowmarsh this is now the fourth boundary broken.

If there is bullshit, state it, or respect my stance as I have respected your own sovereignty accordingly. 

You have shifted from ignorance to denial to frame control and now disrespect because u feel cornered when if u were just cool with things, u would have just had interesting questions that led this conversation somewhere

As stated and I quote:

"avoid mentioning my name directly or indirectly before mischaracterising me again."

 

Read your own signature, thats where I got the inspiration.

 

 

 

 

That said.

 

Very politely now.

 

Fuck off.

 

Do not mention my name or refer to me in any way shape or form again. Thank you.

 

 

 

Believe wat u want. We dont have to continue, in fact I would prefer if we didnt.

[oOo]

 

And now u r directly quoting me as a part of some strange ego game u have going in ur own imagination

 

43 minutes ago, oOo said:

@Mellowmarsh in generality u r irrefutably. Incorrect.

Inside ur own world, u r undeniably "frame/praise worthy"

As I said. It's fine. Believe wat u want. We dont have to continue, in fact I would prefer if we didnt.

Because u r just here to tell everyone what u have already figured out about what is personal for u, which is fine, not if u want to extend the conversation to either an ontological or scientific generality 

Take care

 

 

12 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Believe wat u want. We dont have to continue, in fact I would prefer if we didnt.

Thats now the 5th.

Though my mistake, I mistook you for someone that was at least 18 years of age.

My bad. 

Observations made. Points taken. Will just scroll right past you next time. 

Done.