Math, Science and Systems Designs has a related concept

[kavaris]

Math, science and technology have a similar, but differing way of evolving over time—and more and more the way we design systems has this notion of splitting everything into like, these individual components or commands in order to generalize/abstract the system—being that its incomprehensible nature leads to it being harder to work on without; Similarly, and increasingly, science and math have these notions too, like where you can choose to elaborate further at all of the points where it seems fit to do so. Although, its not always necessary, or right, to elaborate in such a way where it turns every point of understanding into an interfacing component—and it comes down to the lexicon-ographer, or whoevers in-charge (whomever has the most insight, holding the most pieces in their head at once) to make a refined decision about "how those *points of unknown* should be further interfaced with/or not"—and so, it is somewhat up to everyone to assume this role, that is, everyone who is in a position/viewport into that area of study, or that system. Nevertheless, when deciding on when it is right or not, there is a methodical way to go through all the material, such that you can begin checking off those boxes, and speaking up. Putting that aside, i think its always better to elect someone w/ the designated role of making those decisions, or passing it down to someone else, like a team mate. Anyway, the bottomline is that, i feel we are finding ourselves in a position where we are depending on someone to be insightful enough to make those decisions, but because the cities are all skyscrapers so-to-speak, we have to make sure its being designed from its foundation-from first principles. If your lexiconographer (im just calling it that for now) isnt so use to building everything from the foundation, then youve got the wrong person. p.s.its more useful if others specialize as the Historian, or the Inventor/Engineer, etc., in order to expand the amount of special insight into whatever area is being focused on, and then the Project Leader/lexicongrapher makes the bigpicture decisions. Anyway, thats getting off track, as i just meant to bring up the ever increasing likeness between math, science and technology, and the increasing need for organized teams that are comfortable with electing a leader. Things start to become aimless without an elected leader, wouldnt yous agree? Just to put it in perspective, even in families, the male is sortve the unofficial leader of the household, even if its never verbally communicated. Its just a role that happens naturally~if its about working on a project, then you need some form of a leader, especially as every male on the team is just gonna assume "well, im obviously the leader here", because no one has said otherwise...

Edited June 25 by kavaris

[kavaris]

https://youtu.be/wdIUzxWYl8c?si=z2PeDqsgT-gN7Wyk