Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
kavaris

Syzygy and the Centre Fugue

1 post in this topic

Posted (edited)

I get to consciousness at some point in this, so bare w/ me...

This word (syzygy) is so interesting, because in the act of using it to describe an opposite, its also doing so as if to mean "at the point, or union of..", or that is, theres an implied meaning that comes with it when used in this way, e.g. "Had we found a way to syzygy the current placement of SubjectA in our list of priorities—in conjunction w/ SubjectZ that's down at the bottom—we might have returned to using SubjectZ more often in our daily lives/ experiments."

Therefore it encompasses both the meaning of opposites, and *union of* at the same time, thus, itself means the opposite of what it could mean (such is the shape of multiple things in orbit—when they are both in union and not in union together...)

Anything with multiple dimensions to it, or anything with our 3-dimension is cascading around, in an eternal exchange with extra terrestrial forces.

but really are dimensions like 1-plane, 2-plane, 4-plane etc. real or are they just conceptual? this leads me to a new point, or question everyone should ask theirselves, and that is, "What is this a pointer to? Doesnt that point to a 'reality' that supercedes conceptual space? And if what matters is the relationship we share to our own reality, then what field would help us to understand this relationship?"

In other words, you wouldnt try to understand a language that exists conceptually onward would you?... Would it then be about introspecting and approaching our condition from the perspective of a story, a kindve epic that curates itself, circulates, and solves its own problems by identifying which directions do — or dont go in the right direction; Doesnt our language do that? Doesnt our connection to the universe do that?

If we imagine language like a song language, or a poem that maps to a song, you see how this natural language becomes more than language, but like doorways into the conscious self, and from multiple angles which are sometimes accidental as we accidentally stumble onto new connections, new ways of understanding what has been the same thing (consciousness) for allalong.

Think of how much we are misunderstanding because've how we have been tirelessly trying to work around the edges of conceptual space—as we might consider "our current progress on Earth" as being purely *"edge work"*, work that lives out in the decimal points with very little—flat, and not enough interesting things —atleast not without having actually gone to explore the centre fugue, seeing what could be—at the heart of it. The end. Thank you, and have a good day.

Edited by kavaris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0