Search the Community

Did you learn this line of engagement in your temple? Does basic adult nay human engagement offend you? Where did you gather that I was referring to dating? Oh, but your temple told you this, since we all have to look up to you "as better". when spiritual teachings mention the opposite looool.

I don't see what's amusing. Maybe medical ethics are a sin in your culture. As is being insecure. As in having atrocious English and then getting offended when others call you out for the same. And going to a temple, thjt tells you "rules" that you cannot be judged, ever. why not? Tell me then where this special "rule" from fluff emanates from.

Some youtube gurus, who probably don't practice what they preach? people have beliefs. some are good, others are bad. it's what it is. Some sheltered and spoilt Buddhist-esque guru should step out of their temple or see the wider world. or not be blinded and hypocritical. For instance, in many societies, bigotry is accepted. This is why in much of Asia and Africa, there is extreme anti-LGBT sentiment. Humanity isn't perfect. we can strive for betterment, of course. However, it doesn't mean we cannot see things for what they are. To change anything acknowledges seeing the reality. I dont' like fake and blinded people. I'm not such. I say and see things as I genuinely see them. These YouTubers are disingenuous and blinded.

Did I offend you? looool. I guess some temple-inpsired "morals" are key here. We're not all that. just the human way.

Pretty women can't manage - i had two pretty bosses who were by far the worst. One acted like i was bothering her merely when I asked for assistance, the other in a performance appraisal spent the time mocking my character. Pretty women have forever literally just walked into me in the street or uni or anywhere. they literally think they own the place. They've knocked food out of my hand at fast food places, made me drop books in libraries, poked me in the temple and eyes with their umbrellas whilst raining, and then they get "annoyed" or "hurt" when they get called out for said conduct. this proves they are SCUM. SCUM assault others for kicks, or make people waste food for nothing since I'm not eating food I bought that's fallen on the ground, and then recklessly commit ASSAULT since they're too dim and retarded to tilt their umbrellas or watch where they are walking. Pretty women scheme and plot, and all because they've been spoilt asf since they were young. that' the formative point, and where this shit all starts. Pretty women are bullies in everyday life. so in the workplace, that gets ramped up TENFOLD!!

Friends don't barrack each other. Also, there is personal autonomy. Maybe in your church or temple, this isn't prescribed, but the works of some 1000 year old guru aren't really paramount to anything bar your congregation. People have prejudices, it's how it is. We don't live in a utopia but we can improve towards better things. If you think that people don't have bad views, and genuinely believe this, then you're either sheltered or aren't as "wise" as your prescribe. Or are dishonest in your condemnation and refutation of prejudice, or openly selective in condemning such.

your temple as a child told you you're "special". lol. it's amusing you cannot handle a different view.

the temple told you you're universally loveable, no matter what you do. lol

As a general rule, people don't care if they annoy you. Though if it's intentional, then yes, one should care. However, you'd cite some 1000-year-old guru's beliefs as gospel and the absolute truth, without realising there are different views in life. And me stating that people don't need to necessarily care about your feeling might trigger you, since your inner ego cannot handle it. I wasn't raised to be fearful of people and most aren't. I'd take the value my parents instilled in me rather than some crap one learnt in a temple based on the seeeminglhy "inviolable" values of said long-dead and retarded guru.

so people have to go through you to act normally? i guess your temple told you all of these "rules". fuck your temple and fuck your rules.

Yes. you find x activity ick. so it's a mental illness. You've proven my point. Projected inner thinking. common sense can be subjective. what is sense to you may not be to others. Your reason like a temple-based person, since you openly project. But then proven psychiatry is false since some online dude's inner beliefs from his based seat of reasoning is all!! Freud is largely discredited as it stands. but then your thoughts are the thoughts!

Is that proven it's a mental illness? or just your temple-inpsired ways promoted into "fact"? There's nothing t accept. though maybe accept thoughts in your brain don't translate to reality

You temple people crease me up. I love these esoteric and mystic "rules" that we have to accept everything you say. and then you speak about how enlightened and kind you are loooool. fools. maybe tell the cute girls who post here saying the biggest and most naive crap out and you give them free passes. all because you want to fuck them. I'm merely using your spiritualism and ego against you.

this is you: - spoilt in a temple - filtered your thoughts and actions - everybody MUST bow down to you fuck you looool.

then i won't stand for it. Keep on with your imaginary rules. which temple pandit or guru told you this? I'm genuinely curious.

I dunno why temple peple assume their views are THE views. and get offended when presented with another view!

the point is your weak understanding of people. and making irrational and baseless points that people cannot stand up to you. i guess tht's how you were raised in your temple.

lol. you're so wise and smart but realise I don't have an interest in engaging with you? Your brain operates in funny ways. I guess it's a temple upbringing. I find lots of temple people are bullies and lack integrity.

Your temple trance is comical. Smiling at others is cringe. I'm sorry I offend you by exercising free will. maybe "force me physically" to accept your view. Mr. "wise and absolutely social". it's not absolutely social to use trances to engage others. humans have free will. you're so wise but it's not even entered your brain "Oh he's not responsive, let me move on!" your parochial Eastern ways aren't universal. Yes, smiling is cringe. if that makes me bad, so be it. i wasn't raised in some rural part of the USA or the Far East. I'd say people have a neutral stance to others. without any real evidence, we don't assume they're hostile or friendly. But find somebody else to lecture to. you can stick by your cultural norms, and I'll stick by mine which are reinforced by other countries in Europe such as Denmark as I stated.

Ah, so you have no children? grand. I said lecture to them. I'm sorry I'm so baaaaad at exercising human free will. Your temple isn't all of life there are different views in life. Some people are vegans, others are Christians, and others are Muslim. You seem to take a thought in your head and have a blanket projection on all. this is problematic as there are different thoughts. And don't say that humans are naturally blanketed. it's not "natural" for me or others I know. We're humans too. Very few actions are truly universal in our species. Not even language, walking, talking, etc. are. Unfortunately, some are born mute or cannot hear, for instance. Spiritual people are cowardly and love to plot. Maybe control your brains to tell ALL what your guru told you. but you won't. Maybe you're in some creepy trance or something. So yes, smiling is cringe.

Because I choose not to smile at them. I have no obligation to do so. I'm not sure what you're trying to convince me of. There also isn't a God, and tell-your kids lectures, not random strangers. People are nice based on humanity. I am such. It's how I was raised. in your temple you were told to impose on others. I wasn't. A person is't bad if they don't adhere to your impositions. That's life. We have smiles to communicate with others, as we do with all facial expressions. I'm nice to people off the bat provided they no reason not to. I don't believe we should be antangonistic for no reason.

Seems you learnt this attitude from your temple. Well nobody has to care about your views. you don't regulate anybody. it's funny how others adhere to that and you don't. people aren't singularly morose. that's a belief you concocted in your head and project like an angsty teenager. you also don't get that your spiritual beliefs don't align with reality. so if you killed your neigbhour's children, would you still expect them to respect you? so according to you, there is never any enmity in life. ever. wow, spoilt and "enlightened". it's you are selective, imposing and angsty over normal human behaviour. maybe if you don't want beef, don't assume that your views must be heeded or taken as primary all the time. i know that your temple as a youth probably hated tact or thought selection, but still. I'm amused me point this out triggers you, since apparently it's never been human to realise we're not owed anything and we all must be viewed positively no matter what. i guess you'll come at me again when I post something not to your subjective liking. I'll make a note not to care and not engage in any "discussions". For a "wise man" your perceptions aren't wise, and they're frankly quite splintered and selectively applied. i guess your temple told you everybody has t fear you...lol. not how most people move, but then yes, your mental constructs "win".

I can take it that I triggered you, since I merely responded to your question with my own views. Am I not permitted to express my views? the values of your temple aren't universal.

meh.. i'm not really bothered. it's clear i triggered you over nothing, and you get to label who has the right to speak freely here because it's how you were raised in your temple.

i know it triggers you. you genuinely think based on your temple upbringing that's how adults interpersonally relate. i just know how your brain works and how to move around it.