Faceless

The trees imply those ?

takes no time Time is the what you want to get rid of in this case. Hehe

@Shakazulu Here is a old video of Allan Watts. Don’t mind the visual quality just listen to what he has to say. To me this is an intelligent way to view life.

@Charlotte ?????? ??

Ego/thought becomes a problem in the psychological realm. But wanting to get rid of ego is a movement of thought/ego. Its not about choosing one side or another, but instead watching the entire movement at play. The approach is the ticket. sign of the holy man/women?

Heheh?

Excellent?

It’s about harmony. Although to me having no head is what life’s all about. I only have a head 40% of the and the other 60% is pure timelessness. ?

@Key Elements This image in relationship applies with nature/environment as well. ?

Figured you would

Kinda.. words and imagination play a part in thought. It’s action without the influence of the mechanical, dualistic, and fragmented movement of thought. So it’s action free of psychological time/thought. It’s not thought then action, but just action. As thought in relationship has no place. Thought is for practical matters. Unconditional love is not when thought is in movement. Thought is a movement of self preservation by its very nature. That’s it’s function.

@Key Elements Sure I do understand... I’m not for running off to a monistary either. It’s not about choosing no self or self preservation as that is setting the very image im talking about. That is still within the field of choice... I am not for or against either direction. I am simply observant of the whole movement thought/self. That’s the point. It’s all about attention without mechanical reaction from thought/self. In this there is no point of view, standpoint, or overall movement of psychological time which likes to choose between the opposites. This is what I call being whole. Intelligent action that is complete. Make sense??

Very ?

Humility is an absolute necessity

It’s rather necessary?

Based off a self imposed image. Self preservation. An example of thought/self in relationship.

Do you see it clearly? Everything I share can be observed in oneself.

@Viking

To impose an image implies that the self becomes all important. And if that is the case there is no communion or meeting one another mutually.

Cool. This kind of understanding leads to actual embodiment in relationship.

It cannot calture the whole, it can help in our attitude towards the whole. ?

Cool!!

I would never never advise anyone to kiss my feet, I haven’t worn shoes since 2006...Hehe?

What do you mean “Short on time”?? ?

Like I said I don’t know QM but I know the limitations of thought. Thought inevitably limits all measurement based studies/investigations such as sciences and so on. Thought specializes only on parts of the whole. But not THE WHOLE.