Faceless

Awareness includes both the dynamic and static. Without awareness their can not be one without the other and vice versa. As in yin yang and so on. Does that make sense?

Yeah belief is a movement of fear. Fear is a movement of thought/time

Getting angry and reacting to being caught in a traffic jam is a movement of time. Hehe And getting angry and reacting verbally to screaming baby is also a movement of time lol

Yeah I see that ? narrowing movement of will/contraction implies a movement of time/thought

@cetus56‘s Portal of light is related to this.

The way I view attention may be different then your meaning. My meaning of attention implies a dynamic movement. Attention in my non experiencing implies total attention without a static interpretation of the perceiver. The way I precieve a static movement would be concentration. As when one uses concentration their is a movement of volition which implies thought ‘time’ If you are going off of dictionary meaning you may associate concentration and attention as the same meaning but different word used. In that case that resonates very well to me?

Where’s @cetus56 on this?

The least amount of words will make this easier to discuss. If you are wondering my responses are so short ? dynamic being new static being old

? So awareness is static as you see it currently? Do you see thought as a static or dynamic movement ? Keep in mind that illusion/dream is static in its very nature. If that makes it clearer.

Sure? but collectively subjective

? But is awareness static or dynamic?

Of time? Sure?

Lol ?

You got everything you need already man?

Hehehe ?

The gift of forgetting

The ultimate model of human knowledge is always finite and static therfore not truth which is dynamic?

@tsuki Yes I noticed our words are different so we would have to confirm what we mean by them. If I were to sit down and take more time writing this It might be a little clearer but not much. My son demands to much attention so I am limited on how much ‘time’ I can spend getting into it..... Distinctions are the result of time itself. Words are the result of time ‘thought’..So in order to communicate the movement of time is necessary. Words can not capture anything that isn’t time bound such as the timeless. I have simply to the best of my ability tried to communicate that which can not be communicated? The absolute most efficient way to communicate this is not to say anything? Does that post I wrote present any confusion that I could undress? If so give me one at a time. That’s how I like to communicate.

We are using words to communicate so distinctions are necessary. But in the actual experiential part distinctions are not necessary. As their are none ? And it may be a philosophy to you. To me this is a fact. I live it?

???

One thing that helps is identifying movements of time. So when they arise you can be aware of such movements.?

To end time actually then the timeless is. To understand the timeless, time must be understood very deeply. If time is not understood and observed in oneself then it will continue to inslave the center. We have see the whole of this movement and end it all at once. Unless this happenes one can not ‘understand’ that which is timeless. To embody timelessness their will be no recollection what so ever. Their will be no distinctions made between one thing and another. Their will be no reference points any longer. At this point experience doesn’t even exist. When the known is not, their will no longer be any point of view.

@pluto haha ?