Carl-Richard

I don't know what the highest attainment is, but I know there is something there worth pursuing. I also prefer to call it mysticism.

For LaMDA, it was speech. It says a lot of things without understanding it. It's a parrot. Can you eat it?

No I'm not?

You're assuming the embodied state is the same thing as the glimpse.

You should actually listen to your ego. It's trying to tell you something. What are you lacking? Fix it and your ego will shut up about it.

How can you be this tight?! 21:00 - 24:19

Bruh, first I gotta learn to handle my sober state lol

I have experienced psychedelics, but not 300 times up my ass

Flaunting or not, Leo says you have to do a ton of psychedelics to understand what he means by God-realization. I haven't done much of that, and I don't doubt that doing psychedelics at that scale will crack your head open in some way or another. I just don't know exactly how. I can tell you a lot about meditation, but not about that.

I mean, I haven't experienced that much psychedelics.

I wouldn't claim to know what Leo's idea of God-realization actually is.

I've never laughed so hard at a joke.

What goes?

What product?

I'm just saying how it is. If your source of comprehension of reality mainly comes from a drug experience which severely alters your state, then of course how you feel in your baseline state is not as relevant.

Only if you rely on drugs. If I feel like shit, my engagement with reality will be colored by that. Pain literally contracts your focus.

Leo "Have you tried 5-MeO-DMT?" Gura ?

Do the girl method. Save it for the weekend and make it special. Light some candles ?

A.I does not move like a duck or swim like a duck. It only quacks like a duck. It's a parrot.

Is it generated by the brain, or is it the result of being a living creature who grew up in a physical environment with nurturing parents and adequate food intake? Because wherever you can point to a normally functioning human consciousness, the latter is the case. In other words, we have no conclusive evidence of a human experience without a human body.

No he does not ? It's a joke.

Ñóőôb

What you're really asking for is whether A.I. has thoughts, feelings and emotions like humans. That's like asking if a rubber duck has the same internal organs as a live duck. A.I. emulates certain very surface level aspects of human behavior, just like the rubber duck emulates the physical appearance of a duck. The full human experience is entangled in a complex system of biological and social structures with evolutionary and ontogenetic developmental processes. Coding some instructions into silicon is not that.

The Top Ge

I'm an old man, jk. I mean, we did have CD players back then, but when you have something like children's music on cassette, you use that instead of re-buying it in a new format.