Carl-Richard

Moderator
  • Content count

    14,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Carl-Richard

  1. But it did talk about illegal substances.
  2. One time I asked it which steroids strongmen tend to use during competition, and it answered "sorry, I can't give information about illegal substances". Then I followed it up by asking "which receptor systems does cocaine worked on?", and it started listing off all the answers. Yes, the thing is not logically consistent, and it's clumsy, but you don't have to necessarily attribute it to political bias. Sometimes all it takes is a different prompt.
  3. @zurew There is of course some overlap between language and thinking in terms of appearances, but it can still just be drawing upon previous texts that happened to talk about deductive logic and spit out the right words. It doesn't require an abstract understanding of deductive logic, i.e. thinking.
  4. @Topspin715 I'm saying you can have an Orange understanding of something in terms of practicality even when you're capable of something higher, and if you're in that camp when it comes to SD (which I believe most people actually are), this advice is for you.
  5. One big downside is the danger of false information. These machines literally don't know what they're doing, and I've already been fed misinformation multiple times. Like some AI expert I forgot the name of said, ChatGPT is closer to the autocorrect on your phone than a thinking being capable of reasoning. It has simply been fed a huge database of text material and then learns how words are usually strung together, and then it predicts which words tend to come next in a given prompt. It's nothing like the process of thinking, so trusting your thinking mind on it is a gamble.
  6. You can prove anything using Hancock's methodology of spinning narratives on top of ancients myths from all across the globe.
  7. There exists other ways of coping with your emotions than cockblocking your fucking friend lol
  8. @ZGROPIUS I see. The crop was very confusing.
  9. @ZGROPIUS Can I ask what your profile picture is? I don't know what I'm looking at ?
  10. @integral He has to be told that he is in the wrong at some point. That could've happened in that very conversation had they talked it out more.
  11. What if he does it again? Every time they go out?
  12. "Sorry dude, you can't come on the night out dude, you're too histrionic"? ? The guy was in the wrong. He should acknowledge that and get over it.
  13. Bruh, what kind of long-term would he be getting with these histrionic cockblocks?
  14. This thread just turned full BDSM Maybe chill a little bit.
  15. True. So you agree with me that calling awakening solipsism is unneccessary and confusing?
  16. If you want to see the differences between INTJ and INTP in action, watch the debate between Daniel Haqiqatjou and Destiny on Andrew Tate's human trafficking charges (when it comes out, or try to find a clip channel). You can see that Daniel is so deeply immersed in all these surrounding narratives; about Islam, about Julian Assange, the international role of the US in stopping sex trafficking, US standards of due process, Tate's rape charges, the child porn scandal of PornHub, etc.; that he fails to spot the very obvious error in logic he is making. He is essentially drawing on all these disparate external examples, weaves them into a narrative, and says "isn't that evidence enough that we should doubt the legitimacy of the arrest?", while Destiny tries to bring it back to "but do you have any evidence about this specific case?", or "so again, I'm here to talk about Tate's sex trafficking charges in Romania, not [...]". That is Te vs. Ti for you. It's the difference between building a mostly empirical case vs. a mostly rational case, and in this case, the mostly empirical case is way too indiscriminate and imprecise imo (hence, Destiny refers to it as a "conspiracy theory"). Had the empirical case been less driven by personal affiliations and more grounded in the specific case, maybe it would've turned out different, but if we grant the internal workings of MBTI, that is usually not the case (TeFi do be like that).
  17. The thing about that movie was not how scary it was per se, but how it made me feel mentally unstable. I've never had that with a movie before. That said, I haven't watched that many movies in general.
  18. You should really watch it then. I've never been so disturbed by a movie before. I thought it was just a fun movie about girls going on an expedition ?
  19. When I close my eyes, it might take some time, but I'll literally disappear. Does that not happen to you?
  20. The song that made me get into death metal:
  21. What happens when you close your eyes?
  22. Annihilation. Nothing comes close to the psychedelic horror in that movie.
  23. When you sit down to meditate, what happens?