Sandroew

@LordFall Glad we reached an agreement. Keep doing you.

@LordFall I literally prefaced my post with that im not interested in debating. I wasnt actually triggered you know. Figure of speech and all that. I based my opinion about you not being open minded on multiple posts of yours. I read quite a bit from you lately. You are clearly and intelligent guy and im clearly not good at not sounding condescending. Now you are dreaming about humiliating me on instagram because i called you out ? Check your ego bro.

Well, now im triggered and so even if im not interested in debating (one day i wont be useless i swear), i’ll call you out because you are wrong on so many levels. Thats definitely not accurate, even if i want to be optimistic its 30% blue, 40% orange and 30% green. Its not easy to estimate, because if you remember its not that a person is overwhelmingly one color, its always a mixture. If you want to look at political parties the greens and the “extreme leftists” are nowhere near close to be half of the population. If you want to look at corporations, they have nearly zero green values. If you want to look at capital owners, its older people which are over represented with blue people. When Leo came out with Spiral Dynamics he said nearly half the population was blue ( 40 to 50 %) which he based on the real data that was gathered during the study. Some time has passed since then, but its very safe to say the world wouldnt look like this if nearly half the population were green. You probably mean that stage green has a shadow if orange was not properly integrated, but thats just false representation. You do understand that every stage has a healthy version thats superior to the stages before it, right? When i read this i felt like your understanding of SD is skewed and partial. You definitely didnt do research on that and thats okay. We are not writing research papers here. But i would just generally advise you to keep an open mind instead of being so self assured all the time. Confidence is good, but dont be a fool.

If its an emotion regulation problem its better to work on that if possible rather than exercising willpower to the limit and beyond. I mean doing both works. You know what i mean.

I feel like i heard so many insane stories from Sadhguru over the years, he turned into the grandpa that tells amusing lies to his grandchildren. My own grandpa was full of it. ”Back in my day it was so cold in winter the wienerdogs snapped in half trying to get around the corner”

Ahahaha. He is funny as fuck

Oh man you beat me to it. Eminem is my all time favorite music artist by the way. The movie was great.

20 vs 1 debate videos and similar formats. They scream 0% productivity and 100% ego to me. LoOk aT mE iM sMaRtEr ThAn AlL oF yOu CoMbInEd!!!4!!

Maybe you guys thought i was just merely clowning OP, but i really think there is wisdom in what he said, even if i did a piss poor job at explaining it. I was trying trying to link an Alan Watts video for you guys, but apparently everything is getting deleted now thats not by the official channel. It would be such a shame if someone had entire lecture series and more downloaded already.

Are you telling me to stop milking it?

I dont want to put words in OPs mouth but he probably means something like Not every person experiences life primarily through thought. That doesnt mean they are less spiritual or intelligent. Descartes must have been miserable. Life isnt serious. Yes, there is tremendous improvement possible to ones life through philosophy, but understanding itself makes zero practical difference. Truth for truths sake isnt for everyone. I feel like i still didnt put it perfectly into words what my understanding is of OP’s shitty topic. But i feel like this is the beginning of a mooovement. (Bowel) A 7. point for the sake of 6 7

Jokes aside, i understand what you mean. It has an underlying kernel of truth in it.

He was the worst Joker too. By far.

Noted.

@Joshe i think you formulated it pretty clearly. I also think you are not giving a fair chance for the possibility that UFOs could be on Earth. At any rate - and this is no offence to your person - im not willing to invest energy in arguing this time. (gotta try to catch some sleep)

The test says im 0% capitalism. LOL Its not the greatest test anyway, but just to be clear im not against capitalism. It has a place and function.

Apparently i didnt post it the first time. Im pretty sure it was mostly similar than what i got this time.

I disagree with this. If the most accuate conclusion is that you dont know, then thats it. You are falsely conflating the application of science to a practical problem with UFOs.

Im not trying to shoot down your plan, i love devising them just like you did here. But i also think that we dont need to solve these problems by ourselves. There are tons of expert and academics who could work out the details based on real data and basically i could just say science. The problem is that society isnt there yet to even think about it. Whats more important for me to focus on your topic is the realization that housing shouldnt be treated as a commodity, but as a basic human right. But then that opens the conversation to endless complexity. I would love discussing it, but i would have to fire my brain up to it first!

Who remembers when Musk claimed only the Nazi party can save Germany, because they were the only ones willing to benefit his business. Gotta be one of the top 10 Musk moments. On second thought its probably not even close to make the top 10. Great guy though!

Bro claimed Bob Lazar was an MK Ultra subject.

I just watched The Devils Advocate again recently. Its one of my favorite movies. Did you guys know that Cullen's home is actually Trump's penthouse in New York ?

@Joshe That looks badass indeed

@PenguinPablo Thank you!

I swear yall overestimate the difficulty of math. Sure rocket science might not be the best example, but you dont have to be a genius to do introduction level calculus.