SOUL

I understand with such clarity it's obvious you feigning cognitive dissonance is so transparent. The projection of criticism and antagonism or just your 'headless' attempt at deflection. At least at least try to stay 'true' to your beliefs and stop acting from self centered 'feelings'. HHaha

You played yourself, it wasn't criticism, it's observation but if you feel criticized by it then you may want to examine your own self. Ah... there it is.... keep a foot in "reality", huh? What is the point of blocking out life? Blocking out your family? It's you who believes this "headless" state has value, there is no authority or objective measure to suggest that it is truth, right, better, enlightenment or anything other than your preference, it's just the way you choose to believe. Some might even say it's the opposite of being present, that it's being absent in going from the zombie hypnosis of self consumed to the zombie hypnosis of headless escapism isn't an example of being awakened and awareness of presence in reality. You are welcome to believe anyway you wish to and I won't call it "false" but when you are calling the way others live 'false' you are just living a belief paradigm of your own dogma with judgement, not free from judgement of "centerlessness". This is the clarity of simple observation....if you feel criticized by it then ask "who" is it that is getting criticized? Baha

Oh, so your authoritative assumption is for "only the known of the false".....well I must admit this is a unique claim but that implies you know truth to distinguish it. Alhough, even if you wantl to say you only know false it's just according tp your perception so to use absolute terms is an assumption from your own belief paradigm.

There you are still saying what it is or is not as if you have some authoritative view of it. Then trying to obscure your authoritative assumptions by saying you have to see it for yourself. Well I do have a clarity that allows me to see right through any assumptions of absolute truth and when you climb that mountain you'll understand.

@Shin I was just sharing my experience on laughing too much on this forum...hehe

Well, I cannot enlighten you to it, you will have to discover it for yourself. HAHA

I agree, it is a joke, that's why I laugh so often on this forum. HAHA

I have been criticized for laughing on this forum so be aware that some will question your motives for laughing. Apparently a sense of humor is only funny when it's them ridiculing others with false narratives they make up in their head.

Oh... so that's the only thing you've said this whole "post enlightenment observations" thread? It's been you only repeating "think for yourself" over and over in various ways? My apologies...

You were sharing a warning about false myths of enlightenment and I was wondering what those were since you felt it important enough to mention it. It appears you like to share lots of definitive sounding statements using absolute terms and when questioned about what you've shared you then "share" we need to figure it our for our self. Maybe you should start with figure it our for yourself and stay with that because all the definitive statements using absolute terms may be found to be false myths, no?

I thought you said you were going to deal with it? I guess you may want to examine yourself more closely.

Bahahahahahaaaaa!

Well, thanks for sharing yours, too.

If it's not serious then I have to wonder why warn others about false myths? That's who I was asking initially about it even though you felt it was serious enough to ask me why so serious. If you have a problem with me asking of others who warn about false myths and speak authoritatively about it then you might as well deal with that, too.

What if it's not liberation from the self and you are pointing them in the wrong direction? What if it is cultivation of thought so your words saying isn't not could be seen as false myth? If you claim you aren't a teacher why are you telling people what it is and what it is not if it is something that cannot be taught? Why all the pointing if it could be misdirecting to others?

@Shanmugam It doesn't surprise me that you suddenly appear to defend the teaching by people when it's usefulness is questioned by others.

What if someone disagrees with it? What if those observations are not a guide but leading them away and not something they realize because they see it differently? What if they see that the journey doesn't end? Are you comfortable that you may be misleading others by your teaching? Why are you saying all these things in authoritative words and tones if there is no authority to establish it? If all paths lead to enlightenment then there is no "false myth" and what you find "faster" may actually be "slower" to another and you could be slowing them by teaching what you do.

If people "can't learn" from another teacher why are you making definitive statements with words like only, can't and never? How do you know it is true for everyone because if you "can't learn" from another then you can't possibly teach either, then why make those statements? Someone may find true for themselves that freedom comes from chaos and order is authority so limits freedom. If you suggest people need to be free from what others have said why do you say so much in authoritative sounding words? Why use words like can't, only, must, not and always at all? If any statement seen as true by one be seen as false by another is there even any false myth? If there is then again I ask how is this determined? Find out yourself sounds nice but what if they find that everything you are teaching is false can they call you a false myth teacher then?

Is there something wrong with "measure"? You measure that "any designated path by past knowledge and it's descriptions of what 'enlightenment' is a myth". Does that mean Buddha's words are false enlightenment myth since it's past knowledge and description but you saying this now isn't? You measure to "never accept any authority, especially the self/thought", that "where there is authority freedom is not" and that "order only comes from freedom". You speak as if you are the authority on these measures but should I not accept them since they are coming from your authority of past knowledge and descriptions so are 'false myths'? I'm genuinely concerned that people will fall into these false myths of enlightenment you seem to think are important enough to mention. How can we know what these false myths are? What are they? Clarify so everyone will not be deluded by these false myths of enlightenment!

What are these "false myths of 'enlightenment"? On who's authority that determines what's "false"? What is this "order" and on who's authority is it determined?

@cetus56 Yup, it sure is playing with something.

@Shanmugam Well, whatever it is that I said that caused you to reply in such a lengthy and pointed way was not my intention but it still remains that you make many assumptions about me that are mistaken.

It amazes me the mental yoga people go through to make a point that doesn't exist.

@Shanmugam My apologies for triggering such a reaction in you but I assure you the assumptions you make about me are mistaken.

This thread started with an appearance of clarity in awareness, that you were seeing through the house of cards being constructed but now it seems like you are letting yourself get confused by the cards. You are examining every edge and every marking on the cards searching for clues to the reason and meaning of the house. I made aware the esoteric sounding word play and clever circling narratives used in an attempt to distract and that is what happened. You are admittedly just more confused by it all and unfortunately no amount of more word play and circling narratives will untangle the mind from the distraction unless.....you just let it go and let it be.