SOUL

Oh, I thought it was just a joke which would have been fine. Simply put, my point was that any confusion one may have about nonduality stems from the perception of it or what someone is teaching about it. Nonduality doesn't have separation within it, it is the unified in its absolute nature.

I understand that stray 'l' in metanonduality may have caused some confusion, the matter has been resolved and I appreciate your feedback on the matter.

It does come with fries if you get the combo.

That's just a derivative of Egosackly which is just the bag we keep all of our selfness in.

Once one perceives metanonduality it is realized there is no duality in nonduality to be confusing, there's just perception of nonduality that some may confuse as confusion.

Truth is not in words or in concepts imagined Abiding is truth

Although, misdirection is an activity. You asking a loaded question you think you know the answer to is an exercise and then you trying to misdirect that to something else is also an exercise. Of course, you will probably retort with that there is no 'you' that is 'doing' this so exercise the misdirection even more.

The forum littered with your posts, it's evidence of stumbling on the obstacle you created for yourself. An absence of the imagined conditions would be an example of a blank mind because conditions you have created is mind chatter. Suggesting others are bound by the conditions you imagine for yourself and that you are helping them be free from what you are imagining is mind chatter. 'Truth' is not what you say it is, it is true when you abide in it.

...and yet you keep explaining and explaining in thread after thread with post after post. Curious behavior from someone who claims to have a blank mind, no chattering and has no 'you'.

Begging the question is not asking a question, it's a disingenuous exercise in seeking what one thinks they already know. Read the quote in your own signature.

Again, you are not replying to my message, it appears as if you are responding to your own mind thus proving you are still blocked by the obstacle you create for yourself.

Of course, you cannot see any other way, it's what you have created for yourself and placed in the way. It's a self fulfilling prophesy, since you have envisioned the obstacle and constructed it. If you had not, it would not and then you could see another way.

How is this a response to my message? Please clarify. It would serve no benefit in pointing to all the other activity in the mind that exists in addition to chattering.

If you imagine 'must' then 'must' it is for you but don't project your 'must' on some imagined others, let go of the musty....or not, you can stay musty.

If someone creates a condition for 'x' to be...whatever it is you prefer to call that 'x', enlightenment or awakening or liberation or god realization or whatever, then it is you who puts that condition between it. It isn't there if you don't create that separation from it. So if it's mind chatter or emotions or ego or suffering or whatever one would say is the condition that keeps them from it, is what keeps them from it. Without placing that condition in the way it isn't in the way, it doesn't serve as the obstacle that separates. It is also the same with suggesting there is only one way or some specific circumstances to be it, then it is the one who believes it is this thing then it is them who has that which they created for themselves. Not anyone else though, to say it is this way for me so it is for you is creating imagined obstacles for others. Someone might say to me aren't you creating that condition for others? I'm not creating the condition for others to abide by, I'm just pointing at the presence or absence of them.

I have had many wonderful interactions with people through being genuinely kind and 'nice', even with women and some of them included physical interactions. Could it be that you aren't really a kind person but only are pretending to be one to get something from others. Just a possibility, I guess.

Well, that's what happens when one gets heated and friction causes heat.

So you are pissed in your pool? Hm... still doesn't exclude you from being peaced in your pool, though.

Bringing clarity to contention is like pouring clear water into a muddy pool, it doesn't make the pool clear and only serves to muddy what is poured into it. The way to clear the pool is to abide in stillness and the pool eventually clears.

Um...about that.

I, for one, welcome the digital deities when they take over the world.

People often confuse 'simple' with 'stupid' as if having an uncluttered and uncomplicated mental life means you're uneducated, ignorant or unintelligent. You know what is cluttered and complicated? This forum and the endless contention and fretting about complex abstractions. There's no authority to suggest it's required, truth or better. You know what is simple? Just being present. There are no complicated rationalizations or explanations required for just being present. People often confuse 'happy' as something which can be satisfied through conditions. If I just get this or do that, accomplish this or have it arranged like that...THEN I'll be happy. Whether it's spirituality or materialistic, both are conditional that people use to get 'happiness', which is really just a mood that is then ruled by conditions that can be disrupted by them. So it doesn't matter how simple or complex those conditions are if we base one's happiness on it that can be prevented or destroyed by them. To abide in a sense of well being with the effects of contentment, fulfillment, joy and love that comes with it so it is not disturbed or disrupted we can just be it unconditionally, not base it on conditions.

Beware the Obsequious AI Assistant AI is being coded to flatter you, and that should make you suspicious.

You just make up some random sentence and think it proves something? Useless words. I didn't explain nothing? Yes, I didn't explain nothing, that is accurate. Although, I actually did explain something when I wrote this I quote below from a previous post of mine but in your reply to me about this post you cut it out and didn't address it at all. It shows quite a bit about your mindset. True and false are relative dualism and if you are getting into the mind trickery of trying to think we can sort the illusion into two piles, one true and another false you have gotten lost in the sauce. Absolute truth isn't an exercise is sorting illusion, it's transcending illusion. If you continue to focus on true and false and who has what ideas all you are doing is reinforcing your attachment to the illusion. See, I didn't say you were wrong or it is false to do this, I just explained the influence of doing it. It is a trap to believe our own bullshit too deeply. It's all story telling we do to contextualize our journey. The map is not the territory and the path is not the journey. The irony of awakening is that there is no journey and nowhere to go. Explaining the joke is like trying to describe enlightenment. Words are not suitable to convey it, only the realization of it in awareness does it become clear.

There is no you to be here so there is no you to leave...or something