Scholar

You will never able to capture infinity. Your very existence is infinity capturing you.

It's one way of looking at existence that way. But all the sets of problems that you are trying to solve are emergent in the first place. There is a complex web of forms of existence which then result in the solution that could be described as existing with the least amount of friction, in a conceptual sense, within the emergent environment. Ideation of symoblism, externality, subjectivity and eternity are all emergent. There are infinite possible expressions. In other words, you are not truly construct aware. If you knew, you'd realize how profoundly infinite existence is. It is indescribable, and it is infinitely describable, and it is neither. The problems that you are so immersed in are a fabrication, the entire framing of what is perceived as existence is a fabrication, a result of dynamics that build upon each other, as they self-express themselves. And even this is one more way of reality self-asserting itself. Existence can assert itself so profoundly boundlessly that it becomes meaningless to attempt to capture it. And furthermore, it is so profoundly boundless that it becomes meaningful to attempt to capture it.

All motions are an act of self-affirmation in this sense. All forms of existence are simply the assertion of it's own existence. This is simply one way to look at existence, but it's still a construct. Remember this will always be circular, in that in the end you ground the idea of the self-affirmation of existence as a result of the idea of the self-affirmation of existence.

Excellent conversation. I hope we'll see something similar when he talks to Leo.

This isn't even funny. Is this really all the effort he puts into his comedy? Puerto Rico is a island of garbage? Latino's have lots of babies? It honestly doesn't surprise me. I see the same, vile dehumanization on the part of progressives. It's just more obvious to see with the republicans because of how much more primitive they are. This is what our species is right now, and it's a sad look.

We know this is not true though. Democracies are far more stable than pretty much any other political system. Mob rule is avoided through constitutions. There are limitations to democracies, but the limitations of dictatorships are simply far greater and lead to far greater risks. Even if you have a philosopher king, it is a matter of time before someone takes their place who is not interested in representing the will of the people. You also underestimate how impossible it is for a singular individual to actually get an accurate and unbiased grasp of what is good for the people. Just the presence of an unaccountable monopoly of power can turn the entire society into a system in which the most powerful individuals strive to take that position. Given that the most powerful individuals can exert most pressure on the system, they can position themselves such that they will end up being the "philosopher king". This is what you observe in these types of systems.

Only sub-90 IQ people would ever care whether or not someone is a cuck.

When I search this the first video I get is the podcast.

I'm just saying, the types of people who have been the most rational and contributing intellectually to society were not the typical high testosterone men. In fact, most of them were probably rather low testosterone men. Look at people like Abraham Lincoln, Albert Einstein, Leonardo Davinci, Isaac Newton, or various other philosophers, great politicians and scientists. In the vast majority of cases these are what you would describe as low testosterone men. I would say there is an inverse relation to high testosterone and reason.

But someone being more masculine makes them more irrational, not more rational. Hyper-masculine baffoons are not the ones who invented pretty much anything ever in the history of science. They didn't lead nations into progress and greater sophistication. Masculinity in excess is the very problem this planet has, it is the epitome of irrationality and idiocy. Women don't behave even close to as idiotic as testosterone filled men do. Women also excel at science and academia. Women also are better at leading, because they are not as much driven by irrational competition. That's why the most socially intelligent animals in the world are lead by females, like whales and elephants.

You were suggesting that Spiritual Warfare was making a good point about Destiny in regards to his femininity, on the basis of the testosterone he has in his body. Destiny is in no way feminine though, especially not in regards to the topic at hand, namely his reasoning and personality traits. It's absurd to think this is a meaningful point.

Destiny is one of the most autistically rational people you will find on the internet, he is incredible aggressive and dominant. The idea that lower testosterone would make him more feminine and therefore irrational is blatantly absurd.

How are we the same species.

You're genuinely irrational, and I don't mean that as an insult. I have noticed this with some of your others posts.

@Spiritual Warfare Just to be clear, you want these guys to walking into women's restrooms: And you want this person to walk into a male restroom:

You just said that didn't matter. And so is intersex, it is objectively biologically true. I think Leo made a video about Construct Awareness. You should watch it, it might help you with this.

So why should we have gendered toilets?

So abolish gendered toilets. Women don't deserve special treatment.

So why does it matter that different sexes exist? You are making no sense to me.

Research intersex.

What do you mean they existed first? That's not how equality works. Intersex people always existed. You said that we should not care about trans people and various other minorities feeling safe and accepted, that they don't deserve special treatment.

Doesn't matter. You said nobody should be given special treatment, but heteronormative individuals are getting special treatment by having gendered toilets. What about intersex individuals? If every sex should get a toilet, intersex individuals should get one too. Otherwise this is just a farce to justify majority domination.

Then you should be for abolishing gendered restrooms.

I don't see any misunderstanding, I think you simply are not aware that the principles you aspouse directly contradict some of the conclusions you draw from them.

People always use predators to justify their existing predispositions towards a certain marginalized groups. We did the same to race, homosexuals and now the same occurs with trans people and individuals who engage in consensual incest. You can even see this occuring in relation to animal rights, where various forms of animal rights (like banning slaughtering and enslaving of animals) are made out to threaten social order. A conservative is like someone who sees the invention of cars as a threat. "People will die in accidents if we allow people to drive such machines!" But the conservative does not see that there are solutions to the problem that will mitigate such risks without hindering progress, namely the invention of traffic laws and safe car designs. The conservative is primarily interested in maintaining the world view and cultural context which he is comfortable with.