Salvijus

Sometimes it is your own reactions that change how you feel. And sometimes it has nothing to do with you at all. It is those moments where your energy changes without you having nothing to do with it, that I consider evidence for Indra’s net. I know the counter argument would be. But it's all happening inside one bubble. One dreamer. Yes. But regardless it places you in a position of being a single entity among many where you're not the only influence and simultaneously it places you in a position as a Source of The Dream. Making solipsism and individuality both true at the same time.

The moment you see another point in space and time having influence over your experience, it makes you equal to them. So you both become equal in the ability to create. So one end of the snake cannot be more real than the other end of the snake. Then it becomes clear that every head comes from the same source sharing equal sentience and power to create. That your head is not the end of all things.

It just means interconnectedness and interdependence. If a presence of another being can influence how you feel, that's evidence for Indra’s net. Even if you call it imaginary.

Indra’s net is true tho. Even if it's imaginery. Implications of it don't change.

The evidence of Indra’s net is easy to prove whenever your state of conciousness gets influenced by the presence of another being. And the moment Indra’s net is proved. The rest of what I said or what Bashar and every other major religion has said gets proved automatically.

The moment you accept the idea of Indra’s net, even if it's imaginery. It automatically implies there being multiple heads that are interdependent and interconnected. And Indra being the god. The maker of all heads. And it automatically places you in a position of a single head(soul) among many rather than a single concious sentient being in existence.

This is way Jesus would say, "I and my Father are one" rather than "I am God" . Because each head of the snake is one with the Source. It originates from the Source and technically Snake(God) alone exists. But at the same time each head(soul) is but a child of God. Some heads(souls) have more access to the Source than the others. But no head(soul) can ever encompass the Source entirely. That's why you can awaken into God conciousness deeper and deeper forever and never come to the end of it. "I am God" is only half the truth. A more complete truth is "I am a son of God, through which God is experiencing himself" and there are infinite other souls through which God is experiencing himself. Making solipsism and individuality both true at the same time.

It's not about escaping solipsism. It's about realizing solipsism is but half the truth. Like this picture is not a correct understanding of solipsism. The tail should have a concious experience just like the head. Both heads are a creation of the Body of God (the snake) . And reality would be this Body of God with infinite heads, all of them having a concious experience but all of them originate from the same Source. This way solipsism and individuality join together as one without any contradictions.

Thank you for this

Maybe the choice was easier if you were to set your values straight.

Bruh, you should be in marketing business, haha. I watched Russell Brand video tho. It was really good.

Ok

Could you recollect any specific example where I did these things?

I probably have few comments left until the daily limit of comments turns on that exists on this forum. I'm going to try to guess your perception of me. Arrogant. "who the hell does he think he is?!!?! " "how dare he speak like he's above us on a high horse" And then out of that energy comes labels like. Deluded. Blind. Not aware. Brainwashed etc. That's would be my intuition of what you're tying to point out. @puporing At the moment I have nothing to say. Tcare.

Bruh. What are you fighting for even at this point?

Mhm. I think we are both guilty of that. Plus you made a cheeky comment about me. You should've expected a reply I think I think i understand what you're trying to point out in me.

Yes. Shakti is good word for it imo.

Truth is not always polite, sorrreyyy That's not how it works.

You fail to understand that every heart is the same. You're not doing anything different than me by trying to call me out. Except that you're doing it out of frustration. And I do it out of heart's calling.

Be more clear then.

That's actually a compliment in selflessness. Thank you.

I see you.

When sexual energy is in the genitals. It's called Kundalini. When sexual energy rises to higher centers into the heart it becomes love. But it's the same energy. Tho it feels very differently. All energy is sexual energy actually. Just takes different forms. This video probably talks about what I just said.

I would say this. There's nobody who is not a savior and there is nobody who does not have the light of christ. It's just that some have more of it and some have less of it and accordingly your capacity to make difference is made. But we are all the same here. So welcome to the club guys.

It's nice you of you guys that you're trying to make me see my flaws tho. I appreciate it. It's very christian of you to do that.