Salvijus

You can make your will manifest to certain extent. But because there are parts of the reality that your will has no influence over, it shows you're not the ultimate maker. God is the ultimate maker, and he manifests a portion of his will through you. And other parts of his will through other life forms.

If reality was a product of your imagination, you'd be able to imagine things as per your will. Since you can't, it proves you're not the sole maker of the dream.

You experience a taste of infinity. Not the end of infinity. Infinity is evermore greater than any taste of infinity you have right now or ever will have.

All experience is magnificent in itself, but no experience is the end of God's greatness.

It means controlling a dream like a lucid dream.

Your experience is a taste of the absolute, not the end of the absolute. If you think there's nothing more to God than your puny experience, then you embarrassingly underestimated infinity.

You can prove that your will is not ultimate. The fact you can't bend reality at your will is the proof you're not the sole maker of the dream.

Ramana is saying to treat others as yourself. If you can only treat with yourself, then you can only treat with sentience, since you're a sentience itself. That's where solipsism crumbles. Solipsism believes only you're sentient and everything else is the projection of your subconscious mind. Nonduality means the mind of God is playing all the characters all at once. Solipsism implies there is only one perspective called "your puny life". Whereas nonduality implies there are infinite perspectives and you are all of them all at once. Same infinite conciousness experiencing itself from infinite angles. Solipsism implies your will is the ultimate will (yet they self evidently can't control anything). Nonduality implies God's will controls everything, a portion of that will is manifesting through you and other portions of that same will is expressing through other life forms. In the end it's just one will like there is just one hand but that one will has many fingers. Each finger has its own function. Whereas solipsism believes a finger is in control of the universe, even tho it's self evidently not true, yet they will continue to cling to that position despite all the evidence.

Questioner: How should you treat others? Ramana: there are no others, there is only yourself. Implication: everything is part of the same One Sentient Self. Conclusion: solipsism is bs.

Maybe everyone is on the spectrum. 0.01% of autism is not a big deal.

Flat earth is undiniable.

Maybe there's a more mellow version of the enlightenment story out there. Magdalene standing on a snake. Symbolizing transcendence. Kundalini snake = penis.

Lol, I'm laughing through tears aswell.

The story of enlightenment in a nutshell.

"When you're concious, love rules you. When you're unconcious, dick rules you." Maybe that's a better translation.

In English it would be: "Don't be a dick"

They value their limited experience so much, I'm surprised they are not flat earthers.

"Asha said: I have heretofore said: That that speaketh to my heart, what is it? Now according to thy wisdom, that that speaketh to my heart is I'hua'Mazda? How shall one know it to be so! Zarathustra said: If a man ask the All Light in reference to his own affairs, and for his own concerns, then receiveth he an answer from the tetracts; but if he ask the All Light in reference to what he shall do for others, to render the highest good unto them, then is the answer from I'hua'Mazda. I declare unto thee, O Asha, he is a dark man indeed to whom the Creator speaketh not every day."

Lol. I bet if Leo changed his mind about solipsism, all the solipsism defenders on this forum would change their position in a blink of an eye. Just like the 2019 comment section - all were echoing Leo about solipsism being a dumb postion.

Awakening is not going to solve any of that. Focus on mastering living in alignment with grace instead. Graceful living will lead to continues rise in conciousness. Enjoy the ride.

It's one viewer, infinite screens. A screen is just one eye of God to observe itself. God has infinite eyes.

That's where infinite screens come observed by the same conciousness.

That's cool. <3

The quickest way to find the most mistaken one is to look for someone with a smirk of conceit.

And every mystic that ever lived*