Salvijus

Jesus christ. In case you've missed it here it is again. In your direct experience your will is not ultimate, therefor you're not the sole maker of reality. Ggwp. Solipsism debunked.

I wasn't trying to adress what you were saying. I was giving you an argument why solipsism is bs.

The reality where everyone shares the same conciousness and where God's will is manifesting in everything and everyone, if that is your definition of solipsism, then I have no problem with that. I'm not sure you can still call a reality like that solipsism tho. It's true from one perspective, but it is lacking the relative perspective. The word solipsism alone fails to describe reality in its fullness imo.

Said a person who doesn't understand what will is. You really paid alot attention to what makes your experience indeed 👍

Just imagine a lucid dream where you can do whatever. It means you could control the universe like you can control the fingers on your hand.

It's your direct experience that your will is not ultimate. The following conclusion comes naturally after that.

Mm, more likely God is going to individuate itself infinitely more and more. So I don't see it ending.

Yes, and that places you in a position where you're no longer the sole maker of the universe. You're just a finger expression of infinity. And there are infinite fingers just like you.

The fact that you can't control reality to your will entirely shows that you're not the only manifestation of God's will. You're just a part of God. That automatically implies God is manifesting his will through other parts of himself aswell. Like a hand with multiple fingers. Therein is solipsism debunked.

You can make your will manifest to certain extent. But because there are parts of the reality that your will has no influence over, it shows you're not the ultimate maker. God is the ultimate maker, and he manifests a portion of his will through you. And other parts of his will through other life forms.

If reality was a product of your imagination, you'd be able to imagine things as per your will. Since you can't, it proves you're not the sole maker of the dream.

You experience a taste of infinity. Not the end of infinity. Infinity is evermore greater than any taste of infinity you have right now or ever will have.

All experience is magnificent in itself, but no experience is the end of God's greatness.

It means controlling a dream like a lucid dream.

Your experience is a taste of the absolute, not the end of the absolute. If you think there's nothing more to God than your puny experience, then you embarrassingly underestimated infinity.

You can prove that your will is not ultimate. The fact you can't bend reality at your will is the proof you're not the sole maker of the dream.

Ramana is saying to treat others as yourself. If you can only treat with yourself, then you can only treat with sentience, since you're a sentience itself. That's where solipsism crumbles. Solipsism believes only you're sentient and everything else is the projection of your subconscious mind. Nonduality means the mind of God is playing all the characters all at once. Solipsism implies there is only one perspective called "your puny life". Whereas nonduality implies there are infinite perspectives and you are all of them all at once. Same infinite conciousness experiencing itself from infinite angles. Solipsism implies your will is the ultimate will (yet they self evidently can't control anything). Nonduality implies God's will controls everything, a portion of that will is manifesting through you and other portions of that same will is expressing through other life forms. In the end it's just one will like there is just one hand but that one will has many fingers. Each finger has its own function. Whereas solipsism believes a finger is in control of the universe, even tho it's self evidently not true, yet they will continue to cling to that position despite all the evidence.

Questioner: How should you treat others? Ramana: there are no others, there is only yourself. Implication: everything is part of the same One Sentient Self. Conclusion: solipsism is bs.

Maybe everyone is on the spectrum. 0.01% of autism is not a big deal.

Flat earth is undiniable.

Maybe there's a more mellow version of the enlightenment story out there. Magdalene standing on a snake. Symbolizing transcendence. Kundalini snake = penis.

Lol, I'm laughing through tears aswell.

The story of enlightenment in a nutshell.

"When you're concious, love rules you. When you're unconcious, dick rules you." Maybe that's a better translation.

In English it would be: "Don't be a dick"