Salvijus

These days every health question I have I just go to chatgpt. The feedback I was able to get so far is extremely satisfactory. It's amazing.

Not sure about twin flames but I do believe in God arranged relationships. If you're in tune with your heart, it will lead you to the right people, not just the romantic relationships but of every kind. It could be the right group of people "accidentally" meeting and they are perfect for the project you're working on. It happens all the time. If God sees you need a relationship to fulfill your life's purpose, he will give you one. Look at Stephen Hawking

That's a good argument. Solipsism limits God to one perspective in which God is having a taste of himself. As if God wouldn't be capable of having infinite perspectives of himself all at once. Even your your tongue has more taste buds than one. God is not shy when it comes to experiencing itself. He will use infinite angels to know himself rather than just one.

If you're right, it still doesn't disprove that your will is not ultimate and implications remain the same.

❤️ Was nice talking to you.

@Nemra Is this the counter argument of yours? Whether or not experience is imaginary, it's a fact that your will is not ultimate. Therefor, the implications remain the same - you're not the sole maker of the show. See? You being right or wrong is irrelevant

Everything that expresses the will of god also contains the spark of God's conciousness because those two things always go together. Because your will is not ultimate, it proves God's will is manifesting through other forms aswell. It automatically proves that they have a spark of conciousness aswell. That proves that experience exists outside of yours. There. Mic drop.

But you made not a single counter argument to my argument. So you can't say that.

Okay one more. How is it relevant when despite you being right or wrong my argument still invalidates solipsism?

Okay I give up. I'm tired of this.

It's a big if. Whereas my position is undeniable. It automatically implies the will of god is manifesting through many more forms than just you. And that is a valid argument against solipsism.

I don't need to counter what is irrelevant.

You made not a single counter argument against the will argument. As long as it stands, solipsism is debunked as it directly disables any notion of you being a sole maker of the show which is the definition of solipsism. Everything else is irrelevant.

This thread should go to mental asylum maybe, lol.

But you have no counter argument against my will example. So as long as that stands, it is a yes.

You're both the Whole and an individuated part at the same time. And there are infinite individuated parts. And that's where the word solipsism becomes redundant to describe reality because it misses the relative perspective of reality.

If I'm wrong, then solipsism is still debunked. That's why it's irrelevant.

Whether people have experience or not is irrelevant really. To make the claim that you're the sole maker of the show you need to have full control of the show. Unless you have that, you can't claim solipsism to yourself. Lack of control is what proves that you're just a piece in a game not the maker of it. And with that goes down the solipsism.

I don’t assume to be finite. I assume being part of infinity. Where a certain amount of God's will is manifesting through this form. Every part is one with infinity. And also individuated at the same time.

There is only one show but because you're not in control of that show, it means you're just a small manifestation inside that show rather than a sole maker of it.

I don’t need to prove a finite self. I need to prove that an infinite self has individuated itself like a hand with fingers. Each finger being a manifestation of God's hand that performs a certain will of god. Once you realize a single finger is not in charge of everything but all fingers of God combined together are in charge of everything. That places you in a position of a single manifestation of God rather than the center of the show. That debunks solipsisms.

It's not a leap of faith, it's a natural conclusion. Once you realize things are behaving indipendantly from your will, that proves you're not the maker of the show. If you were the maker of the show, you could control reality like a lucid dream but x infinity times more crazier than that. Now you can only conclude to be a small manifestation of God's will only, and that too proves there must be other parts out there. Again a counter argument against solipsism.

I saw this in another thread. This is not true. The individuated part of conciousness that you are right now was never in full control of creation. So when that part dissolves in infinite, the rest of creation continues.

I'm real also. Even tho saying that doesn't necessarily prove anything, I felt like saying it anyways.

Jesus christ. In case you've missed it here it is again. In your direct experience your will is not ultimate, therefor you're not the sole maker of reality. Ggwp. Solipsism debunked.