Hatfort

Yeah, if we flipped what happened into a leftist being in Kirk's place, the same things would be happening on the other side, and they would be equally wrong. The whole right would be blamed, like the whole left is being blamed now, and that would be wrong, at least as far as we don't know that this guy was part of any organization, and acted on his own, if we take that premise as the correct one. There would be people celebrating it online, and it would be wrong. If you celebrate someone who had so much following being shot, what do you expect? This kind of behavior has to be denounced from the left now, when it happens is when you gotta do it. Charlie Kirk didn't deserve to die like this, and I didn't like him, neither his fundamentalist ideas. Has to be also said that it's not the same the responsibility of political figures than to random TikTokers, and I'm talking especially about Trump now, the president no less. A good leader would try to build bridges, not to fuel the fire of hate, which is what he is doing. This being said, the facts of the event are not clear yet, and the information made public by the FBI has flaws. It's insane that the autopsy has not been released and verified to stop the speculations about the bullets, vests, and holes. Instead we got an informal report about miracles and magic. As previous times, I'm sharing videos that I think offer at least good images or and analysis to understand what happened, whatever it was. The next one has very good aereal images of the Campus and the different shooting lines. And apparently, they've cemented the area where it happened. The tent was standing on grass, now it's cement and bricks, according to this guy, that's what the students are saying, and it can be compared in the images too. Another big anomaly, added to the list.

Valhalla has released another video analyzing the new video images that have emerged.

Man, the autopsy with the miracle talk and Kirk saving lives with his healthy neck is a shame. That autopsy should reveal the type of bullet, the direction it had, where it was, just beneath the skin is not accurate enough, all our body is covered in skin, if he was wearing a protective vest, people guessing online about his t-shirt vest or nipple marks is not serious. This autopsy report doesn't hold any scientific standard, and doesn't answer many important questions, the US is a joke country. It's okay to doubt about FBI's version, they just said that there's nothing to look into about the Epstein case, although we know tens of victims have denounced what they lived. Let's not pretend they are safeguards of justice and truth either, they have a bloody history of coups, assassinations, and deceptions. What they've released about Kirk's case creates legit questions. For example, the still images of him that they released the day after were actually video camera images, so we should be able to see if he has a rifle in his pants if we saw the video in motion. The camera that got him getting down the roof had the shooting position too, just releasing a few seconds earlier footage, we would have seen the shot. The chats are strange for two 20-year-olds, and way too convenient for the investigation, as it's been said a thousand times. What are the times of those chats? I found this video interesting.

Well, I don't think it's a closed case, and the FBI's story has holes. Here is a video that suggests that the bullet entered from the back, and the neck one would be the exit, and the location of the shooter. I edit to add another video for the same theory.

The voting is valid, it's just that the voting system is very convenient for Israel, as it's only possible to vote in their favor, and susceptible to astroturfing campaigns with that possibility of voting twenty times each person, and maybe even more, according to the video, people did it. But you could say, people can vote twenty times for the other side too. The problem is there is no Palestine to vote for, or if you wanted to show just opposition to Israel, you would have to choose between tens of other countries, so it's diluted. Before 2024, I think Israel had kind of an organic voting and participation like the others. I remember Netta, she won with a silly-catchy song like it happens a lot in Eurovision, that was organic. For the betting odds, of course people bet for what they think is likely to happen. People are not stupid, they saw how the voting system worked in the previous year, and that's why they bet for Israel again. The songs themselves were not popular in views on YouTube, but then they got this huge amount of popular votes. People see there's a campaign behind it, Israel needs the PR, invests money in it, and the voting system channels the result too. Then they claim people in Europe support them.

Maybe you can volunteer in helping groups in your area, research if there are. You can take it further and get some education in this kind of social work or counseling about addiction recovery and other issues, if that's your calling. Sometimes going through it yourself is a good starting point for then helping others, and you've got that, but don't dismiss additional education, as said, if you are in a position to get it. Later on, you can run for public office, but for your brief message, I would say you're not there yet, though maybe I'm wrong.

A new video about the Eurovision controversies. Apart from the astroturfing and Israeli government's direct funding for ads and voting campaigns, there's something more about the voting system. Israel wants to show that Europe and the world support them by saying they win the popular votes. But how do they get there? Some people support Israel in what they are doing, and they want to express this by voting. The system allows voting 20 times for a person, and they do. But that's like a voting system that only allows a one-directional vote. Palestine doesn't participate, which would be a way to check if the support for the other side of the conflict is above Israel's. There's no way to vote generically against Israel either, as votes dilute along all the rest of the participating countries. So it's a kind of rigged way of claiming support from other countries, when people are only able to show it one way.

The Global Sumud Flotilla movement continues its road to Gaza by sea, over 40 boats trying to get food and aid to the people in need, pressure the Israeli government, and raise awareness worldwide as much as they can. Greta Thunberg is one of the known figures on board, and I'm not sure, but I think Susan Sarandon joined too, and the Irish actor Liam Cunningham. They'll likely be stopped at some point, but forty boats are more challenging than only one like the last time a few months ago.

Portugal will also recognize the Palestinian state, and it's a right-wing government now, which surprises me that they take this step. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yek72jqk4o Five countries have declared that they won't participate in the Eurovision Song Contest if Israel does, Iceland, Ireland, Slovenia, the Netherlands, and Spain. Some countries have declared that they will, because the Contest is considered an apolitical one, but that argument falls apart as Russia has been banned from participating since its Ukrainian invasion. Some voices ask for bans in sports as well, which has not happened yet. But the roars in the streets are only increasing, the last cycling competition of Spain had to cancel its last race in Madrid, as thousands of people were protesting for what they called the whitewashing of Israel through sports, as one of the teams participating was from Israel. The Palestinian flags were a constant throughout all the competition in all regions, including the Catalonians, the Basque lands, and the pure Spanish ones.

Max Blumenthal's commentary on Dialogue Works.

I gotta link Candace Owens again. A guy enters the crime scene to take the cameras that were hanging on the backside of the tent. It's a fucking crime scene, you are not supposed to touch anything, and even less a camera that may content footage of the crime!! WTF? I'll also link Kyle Kulinsky, Krystal Ball, and Cenk Uygur discussing the case, they comment on the information made public. Also, can't they release the autopsy? Did the bullet stay inside the body, because it didn't seem to get out in any of the images? Did it get stuck in the neck?

Movement? Is it even a movement now? Just an internet fetish that I thought of. But no, 90s kids, young-adults and teenagers during the 2000s, there was nothing like that in or out of the internet, there was nothing remotely like that in the conversations, and neither a word for it, it's new as fuck. There were animal-people cartoons for the 80s kids too. Better or worse, I won't say, but this is very new.

I don't know, this furry thing is quite new. I'm a 90's kid, and there were plenty of cartoons with animal-people too, but I don't think this got to be a thing for anyone in my generation after growing up. It's very weird. Besides, why did they leak this intimate internet fetish information about him? Another video analysis critical of the FBI narrative that I've found.

Candace Owens has leaked a new picture of Tyler Robinson eating ice cream in a local Dairy Queen not far from the campus, taken after the shooting at 18:38. I share her short video because she's the one who got the tip.

It's said that Tyler was in a relationship with his roommate called Lance, who is said to be in early stages of transitioning to female. I haven't seen much evidence about this relationship, apart from the text messages, and none that this roommate was a transgender, but it could be. In this case, as the text messages show, the motivation would be to act against someone who would be spreading hate against trans people and kill him. Although the messages are doubtful for me and many, but it's all we've got. Tyler was not part of any leftist group, neither even online that we know of. Neither any trans activism group, and it would be unfair to put this violent act on any of these groups, or on his trans partner for the matter, as he took this decision on his own. Trans activists advocate for acceptance, never for violent acts like this one. Leftist groups advocate for things like affordable housing, fair wages, and universal healthcare, and not by violent means. The implication should be two. One to tone down a bit the differences, which won't happen. Two to take more gun control measures, because for this to happen the culture of easy access to the weapons was a necessary factor, which won't happen either. There's no way to justify this murder, that should be said clearly. Kirk had his ideas, some could be perceived as hateful, but he had the right to express them, and the right to live, most importantly.

From what I understand, awakening within religion is not impossible, and for some people, it could be the recommended way due to their culture, upbringing, and even personality. I would say historically religious people like priests, monks, nuns, imams, or rabbis have probably been more likely to have awakening experiences than the common people. But a religious awakening would be a framed awakening, influenced and understood from certain perspectives that may not be awaken themselves. For example, there is Saint Teresa, a nun from the Catholic church, who had some kind of mystical experience in which she connected with God, she could only interpret that she had connected with the Christian God, and that's what she said. If that was an awakening moment, which I'm not sure, but from the descriptions, it could have been. So I don't see Islam being that different from other religions in this regard. What I think is that both Jesus and Mohamad had deep enlightening experiences, but they didn't have a global understanding of the world, history and civilizations that we now have, so they framed their awakenings into religions and books. I'm not knowledgeable in the Koran, but I've heard some Muslims say that it's not always clear which parts were the ones that Mohamed took from God, and which came more from himself, his experiences, and context.

A video of the timeline and scrutiny of many of the things that have been said.

The confession texts between the guy and his partner are weird for two reasons, as it's been pointed out online. They are extremely convenient for the FBI, all they needed is written there, and it doesn't sound natural. Can't say anything further than this, but it has to be acknowledged. There's a balance in not being conspiratorial, and swallowing anything that is put in front of our faces.

The devastation in Gaza may be even higher than what's reported. https://www.thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2025/09/12/gaza-death-toll-lancet/

This is from Kirk's YouTube channel, his last interview with Ben Shapiro uploaded a week ago. His turn on Israel was real, he was starting to be more critical about it, and drawing a line between America and Israel. He asked Shapiro questions about the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and the limits of journalism in America when talking about Israel. This doesn't mean Israel is behind his death, the evidence now points that it was the lone wolf Tyler Robinson who did it.

At this point, with all the information we've got, it seems clear that it was this Tyler Robinson, who acted like a lone wolf. For those who say he wasn't carrying a rifle in the roof footage, look again. He rests it for a bit on the roof before the jump, then again in the middle, and he is holding it when he hits the floor, his hands are not free. The analysis of the movement of the body and head after the shot, which says that it was from somewhere else, I don't think that's clear enough. The text messages that have been made public are pretty much a confession. The boy wasn't really that involved in politics, neither in the left nor the right. He seems like a normal guy mostly, but obviously what he did was not. How did he get to the point of thinking it was? The gun culture he absorbed since childhood, and access to it that day was a factor, no doubt. I think there needs to be more pedagogy on human rights everywhere, with the right to live on top. Apart from more gun control.

@Socrates I'll add this to your compilation.

For start there's more evidence pointing to the fact that Tyler Robinson was a rightwing Groyper than a leftist. The inscriptions of the bullets are video game references that he used to play online. His family is all MAGA right-wing, and there are pictures of him dressed as Pepe the frog or himself on Trump. About leftists debating, Hasan Piker was scheduled to debate Charlie Kirk in a few days I think this month, that won't happen obviously. Destiny has been a debate-lord for ages. Cenk Uygur and Sam Seder have recently debated several right-wingers simultaneously in Jubilee. Many leftists have been on Morgan Pierce's shitty debate program, including the mentioned Piker and Uygur, and also Ana Kasparian, Owen Jones, and many other lesser-known, debating about the Palestinian conflict mostly. So it's not like you paint it at all. What progressive leftists don't have is right-wing organizations funded by kleptocratic litch corporations pouring money into them like Charlie Kirk had for all his career, and others like Shapiro, Crowder, or Candace Owens have too. Leftists mostly aspire to get some revenue from YouTube and donations from Patreon subscribers.

Some Hollywood stars speaking out.

Very clarifying. Seems that Tyler Robinson wasn't a leftist, but more to the right on the spectrum than Charlie Kirk, more in line with proud white nationalists like Nick Fuentes. Grew up in a MAGA family, with a fixation on weapons, and was taught to use them since he was a child. The right-wingers who wanted to go to war against the left, now they shut up. They don't want to go to war against the so-called Groypers, very consistent, as they usually are. Charlie Kirk, I'm sorry he was killed, but I'm going to mention that he himself said that a number of deaths per year was a worthy price to pay to protect the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. Not even capable of conceding an inch on reasonable gun control measures. Now he is one of these numbers, he paid that price in person.