Hatfort

Some Hollywood stars speaking out.

Very clarifying. Seems that Tyler Robinson wasn't a leftist, but more to the right on the spectrum than Charlie Kirk, more in line with proud white nationalists like Nick Fuentes. Grew up in a MAGA family, with a fixation on weapons, and was taught to use them since he was a child. The right-wingers who wanted to go to war against the left, now they shut up. They don't want to go to war against the so-called Groypers, very consistent, as they usually are. Charlie Kirk, I'm sorry he was killed, but I'm going to mention that he himself said that a number of deaths per year was a worthy price to pay to protect the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. Not even capable of conceding an inch on reasonable gun control measures. Now he is one of these numbers, he paid that price in person.

This is it. It's quite a sophisticated attack, and showcases a well-trained sniper, and a thought-out attack-escape plan. Trump has already blamed the radical left, as he calls it. Well, you can point to the left in general as the primary ideological opposition of Kirk, but the attack itself points more to the right, which is usually more in line and favor of this kind of weapons. So it's not clear for me, and I don't think they'll catch the shooter, as they probably planned the escape well, but we'll see. It's good there's footage of the sniper that fast, at least we know how it happened.

Awful. The world of politics is confrontational by nature, but gun shooting is another level, unacceptable. How to stop it? I don't know, any dumbfuck can access a gun in the US. My condolences to his followers. This sucks.

Yeah, it's true. It's nearly impossible to reason about anything. Trump embodies very well how unreasonable politics has become there. There is a lot of good in the US, but right now it's buried under this thick cape of nonsense. It can get worse, I'm not very optimistic.

Some Americans, in part pushed by the NRA and other weapon lobbies, have made gun ownership part of their identity. There's also the Second Amendment, which is flawed, because who says weapon owners are going to go against a theoretical authoritarian regime? I would say it's more likely the opposite, that they would support one like that, or that they would use their weapons against a legit one. There's also the factor that with so many weapons, insecurity rises, and more people who wouldn't have gotten a gun in normal circumstances, get them, worsening the cycle. It's also a factor in police brutality, most of them are paranoid as anyone can pull a gun out of nowhere, so they are trigger-easy. So it's a fucked up situation. Heavy regulation would solve the problem in a few years, but I don't see this happening for some of the things I listed before. Some light regulations and things like background checks could definitely reduce the problem. That's possible, but Democrats will have to do it. Many Republican Karens and Kevins will whine like the spoiled children they are... So what? Let them, but do it.

Indeed, and they blame Hamas, which the word disproportionate doesn't even cover what they are doing in Gaza. But in the West Bank, there is no Hamas, and the violence is constant from the settler terrorists and the IDF itself. From just a few days ago, three settlers entered an old man's piece of land with their guns, the man tried to stop them, and they ended up shooting his leg. The IDF came and they settlers left freely, but the old man's son was the one detained. The old man lost his leg. Also the assassination of I think it was the cameraman of the documentary, No other land, that won the Oscar. I didn't find any good video, but here is one that show the the shooter and the victim. These are just two recent examples of what the Palestinians are dealing with. There's no Israel defending itself, there's Israel constantly attacking to steal the land from the indigenous inhabitants as the final objective, Gaza and the West Bank, with different tactics.

Sharp guy and well spoken, keeps a tight track of the conflict and Israel's lies. Worth listening to now and in the future.

Not Jews, Zionists. There are so many antizionist Jews around the world who oppose and denounce the atrocities that Israel is and has been committing against the Palestinians and neighboring countries. Zionist civilians, although they support the genocide, have to be protected too. Now, the IDF soldiers and Zionist politicians who have made the decisions should be prosecuted by an international court for their war crimes and crimes against humanity.

I'm not here to defend Russian democracy as flawless, but the last presidential election in 2024 showed a big support for Putin's operations in Ukraine, which was the most important issue people were voting for. His support has increased since the previous one. One of the first things Zelenksy did when the war started was prohibit political parties that represented Russo-Ukrainians and also the leftwing ones, I saw some footage of political leaders being lynched, tied to posts, and things like that. Ukraine is a de facto dictatorship, with Zelensky as visible head and the extreme ultra-right-wing nationalist factions of Ukraine in military power, even if they are not the majority. They are kidnapping men to send them to the frontline to die in vain, which obviously they don't want. People can't speak up against the war, there are reports of people being arrested for criticizing the war in their daily life, not to mention doing it publicly. But everything is fine because they are at war for you guys. Zelensky can hold elections at the moment he decides to and see if the people of Ukraine still want to continue this suicidal path, besides his legal term has ended.

I pointed two things specifically, the battlefield and the economy. I've seen you addressing them, your assessments are wishful thinking for the future, but not based in the reality but go on. Russia keeps advancing and stopping any Ukrainian offensive attempt and it has wonderful relations with so many big, medium, and small countries to maintain its economy immune to any Western sanctions. They reduced their dependency on the dollar-based trade system as a bonus.

Sometimes they do, Russia just had them. Ukraine could have them too, to the extent they control. The East parts were the most Russian-friendly ones in voting, so in a sense, he would have an advantage having to exclude the other side of the frontline. However, he knows he would lose them to any candidate offering a negotiated route with Russia, that's the main reason he won't have them. But okay, let's say exceptional circumstances can justify exceptional measures. I feel sorry for the Ukrainians though, all this is suicidal for them, they never had a chance to win. The Western countries are okay with losing some cash on this, but Ukraine is putting the bodies. You many times accuse others of falling into propaganda, but you are the one who does that, can't even admit the reality of the battlefield. Also the Russian economy collapse is total bullshit.

Especially the ones whose leaders know they are going to lose them. In this case, for prefering a negotiated but inevitable outcome instead of the certain death of their men for a lost cause against a more powerful army.

Man, I saw Zelensky sucking up to Trump, he said 'thank you' so many times in the begining. He wore a suit, he said he wouldn't until the war was over, and it is not over. Whatever, that's not important, but said it is. I don't think they would have ever needed to be so submissive to Russia if he had worked towards a mutual respect and commercial alliance with them, which is what he campaigned for, instead of opening the gates to its big neighbour's military enemy, NATO. I will give a point to Zelensky for the dart of telling Trump he would like to have a country with no elections, like his own. Good one! There is no ceasefire, obviously, why would Russia stop a fight that is winning to give its rival a chance to rest, regroup, and rebuild its army? Would Ukraine propose a ceasefire if it was advancing to the 91 borders? Well, no. Trump acting like he's a neutral party in this conflict is ridiculous though, as the USA is the main power of NATO, and he bragged about arming Ukraine more than Obama did in his first term personally. NATO won't win this war, so it won't be setting any security guarantees, any less by arming what's left of Ukraine. This is one of the main reasons that started the war. Losing a war brings many bad pills to swallow. If they want to continue, they can, and the fight will continue, but they risk an even worse outcome, as time has shown during these three and a half years.

I saw this video, and it reminded me of this thread. Maybe the Democratic Party needs some identity politics in this direction, pandering to men who also need to see masculine figures fighting for positions of power on the left. His main message is clear, the wealth-hoarding oligarchy is the cause of the problems that the working class is facing. As a bonus, stop spending on foreign wars, opposition to the genocide in Palestine, and medicare for all. Graham Platner is a candidate for US senate, I can't say if he is going to win, it depends on his district, but if it is a swing one, he wins. There's also Gavin Newsom, I think he is making some moves thinking about 2028. To awaken the base on the left, he's gotta have something to offer them. He's not gonna win trying to outcompete the right.

Holocaust survivor Stephen Kapos, visiting Israel opened his eyes to the realities of occupation and systemic discrimination against Palestinians. He condemns the disproportionate attacks on Gaza, the ongoing humiliation in the West Bank, and the UK government’s military and diplomatic support for Israel.

I read this, and I think you are right in some ways, but in the inverse, it's Russia that applied your pathway. Sick and tired of NATO and the US sneaking into their close neighbor countries, changing their regimes from allies to militarily hostile ones towards them, including countless destabilization techniques and cues, trying a diplomatic route in Minks where their cosigners repeatedly lied only to buy time, they finally said enough of this shit, and went on a real offensive. Good for them, because nothing else would have worked. They've always let ways out though, because they know the price of war is high for them too, but they have shown to be ready to fight and win. So you want to see new stories of the US meddling in foreign elections? What world have you been living in? Man, they've been doing that shit for decades. I see a lot of medium-tier countries like Indonesia, Vietnam, or Ethiopia tired of the Western ways and joining BRICS because it's better for their political and economic sovereignty. In BRICS there's a win-win approach, with the US you get a corrupt puppet in your country, and your national resources disappear. I do think Russia has been meddling in some ways too, they have been found to have funded many ultra-right-wing parties in Europe. Not going into the Russiagate rabbit hole, but just last year some YouTube channels were found to have been funded by Russia. It wasn't the ones like the Majority Report, but the ones like Tim Pool. Because they've found out the recipe, you want to fuck a country, fund their right-wing extremists. Trump himself is the worst that could have happened to the US internally, they had reasons to incentivise that as a geopolitical opponent. Europe has to wake up to the reality that the US is not behaving like an ally. The best example is what they did to the Nord Stream, which was a good and cheap energy supply for Northern Europe, it was blown up by the US, both Biden and Trump took credit for that. Europe can build a military for itself, that's fine in the world we live in, but going into war with Russia is stupid as fuck. Russia doesn't want to conquer Europe, and Europe doesn't want Russia either. Does Europe have to cut with the US? No, but they have to make clear that they are independent from it, and if the market in the East with Russia and China is good for their interests, they should make their own decisions about how they engage with them, the same way they do with the US.

I don't think the Alaska meeting between Trump and Putin is going to bring any peace. Putin won't accept less than the totality of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson, and NATO hands out of Ukraine. Trump is not going to offer that, and in the end, it's not that bad for the biggest producer of military equipment to have this ongoing, while making Europeans pay the bills. Ukrainian leadership doesn't want anything less than the 91 borders, they are deluded, and or making good profit themselves too. Russia will continue conquering more land, it may go further than these four territories. It seems it's going to be a slow pace, the human wave propaganda news are lies, Russia is not rushing things. In this attrition war, it's possible the pace changes at some point, but doesn't seem it's happening any time soon. The Russian economy's fall is another propaganda talking point, they are doing well, and can sustain this war better than their opponents, and their army is way bigger.

More target assassinations of journalists in Gaza, 28-year-old Anas Al-Sharif, along with other colleagues, were struck in their tent in Gaza city. The genocidal state and army of Israel want the land of Gaza empty of Palestinians, and no witnesses of their crimes. Al-Sharif, aware of the danger to his life, prepared a testament in case this happened some months ago.

One of the victims of Epstein asking for the files to be released fully, protecting the victims' identities, obviously. Not gonna happen though, Trump is deep in those files, as well as other powerful people. They have discussed how public opinion and also the MAGA base would react to different deals with Ghislaine Maxwell to clear Trump, which has not been good for them, because she is a convicted child trafficker. They are testing the waters. Epstein was probably killed, him gone before another trial was the best thing that could have happened to the powerful people involved. People who knew him closely, like his butler, have said that he wasn't suicidal at all. It's also a mess the recordings that have been provided of his prison door, with minutes missing, and other discrepancies. At least all this got big attention, I didn't think it would. However, the blonde politician from his administration, who claimed she had the files on her desk, then backed off, spiraled all this. Trump must love her so much now.

Well, yeah, Trump won. lol People can be fooled, and repeatedly.

Man, you're making odd questions and comparisons. Americans have the potential to make their general conditions for all of them better. The upper class successfully confronts the medium and lower ones against each other, and in the meantime, they hoard the wealth. In the long run, it's bad for them too, but they can't see it, it's like an addiction to hoard more money than they will ever be able to spend. The lower class having more money is good for the economy, because unlike the rich ones, they spend it in businesses, money circulates, and this creates jobs, spiraling even more growth. Inequality is the number one issue, it takes it's sub forms in the affordability of housing or healthcare. Families are bankrupted by medical bills, how is that good for the economy? Young ones will have to pay rent for life or mortgages of fifty years for normal houses. Vacation what? I'm not asking for a revolution though, just for the Democrats to adopt more progressive approaches to help the economy and the people.

Times are changing, I forgot to mention that he was too advanced for his time, and also boomers got it better than the millennials and zoomers. The traditional media still has a huge weight, but since the Internet, it's possible to spread some messages that in the 20th century wouldn't have made even a minute of screentime, and to be insulted at best, in the traditional TV channels. When something gets too big, even the media has to address it. So it's worth trying.

For many reasons, he has been swimming against the current of an already established party apparatus with donors that oppose his policies because they go against their interests, and the traditional media work for the other side too, so they massage the candidates they like, and demonize or just completely ignore the ones like him in screen time, or cut their interventions disingenuosly. Despite of this, he got a small niche in Vermont, and make some noise in the 2010s. Did he win? No, in the end he didn't, the powers he opposed did. But he has my respect for his life work and for trying, he did change some narratives, and put the healthcare right in the discussion as well.