Shermaningeorgia

Aren’t you the Nazi who preaches kindness but then says some don’t deserve good medical treatment? I guess my church taught integrity.

i'm naturally a reserved person. i like it and it's who i am. saying people "must" be loud is a projected norm, it's not some innate thing of the universe. i remember working in a voluntary body. Some very hot lady (and yes, their "kind" tends to be scum) who was a fellow volunteer kept on pestering me "why don't you speak much?" I then said, as i'd lost my tether, "i am who I am. and are you that limited that you must have everybody conform to you and whatever random whims you have in your brain? you have more looks than nous." She complained that i was "rude". I supposed i was, and intended to be. However, I deem it "rude" to let minor shit like that bother somebody. It is true imho that people who push this "loud and chirpy" vibe do so out of conditioning, and not because it's truly inherent. Few things in humanity are truly intrinsic. Personally, I'd only be bothered by something others do if it really affects me. I'd let off minor "things I didn['t like" of others. We all have quirks and minor shit. I feel we should teach interpersonal skills in schools. and get graded for such as an actual exam. This could actually lessen social tensions. We don't have to like or feel comfortable around others. but generally this is due to internal prejudices and whims and things that aren't inherently harmful. We an either tolerate or not associate with others who don't make us feel comfortable, or otherwise don't engage to our liking. Because somebody does or says something we subjectively dislike, it doesn't make that person "bad" or "not as good". We can filter things and people out and move on. it's a shame most hottites don't get that.

I’m a person, yes.

It’s justified. My point stands. People can manage around others better.

I linked such above. Which is well-proven. Because you've never seen nor known somethng, it doesn't mean it cannot exist.

There can be cases where it's necessary. it's not as black and white as you're making out. And that countries cannot use intelligence, when spying is ubitiquous as it stands, to forestall a threat before it arises. it's not unfeasible, and not as blunted as you're making out. Pearl harbor is an example - https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/us-intelligence-failures-pearl-harbor. Not every war is like Iraq with patently bs intelligence.

Most online content creators are scum on some level. Either fake by word or deed. This includes big people on Twitch, YouTube, etc. I feel some person at Google or what have you saw her vids and boosted her via the algorithms. She's good-looking, anti-woke, and looking to "sort men out". perfect....

Whilst there is a rules-based order, countries always undertake foreign policy based on their own needs, ideologies, and whims. The USA's foreign policy has always suited its own ideals and agendas. Entering both world wars was as such, as ws he Cold War. And misguided acts like Iraq. The USA entered both world wars as it saw Germany as a threat to its ideals and values in both. It saw the USSR a threat in the Cold War for the same reason. Desinty is American, so of course supports American values. How else then should countries enable foreign policy? It has to stem from their own needs and realities. Generally speaking, the USA has been pro-democracy and anti-oppression, which was the standard case for its Cold War stance. The point is, Destiny despite being an ass isn't being "too subjective". His views actually align with what foreign policy is - countries advancing their own agendas albeit within a rules-based order.

It's a Jewish state formed as a result of a long Zionist process, and boosted by the Holocaust's aftermath.

A country might have good reason to invade another. There can be a feasible case for a pre-emptive strike on a country leading to war. You mentioned no wars the USA starts. it's never that black and white.

if it's consensual, it's fine.

wild and baseless take.

War is sometimes justified. Life isn't all peace, and part of humanity is dark.

Foreign policy is generally interpreted via standard laws and conventions and national views and biases. Destiny is an ass. But then he is right on Russia - the rationale for the invasion is weak. Putin called them Nazis, which is false. Putin said it was all once part of a greater Russia, so what? Things change and move on, and anachronistic hankerings back to the past are irrational.

Pretty formulaic here. She's pretty, and Pakistani cultures tend to spoil their women, especially if they're hot. So she probably grew up enabled and not just by her family but also by her peer group. Somebody who claims to be Muslim shouldn't even be speaking about dating or sex. not in the terms she does anyhow. And she often said she has no dating experience of note bar being apparently married. So what's the basis of her expertise? She doesn't say much of deep value. Looks matter. And? Leagues exist. And? It's like a doctor saying, "don't smoke" or "don't drink booze too much". Tell us something new. It's all a mix of looks, and enabled by culture and upbringing, and being pretty enough to scam the algorithm by being "anti-woke". She further made a vid on tiktok saying "in another life without Islam, she'd be a drug dealer since she is unprofessional, scampish, has little social empathy, and has no work ethic." So she admitted she has sociopathic traits, by the actual book. And criminals want to make money and not get caught, so a work ethic is a must, as an aside. I recall first seeing her vids a few years ago and thought at first she was OK, but then i turned off since it seems a bit shallow and fake. Especially as her points really aren't that deep, and she has no real bank of experience to go off. Just a typical case of a pretty lady scamming. as many of them do.

You don't make sense. You're a pretty goofy communicator with a skewed comprehension. It's funny that standing ethics offends you. Does integrity offend you also? Or professionalism? Sorry, but as a therapist, it's your JOB to treat ALL who seek your service. Maybe it's the norm in your community to shirk. Pretty shitty community then. and enemies are part of life. you can be deluded and live in a temple, but some things and people are negative and warrant harm. Some retard guru in a temple with a blinded perspective cannot say otherwise.

So she's "anti-woke". But then Japan has been in hte mire economically since the 1990s and no PM since has done much to correct it. can she? Japan and Italy are by far the sick men of the G7. One can foresee a time when China will outdo Japan in terms of technologically. Even most consumer tech isn't Japanese to the degree it was a few decades ago. Seems the conservative US media just are pushing agendas. I have nothing much against Japan, bar whining about Hiroshima when their actions in WW2 have been even widely acknowledged by their own people, but then some anti-woke lady as their PM isn't heavy "news" imho. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cddn7qed35eo

I see darkness in most hot ladies. I thus hate them. People are entitled to be racist and sexist. so why can't I hate hot ladies? wht's the difference? It's all prejudice. Is there a reason why they must be looked up to? they're just humans. People often say "they're only human!" to racists. so? why not extend that to ANY prejudice? What makes their views that paramount? So because some thnk the world has to conform to their partial ways and brains, it's OK for them to be "human" but not others? got it. no, i will never get it.

- me me me! - My view is THE VIEW! so that's your only contribution? being arrogant? fair enough. i'll continue to laugh, since my freedom to post is your sbjective interest lol. I understand you - just how you've been raised. you genuinely think any degree of firvology is "bad". just a coward who picks on "the weak", but lets' some indian dopey kid post all manner of stuff cos it suits YOUR agenda and interest. humans have a mix of emotions. not just one. even complete happiness/joy isn't healthy. I know what to do to trigger you, then i'll keep that in mind.

Probably has some corporate favours from them.

You following me around to tell me all this manner of bs is comical! i do as i please. i don't care about your interest. and? should I? if you're as smart as purported, then you clearly lack human understanding. are you morose? inner nerdy? do you often project? smart people analyse life around them and hteir emotions. Smart people don't project. Keep on "instructing me" to adhere to your interest. sensitive humanless oaf.

not true. most say "it's only human".

i've come to a realisation. i feel most nay all hot ladies have an inner haughty psychological schema. i don't believe any person or group is better. the seasons to like hot ladies "more" is shallow and thin. It's just down to sex. we don't need to reprdocue with hot ladies. it's not required from an evolutionary standpoint. i don't look up to any group. is there a reason I should, or anybody else? Should one look up to Catholics, Protestants, men, women, straights, gays, Muslims, dog lovers, nurses, teachers, Madridistas, or Mongolians? Why or why not? They're all random groups who are not all alike. Somebody tell me WHY I must look up to hot ladies. why? reason to me like an adult/man why I should. Convince me why i MUST.

if he is, so be it. he's never been homophobic and preaches "tolerance and love", so it won't be a double standard.

doesn't matter if a trans lady has a dick. if a man likes her, he's not gay. the allure of feminity is still the same.