Shermaningeorgia

Two perspectives that broadly overlap. A gay man wouldn't date anybody who even looks female.

The definnitions Kinsey made decades ago stll stand. And men like women physically for feminine physcial and behavioural characteristics. That's independent of of seeing her genitals, which even when naked are not technically visible always.

I disagree. for most men who like trans women it's about the general feminine air. Men generally like women beyond mere genitals or secondary sex characteristics like boobs. it's also about the female form, mannerisms, etc. most men into trans women self-report they'd never date or fuck another man. Gays like other men and are into men. and that's not just about genitals either. Gays like men for similkar reasons hetero women like men. it's the masculine air and not just the fact men have penises.

You have to do things to help get followers and make Instagram recommend your page. Your product is quite niche so this would require extra work.

Consistent posting. Sharing on like platforms, such as Facebook groups, X, etc. The algorithm favours reach and content. So more content and reach means more followers. it also depends on the topic in question. Niche interests won't push the algorithm. I do social media as a living, and I often use this formula as described for good results. All marketing rests on gaining mutual value with customers. Customers will only know about said value if they actually can see it - hence posting and sharing in places they are frequenting. I used to work for a tourist board. So I'd make messages and share them on city or country-related message boards. Or on X at specific people, who in turn might like or retweet it.

i'd say it makes sense. Though its also best to test it against the general market, via either primary or secondary research. One's friends are a very small population and market to gauge viability by

dating trans women is still somewhat taboo. This is despite trans porn being massive as well as most maor cities in the world have numerous trans escorts. It's not gay t like trans women imho. doesn't matter if said person is pre or non-op and thus still has a penis. A gay man wouldn't be attracted to a general female form as it stands. This is one reson why "chasers" and the down low exists, due to the societal stigma attached. Some prominent trans women have parnters but even then they sometimes get told they're gay. It's common amongst trans women to say they have issues getting relationships, mainly as a result of societal stigma and men being too scared to date them but willing to fuck them. In Thailand, since this references ladyboys in particular, it seems it might be harder since it's a conservstgive country and ladyboys there are seem as a pecularity to be tolerated at best.

you comically lack sociality. you need it more than i ever do.

yes you get so offended that you hate rules. sociopath? unhappy mid-westerner? possibly both. I do not care. sorry, but then managers are there to aid staff. does that offend you, or you're braindead? I'm amused me posting here bothers you. i maintain it's the same tone. so what't the issue? your brain cannot handle consistent thought. and if you tell anybody that they don't warrant competent workplace conduct, then you get it. all people of your retard brain do. so fuck off and don't respond. but your sub-normal sociality compels you. since you're offended at who does and says what in life, right?

I distrust hot ladies in the workplace, especially in management roles. Hot ladies generally are unpleasant and unprofessional. They espouse non-diligence in life. They disregard all contemporary stuff to pose. All contemporary working/management practices. I did some temporary warehouse work for student money and the immediate team leader was some hot lady. Every time I asked her for help, she gave me a massive, bad look. Oh, sorry, was I bothering you? Like you know that your JOB, right? Or is being hot and edgy the key here? Do these "people" ever think "Well, I have a job to do, so let me do it FULLY." Seems unlikely. Seems these people aren't competent enough to handle others in work settings.

One can get them conceptually, since gender is subjective. But then what I don't get is why people who use them whine about how theworld doesn't get them. Don't they get that their actions are pretty radical, and most aren't into cutting-edge gender theory? Idon't care if this seems ageist - but I feel Gen Z has been warped and has no concept of give and take in life. People cannot immediately identify with stargender or deergender, and that doesn't make them bad people.

Since some are racist and sexist, I don't see why it's ethically wrong for me to be this way: - Avoid all pretty ladies in any capacity - Despise all pretty ladies with all my heart I view them as negative as human beings. Since they get spoiled by looks, they develop haughty and negative characters. And most are bullies. I won't let them use their social power on me any longer. I immediately label them all mentally as scum and act accordingly. My mind equates looks with devilishness. It's the norm in the West to say people have a right to be racist/sexist, provided they don't go too far. So I don't see the issue with my views then. Other people's off double standards and whims be damned. I'm resolved that at gatherings i will seldom if ever, engage with them.

I'm not bothered really. your points are cringe and weird. that's all. I'm entitled to my opinions.

He's an actual doctor. But then mid-western nerds with bad social appraisal just KNOW things without evidence, right?

goofy communicator.

Ok, so they hate us, so we hate them. Hate just begets hate.

It's often said that comparison is wrong. Yes, it can be problematic, but then it can also provide fuel and growth. We're not all the same. However, it's never as simple to say that comparison is false and invalid.

Peope who say looks never matter are bad people, since they intend to mislead. It's pretty simple.

Why do people tell others looks don’t matter ? seems to me it’s those who are blinded to life that say that.

Furthermore, my standard for any public medical professional is whether they push or advocate for things that breach medical ethics or are not evidence-based. Generally, he doesn't. His psychiatric views are on point for the most part. He seems like a bonafide and trained doctor, and isn't like Sadia Khan who seemingly has no firm therapetic credentials.

Most mental health pros are scum. But he is an exception. He seems to get modern generations, living and how to engage. And he seems pretty upstanding across the board. There was the issue with Reckful, and that was wrong, but the medical board gave him a light censure. There are very few professionals who don't ever get called up for stuff, no matter how minor. So yes, Reckful probably shouldn't have died, and he showed an error in judgment in aiding him, but overall, I feel his work is well done and received. He does speak about Indian spirituality and Ayurveda often. Though it seems it's like a supplementary thing and not as proper practice, which wouldbe wrong as it's not deemed practising or evidence-based medicine. Overall, I think he's a positive point. I genuinely despise most mental health professionals, but he is a rare exception since he seems to get things and relate tothe contemporary world well.

And my OP point STANDS. who can prove it wrong? If hot ladies/b****s cannot handle NORMAL working practices, then they shou;dn't be managers. plain and simple. Their only concern should be "i have a job to do, i have to act in a way that serves my company." THAT IS IT! Everybody else gets BASIC management practice, so why don't they? It shows then hotties are unprofessional, lack diligence and frankly, RUDIMENTARY social skills and psychological capabilities.

You might looks, but so what? there IS NO human trait that warrants absolute attention or adulation. So if you robbed a bank or kidnapped somebody's child, would you think you should get away with it? if so, then my suspciion of your warped social comprehension is accurate.

Due to looks, affect your interpersonal style. always telling others what's what and what to think. and if people don't adhere to that, then what? You'd beat or kill them? good! since all hail some babe who was spoilt as a little girl, and it's influenced her bad and grossly hypocritical world comprehension.

well, if you're so "nice and kind and benevolent" you won't push negative views then. You're hardly as "wise" as you purport and people (ALL PEOPLE) getting by clearly offends you. good. keep on getting offended at petty things. Or stay in in some rural Indian backwater, since life elsewhere doesn't suit you. I neither tolerate nor abide by two-faced people, or those who get offended over petty societal/professional rules.